RTI India Join Big Helpers! Donate to RTI India!


Welcome to the RTI India: The complete Online Portal for Right to Information in India.

Right to Information has an important economic dimension, as it embraces not only political freedom but also the freedom to lead a life with dignity, unfettered by domination and discrimination.

Our aim is to provide authentic and analytical help regarding Right to Information in India to Officers, Lawyers, Citizens, RTI Activist, Associations, & NGO's. Our strength is in bringing them all at one platform.

Join RTI India!

Sec 8(1)(a)(e) RTI ACt

This is a discussion on Sec 8(1)(a)(e) RTI ACt within the Ask for RTI Query forums, part of the RTI Community Support category; The RBI declined to furnish information on the fraud committed in a bank which was detected by the RBI Inspection.The RBI declined to furnish information citing the Sec 8(1)(a)(e). Give ...


RTI India Official Toolbar
New Thread
Go Back   RTI India > RTI Community Support > Ask for RTI Query

89396 Webpages

Register Tags Members List Mark Forums Read
Notices

  #1  
Old 07-10-2007, 09:42 PM
Just Popping In

 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Age: 58
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 2
p.esakkimuthu is on a distinguished road
Smile Unanswered: Sec 8(1)(a)(e) RTI ACt

The RBI declined to furnish information on the fraud committed in a bank which was detected by the RBI Inspection.The RBI declined to furnish information citing the Sec 8(1)(a)(e). Give some decisions of CIC in this connection
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-11-2007, 12:09 AM
ganpat1956's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,214
Rep Power: 36
ganpat1956 has much to be proud ofganpat1956 has much to be proud ofganpat1956 has much to be proud ofganpat1956 has much to be proud ofganpat1956 has much to be proud ofganpat1956 has much to be proud ofganpat1956 has much to be proud ofganpat1956 has much to be proud ofganpat1956 has much to be proud of
Provided Answers: 1
Re: Sec 8(1)(a)(e) RTI ACt

Where the over-riding public interest in seeking the information has not been indicated by the applicant/appellant, even the CIC has rejected such appeals with the following ruling:
"Since there is no public interest involved in disclosure of information
sought and that the appellant is not associated with the case, the appeal is treated as a frivolous application. And, hence, dismissed."
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-11-2007, 08:46 AM
Satish Gupta's Avatar
Quite a regular

 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 58
Posts: 75
Rep Power: 2
Satish Gupta is on a distinguished road
Re: Sec 8(1)(a)(e) RTI ACt

RTI: Exemption 8(1)(e) reads as follows:>
>
"(e) information available to a person in his fiduciary relationship, unless the competent authority is satisfied that the larger public interest warrants the disclosure of such information;">

Black's Law Dictionary defines "fiduciary relationship" as "A very broad term embracing both technical fiduciary relations and those informal relations which exist wherever one person trusts in or relies on another." Examples of fiduciary relations are those existing between attorney and client, guardian and ward, principal and agent, trustee and beneficiaries of trust, and executor and heir.

This exemption is going to cause a lot of problems, since CIC or SIC can interpret it in any which way. True fiduciary relationships are very rare in a government setting. You can see such relationship if a third person wants medical reports written by a government doctor on a patient. However government can argue that any relationship where one party expects confidentiality, can be a fiduciary relationship.

One such case is being litigated in Kerala High Court. The CIC ruled that the relationship between government and the examiners, it hired, (to grade answer sheets) have a fiduciary relationship! If this argument is upheld by court, then any government contractor can claim such relationship. The case is Treesha Irish vs, CIC.

Good luck

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
banking activities, exemption


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


Copyrights

New to Site?

Need Help?

Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 Web Technologies by Dr. Kushal Pathak

All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 02:45 PM.



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45