RTI India Join Big Helpers! RTI INDIA SMS


Join RTI India!


Welcome to RTI India: The complete Online Portal for Right to Information in India.

Right to Information has an important economic dimension, as it embraces not only political freedom but also the freedom to lead a life with dignity, unfettered by domination and discrimination.

Our aim is to provide authentic and analytical help regarding Right to Information in India to Officers, Lawyers, Citizens, RTI Activist, Associations, & NGO's. Our strength is in bringing them all at one platform.


"PMO not bound to disclose list of secret Netaji files"

This is a discussion on "PMO not bound to disclose list of secret Netaji files" within the RTI News & Discussion forums, part of the RTI News, Circulars and Decisions category; http://www.missionnetaji.org/page/pmo_12oct.html Prime Minister's Office has informed Central Information Commission that it has no obligation under the RTI Act to disclose information relating to list of secret files on Subhas Chandra ...


RTI India Official Toolbar
Go Back   RTI India > RTI News, Circulars and Decisions > RTI News & Discussion

522209 Webpages

Register Tags Members Mark Forums Read
  #1  
Old 10-19-2007, 09:36 PM
Anuj Dhar's Avatar
Quite a regular


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 74
Anuj Dhar is on a distinguished road
"PMO not bound to disclose list of secret Netaji files"


http://www.missionnetaji.org/page/pmo_12oct.html

Prime Minister's Office has informed Central Information Commission that it has no obligation under the RTI Act to disclose information relating to list of secret files on Subhas Chandra Bose. The assertion follows the CIC's notice to PMO over an appeal by Mission Netaji's Anuj Dhar, who sought the list in October last year, but was denied.

"Disclosure of information relating to list of classified files being held in this office will prejudicially affect relations with foreign countries, writes PMO's Central Public Information Officer Kamal Dayani. "In view of that, there was no obligation for this office to disclose information to this information seeker."

PMO wants the appeal to CIC "be dismissed as not maintainable" because it seeks information protected by Sections 8(1)(a) and (f) of the RTI Act.

Dhar had asked the PMO to confirm if they were holding several classified records/materials on Subhas Bose, and requested for descriptive lists of classified and unclassified records. He also inquired if the PMO had any plan to transfer these records/materials to the National Archives.

In reply, the PMO furnished a list of unclassified files and stated that "an exercise was underway to review classified files held by PMO for declassification and on declassification such files would be sent to National Archives". There was no word on the classified (secret) files.

Subsequently, Dhar approached the Appellate Authority in the PMO only to be told that the details about classified files cannot be provided.

In his appeal to CIC, Dhar argued that "it defies common sense as to how the disclosure of a mere list of files on and about a national hero, whom the Government holds to have died more than 60 years ago in an accident, can prejudicially affect relations with foreign countries in 2006-2007".


Reply With Quote
Alt Today
RTI INDIA
Related Links
 
Standard Guests Links

  #2  
Old 02-19-2008, 07:43 PM
karira's Avatar

 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Secunderabad
Posts: 13,880
karira has much to be proud ofkarira has much to be proud ofkarira has much to be proud ofkarira has much to be proud ofkarira has much to be proud ofkarira has much to be proud ofkarira has much to be proud ofkarira has much to be proud ofkarira has much to be proud ofkarira has much to be proud ofkarira has much to be proud of
Re: "PMO not bound to disclose list of secret Netaji files"


As reported in hindu.com on 19 February 2008:
The Hindu News Update Service

CIC asks PMO to make public list of 29 files on Netaji

New Delhi (PTI): Rejecting the PMO's refusal to provide a list of classified files relating to Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has asked it to make public a list of 29 such files.

The Commission's decision came after the PMO produced before it 33 classified files on the revolutionary leader. It, however, exempted four related files as they had reference to foreign states.

Acting on an RTI application of 'Mission Netaji' - a Delhi-based research trust - challenging PMO's refusal to make public its classified files on Netaji, the CIC had, in its order of January 25, asked the latter to produce in a sealed cover a list of classified files for its perusal.

