View Single Post

  #2  
Old 04-17-2008, 02:49 PM
colnrkurup's Avatar
colnrkurup colnrkurup is offline
Name: Col NR Kurup (Retd)
Home away from Home

 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Kerala
Posts: 1,259
Rep Power: 15
colnrkurup will become famous soon enoughcolnrkurup will become famous soon enough
Re: IC O P Kejariwal misinterprets the RTI Act 2005 !

If one go only by the wordings in section 18 there is no time limit prescribed for preferring a complaint. But such a view is not commensurate with normal legal juripurudence. There has to be a time limit for everything concerned with judicial proceedings. One cannot allow someone to prefer a complaint after 10 years on a plea that there is no time limit prescribed. If 6 months is condoned why not 10 years or even 20 years However by reading in between the lines the time limit is conspicuous. Section 18 lays down that "Subject to the provisions of this Act, it shall be.......... This imply that other provisions of the act concerning same matter is applicable in the case of Section 18 also. Indirectly it imply that stipulation of time limit prescribed in Section 19(3) is equally applicable to Section 18 .Anyway that is how I interpret this Section.
Reply With Quote