RTI India Join Big Helpers! Donate to RTI India!


Welcome to the RTI India: The complete Online Portal for Right to Information in India.

Right to Information has an important economic dimension, as it embraces not only political freedom but also the freedom to lead a life with dignity, unfettered by domination and discrimination.

Our aim is to provide authentic and analytical help regarding Right to Information in India to Officers, Lawyers, Citizens, RTI Activist, Associations, & NGO's. Our strength is in bringing them all at one platform.

Join RTI India!

KIC imposes max penalty

This is a discussion on KIC imposes max penalty within the RTI News & Discussion forums, part of the RTI News, Circulars and Decisions category; Karnataka Information Commission imposed a penalty of Rs.25000/- on a Public Information Officer who not only failed to failed to provide the information but also wilfully ignored the summons issued ...


RTI India Official Toolbar
New Thread
Go Back   RTI India > RTI News, Circulars and Decisions > RTI News & Discussion

104356 Webpages

Register Tags Meet Our Staff Members List Mark Forums Read
Notices

  #1  
Old 08-25-2007, 04:02 PM
ganpat1956's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,390
Rep Power: 38
ganpat1956 has much to be proud ofganpat1956 has much to be proud ofganpat1956 has much to be proud ofganpat1956 has much to be proud ofganpat1956 has much to be proud ofganpat1956 has much to be proud ofganpat1956 has much to be proud ofganpat1956 has much to be proud ofganpat1956 has much to be proud of
KIC imposes max penalty

Karnataka Information Commission imposed a penalty of Rs.25000/- on a Public Information Officer who not only failed to failed to provide the information but also wilfully ignored the summons issued by the Commission to appear before the commission personally.

Mr. Ranganath, Additional Tahasildar of Yalahanka failed to provide the information sought by one Mr. Aswath Narayana Gowda regarding burial ground of Kodigehally Hally Village. Mr. Gowda had sought information on 20.12.2006 and despite adjournment for three times and direction from the Karnataka Information Commission to provide the required information, the PIO wilfully disobeyed the orders.

Mr. K K Misra, Chief Information Commissioner imposed a penalty and directed the Deputy Commissioner, Bangalore Urban District to deduct the penalty from the salary of the PIO in five equal instalment of Rs.5000/- This is the first order ever issued by the karnataka Information Commission imposing a maximum penalty of Rs.25000/- under the Right to Information Act.

[posted by Shri Veeresh Bellur on Humjanenge]
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-25-2007, 04:22 PM
neeraj Chauhan's Avatar
Just Popping In

 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 42
Rep Power: 2
neeraj Chauhan is on a distinguished road
Re: KIC imposes max penalty

I guess Penalty imposition is good enough but dont u feel there should be some kinda administrative or Discipilinary action also after proper inquiry into detailed reasons of non supply of information in case it is wilful and intentional to ignore he RTI Act . Here we can say RTI act needs to some teeth before it can really become tiger.
bye
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-25-2007, 07:51 PM
Satish Gupta's Avatar
Quite a regular

 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 58
Posts: 82
Rep Power: 2
Satish Gupta is on a distinguished road
Re: KIC imposes max penalty

The Rs 25,000/- penalty is "per incident". Hopefully some RTI activist will file RTI applications with the same PIO, and if he ignores it again he could be penalized again.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-11-2007, 01:10 PM
colnrkurup's Avatar
Name: Col NR Kurup (Retd)
Home away from Home

 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Kerala
Posts: 1,277
Rep Power: 15
colnrkurup will become famous soon enoughcolnrkurup will become famous soon enough
Re: KIC imposes max penalty

We have been reading reports from CIC and SICs about huge penalties impossed by them. What happened to the amount. Is there any machinery to check that the penalty has been realised ? to my knowledge even the CIC does not have any separate "Head of Account" The condition of SICs are worse. Untill and unless there is separate Head ofAccount for RTI receipts (Penalty), and someone tallying the figures I doubt its realisation.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
penalty


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads for: KIC imposes max penalty

Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Info rap & penalty on IIT sidmis RTI News & Discussion 0 11-22-2007 06:17 AM
Whether imposing a penalty is a prerogative vashisthvivek RTI News & Discussion 8 11-06-2007 01:23 AM
sUGGESTIOR FOR REQUESTING PENALTY abhijeet Ask for RTI Query 1 10-22-2007 12:51 PM
CIC imposes Rs 25,000 fine on Estate director ganpat1956 RTI News & Discussion 1 06-15-2007 02:03 PM
CIC imposes fine on doctor for info delay ganpat1956 RTI News & Discussion 1 04-11-2007 03:57 PM


Copyrights

New to Site?

Need Help?

Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 Web Technologies by Dr. Kushal Pathak

All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 02:10 PM.



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51