| Welcome to the RTI India: The complete Online Portal for Right to Information in India. Right to Information has an important economic dimension, as it embraces not only political freedom but also the freedom to lead a life with dignity, unfettered by domination and discrimination. Our aim is to provide authentic and analytical help regarding Right to Information in India to Officers, Lawyers, Citizens, RTI Activist, Associations, & NGO's. Our strength is in bringing them all at one platform. |
This is a discussion on RTI appeal gets 3 different responses from 3 High Courts within the RTI News & Discussion forums, part of the RTI News, Circulars and Decisions category; [The title of the news story should read as " RTI Application" and not RTI Appeal--Ganpat] NEW DELHI: In what is a classic case of disparate ways of interpreting the ...
| New Thread |
| |||||||
89396 Webpages | Register | Tags | Members List | Mark Forums Read |
| Notices |
|
#1
| |||||
| |||||
[The title of the news story should read as "RTI Application" and not RTI Appeal--Ganpat] NEW DELHI: In what is a classic case of disparate ways of interpreting the same law, a Right to Information (RTI) request has elicited different responses from different courts, as appellant Shruti Singh Chauhan has discovered. The information that Chauhan asked from three high courts was the same: the total budget; the procedure for the appointment of staff and the vacancies; the number of judgments reserved in each court; and finally the sting in tail the number and nature of complaints against each judge. While the Delhi High Court refused to give information on any of the queries, the fledgling Chhattisgarh HC gave detailed replies to the questions. Interestingly, the Allahabad HC refused the petition asking her to submit separate applications for each item of information and a fee of Rs 500 for each. Chauhan had filed the RTI request asking for information on the total budget of the particular court along with a break-up of the amount available with each department, the number of judgments that have been reserved and since when, the number of complaints against each judge serving in the court, and procedure for appointment of class III and IV employees and a list of vacancies. In theory, the response of three HCs should have been the same. Surprisingly, Chauhan received varied responses from each court. The Delhi High Court ruled that it could not give information on its budget under rule 4(IV) and 5(a) of the Delhi HC (Right to Information) Rules, 2006. Rule 4(IV) says information on any decision that is taken administratively or quasi judicially...shall be available only to the affected persons while rule 5(a) gives exemption from disclosure if the information which is not in the public domain or does not relate to judicial functions and duties of the court and matters incidental and ancillary thereto. http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/...ow/2311229.cms |
![]() |
| Tags |
| rti, appeal, different, responses, courts |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How is RTI helpful for pending heinous crime cases in the High Courts where the case has not been listed for last 10 yrs? | Sanjaybaranwal | Ask for RTI Query | 1 | 04-26-2008 07:30 PM |
| Are The Commissions Are Courts ? | colnrkurup | RTI General Discussions | 7 | 12-17-2007 05:56 AM |
| Is there PIO in Courts? Can we ask information under RTI from Court? | aneeta91 | Ask for RTI Query | 4 | 12-14-2007 12:24 AM |
| Decisions of CIC and SCIC upheld or stayed by Supreme Court and/or High Courts | agarwalas | Site Feedback | 5 | 07-16-2007 11:36 AM |
| Indian Courts | damanjeet_singh | New Member Introduction | 1 | 02-23-2007 04:02 PM |
Copyrights | New to Site? | Need Help? |
|
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 Web Technologies by Dr. Kushal Pathak |