View Single Post

  #2  
Old 05-17-2008, 02:14 PM
colnrkurup's Avatar
colnrkurup colnrkurup is offline
Name: Col NR Kurup (Retd)
Home away from Home

 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Kerala
Posts: 1,372
Rep Power: 16
colnrkurup is on a distinguished roadcolnrkurup is on a distinguished road
Re: Necessary Amendments To The Rti Act

It does not make any differance. There is already a provision viz.,Section 167 IPC - Public servant framing incorrect document with intend to cause injury .......is liable for punishment upto 3 years with fine or both. False Affidiavit viz., filing a false statement in oath or afirmation also provide the same punishment under 181 IPC..

Further framing false statement and filing false affidavit is a very routine among the PIOs. When this is expossed with documentary evidence nothing happens or rather our bureaucracy does not consider it as an offence. In a particular case when I had reported and even told personally to even the District Collector the reply one get is that it was a mistake. None of them have any answer as to what is the status of information conveyed in the false affidavit. Believe it or not even Sri.Palat Mohandas, the State Chief Information Ciommmissioner of Kerala did not consider a complaint proving with documentary evendence of a false affidavit furnished by the Tahsildar Tellicherry on his own orders.

Do you still feel the necessity of amending Section 7(1) of the RTI Act ?
Reply With Quote