View Single Post

  #2  
Old 03-22-2008, 01:02 PM
karira's Avatar
karira karira is offline

 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Secunderabad
Posts: 5,178
Rep Power: 63
karira has much to be proud ofkarira has much to be proud ofkarira has much to be proud ofkarira has much to be proud ofkarira has much to be proud ofkarira has much to be proud ofkarira has much to be proud ofkarira has much to be proud of
Re: RTI cell in MSU yet to be institutionalised

Quote:
Originally Posted by karira View Post

University officials refused to divulge information about the applications, stating that the matters were still sub-judice.

How can a RTI application made to a PIO be "sub-judice" ?
The PIO is not a "quasi judicial officer ".

In any case, information related to matters which are "sub-judice" cannot be withheld by a Public Authority unless there is a specific direction from the court for non disclosure of documents/records.

RTI applications, once submitted to the PIO, become public documents, as are the replies which are given by the PIO.

Has any member ever tried filing a RTI Application to see someone elses RTI application, the reply of the PIO, First or Second Appeal details ? It will be interesting to know the outcome.
Reply With Quote