vijaynaru,
Did the
PIO give you detailed reasons as to why he thinks Sec 8(1)(g) and Sec 11 are applicable in the present case ?
If there is any denial of information by the
PIO under Sec 8, he must justify as to how the matter on hand is covered by the exemption. Just quoting the Section number or quoting the section "ad-verbatim" is not enough. Detailed reasons have to be given by the
PIO after applying his mind. Please see the citations in the following post:
Whether case pending in court may be used as ground not to provide information.
1. The copy of the complaint has to be given to you under
RTI.
It cannot be covered under Sec 8(1)(g) or Sec 11 (third party).
Even if it is covered, the
PIO must seek views of the "third party" and then apply his mind to decide whether the information can be disclosed or not. He can also apply the "severability" clause and disclose part of the information.
Some
CIC decisions that will help you:
http://cic.gov.in/CIC-Orders/Decision_14022008_03.pdf http://cic.gov.in/CIC-Orders/Decision_14032008_02.pdf http://cic.gov.in/CIC-Orders/Decision_28022008_12.pdf http://cic.gov.in/CIC-Orders/WB-03042008-03.pdf http://cic.gov.in/CIC-Orders/Decision_20092006_14.pdf http://cic.gov.in/CIC-Orders/WB-03042008-03.pdf
2. I am not so sure about loan details being disclosed, unless you can justify that the disclosure is in greater "public interest".