| Welcome to the RTI India: The complete Online Portal for Right to Information in India. Right to Information has an important economic dimension, as it embraces not only political freedom but also the freedom to lead a life with dignity, unfettered by domination and discrimination. Our aim is to provide authentic and analytical help regarding Right to Information in India to Officers, Lawyers, Citizens, RTI Activist, Associations, & NGO's. Our strength is in bringing them all at one platform. |
This is a discussion on Info rap & penalty on IIT within the RTI News & Discussion forums, part of the RTI News, Circulars and Decisions category; The Central Information Commission has rapped the Indian Institute of Technology, Madras, for denying information on selection of OBCs as faculty to a former member of Parliament. The IIT has ...
| New Thread |
| |||||||
104356 Webpages | Register | Tags | Meet Our Staff | Members List | Mark Forums Read |
| Notices |
|
#1
| |||||
| |||||
The Central Information Commission has rapped the Indian Institute of Technology, Madras, for denying information on selection of OBCs as faculty to a former member of Parliament. The IIT has been ordered to pay the airfare of K.N. Murukes, who represented Tamil Nadu’s Karur in the 10th Lok Sabha. “It’s a small victory, the fact that IIT is being penalised. But they still haven’t provided the information I’d asked for,” Murukes told The Telegraph. Murukes had asked the IIT for details of its appointment procedures, specifically those related to OBC applicants. Under the right to information act, all applications seeking information must be replied to within 30 days. Under special circumstances, the public authority can take up to 45 days. The IIT, however, took 90 days to respond and, when it did, the reply was incomplete, the information commission concluded. In addition to Murukes’s travel expenses, the institute may have to shell out as much as Rs 25,000 as fine for the delay. The commission has issued a showcause notice to the IIT seeking an explanation. New Delhi, Nov. 21 The Telegraph - Calcutta : Nation |
![]() |
| Tags |
| iit |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Whether imposing a penalty is a prerogative | vashisthvivek | RTI News & Discussion | 8 | 11-06-2007 01:23 AM |
| sUGGESTIOR FOR REQUESTING PENALTY | abhijeet | Ask for RTI Query | 1 | 10-22-2007 12:51 PM |
| KIC imposes max penalty | ganpat1956 | RTI News & Discussion | 3 | 09-11-2007 01:10 PM |
| Penalty of Rs 25,000 under RTI Act in West Bengal | abhijeet | RTI News & Discussion | 3 | 08-19-2007 04:24 PM |
| RTI Act: CIC levies penalty against BHU registrar | maneesh | RTI News & Discussion | 1 | 11-17-2006 07:51 PM |
Copyrights | New to Site? | Need Help? |
|
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 Web Technologies by Dr. Kushal Pathak |