Dear Col Sir,
The only purpose that
RTI Act served here was bringing out the fact that the QR of having completed two years training prior to applying for the post was not prescribed as a pre requisite for applicants.
It was only included afterwards to form a basis for rejection of the application of my friend.
If you go thru the decision it clearly states that i quote "
On the ground that there is no trained applicant another candidate who was untrained was appointed in May, 07. My friend had a better claim than the appointed candidate under Untrained category also. This was ignored. Her RTI application was discouraged and delayed. The DSE did all he could to se that no corrective action was taken in time. After the RTI application the wrongly appointed candidate was quietly asked to resign"
The final outcome of the action taken by the Education Dept on the decision of
SIC is still awaited as nothing has been received in writing till date from any of the departments.
Had the other candidate been genuine, it would not have quit that job. The very fact that the recruitment process was not fair enough