The Prime Minister's Office while declining to produce the list of the classified files had earlier said that divulging their contents could affect India's sovereignty and relations with foreign nations.

Perusing through the files as produced by the PMO, Chief Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah said while four of the 33 classified files had a reference to foreign nations, rest of the 29 files should be given.
In its order passed on Monday, the CIC also noted that out of the 29 files, seven were classified "top secret," three "confidential" while the rest were marked "secret." Apart from the 33 files, the PMO also informed the Commission about two recently de-classified files.

"Under the circumstances, the PMO will provide a list of the 29 remaining files in addition to the two recently de-classified files, and list their titles," Habibullah said while directing the PMO's information officer Amit Agrawal to provide the list within 10 days to Anuj Dhar, a Mission Netaji functionary.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-19-2008, 09:27 PM
Anuj Dhar's Avatar
Quite a regular


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 74
Anuj Dhar is on a distinguished road
Re: "PMO not bound to disclose list of secret Netaji files"


Our take is here:

Details about 31 PMO Netaji files to be disclosed


The Central Information Commission (CIC) has directed the Prime Minister's Office to partially disclose the list of classified files on Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose. After personally reviewing a list of 35 files provided by the PMO under a sealed envelope, Chief Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah has directed that the details about 31 be given to Mission Netaji's Anuj Dhar. The titles of remaining 4 files have references to foreign states and, therefore, will not figure in the list to be made public.

The latest CIC decision follows a previous one on January 2008, when the PMO was directed to furnish the list of classified files to enable Chief Information Commissioner assess the bona fide of the PMO's decision to not to release the same under RTI . Last week, PMO Director Amit Agrawal showed Wajahat Habibullah the list containing titles and filing numbers of 33 classified and 2 recently declassified files. Out of 33 files, 7 are classified "top secret", 3 "confidential" and the rest "secret".

While CIC favoured the release of information about 31 files, it accepted the plea of PMO that disclosing the names of 4 files having references to foreign states will prejudicially effect relation with those foreign states. The CIC states that it "does not arrogate to itself the authority to adjudicate on matters concerning foreign relations, an issue to decide upon which the authorised agency competent so to do is the Ministry of External Affairs."

"We will therefore not address the issue of whether such reference will 'prejudicially effect relation with a foreign state' and accept the plea of respondents (PMO) that disclosure of the file names will so do," Chief Information Commissioner said in his decision.

Case background

Mission Netaji's Anuj Dhar had asked the PMO to confirm if they were holding several classified records/materials on Subhas Bose, and requested for descriptive lists of classified and unclassified records. He also inquired if the PMO had any plan to transfer these records/materials to the National Archives.

In reply, the PMO furnished a list of unclassified files and stated that "an exercise was underway to review classified files held by PMO for declassification and on declassification such files would be sent to National Archives". There was no word on the classified (secret) files.

Subsequently, Dhar approached the Appellate Authority in the PMO and was informed that "disclosure of information relating to list of classified files being held in this office will prejudicially affect relations with foreign countries …(and) in view of that, there was no obligation for this office to disclose information to this information seeker."

In his appeal to CIC, Dhar argued that "it defies common sense as to how the disclosure of a mere list of files on and about a national hero, whom the Government holds to have died more than 60 years ago in an accident, can prejudicially affect relations with foreign countries".

In January this year, Chief Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah heard the arguments of PMO and Dhar and decided to see the list for himself.

After the perusal, the Commissioner has ruled in favour of Dhar, marking another achievement for Mission Netaji in the efforts to access information under the Right to Information Act.


Read the CIC decisions

:::MISSION NETAJI::: CIC decision on list of classified files in PMO on Subhas Bose

Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
secret, netaji
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


TwitterFacebook

Copyrights

New to Site?

Need Help?

Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 Web Technologies by Dr. Kushal Pathak

All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 10:48 PM.