RTI India Join Big Helpers! Donate to RTI India!


Welcome to the RTI India: The complete Online Portal for Right to Information in India.

Right to Information has an important economic dimension, as it embraces not only political freedom but also the freedom to lead a life with dignity, unfettered by domination and discrimination.

Our aim is to provide authentic and analytical help regarding Right to Information in India to Officers, Lawyers, Citizens, RTI Activist, Associations, & NGO's. Our strength is in bringing them all at one platform.

Join RTI India!

DDA penalised by CIC

This is a discussion on DDA penalised by CIC within the RTI News & Discussion forums, part of the RTI News, Circulars and Decisions category; The Central Information Commission ( CIC ) has asked Delhi Development Authority (DDA) to pay Rs 1,750 as fine after its Public Information Officer ( PIO ) failed to respond ...


RTI India Official Toolbar
New Thread
Go Back   RTI India > RTI News, Circulars and Decisions > RTI News & Discussion

104356 Webpages

Register Tags Meet Our Staff Members List Mark Forums Read
Notices

  #1  
Old 12-17-2006, 12:43 PM
ganpat1956's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,383
Rep Power: 38
ganpat1956 has much to be proud ofganpat1956 has much to be proud ofganpat1956 has much to be proud ofganpat1956 has much to be proud ofganpat1956 has much to be proud ofganpat1956 has much to be proud ofganpat1956 has much to be proud ofganpat1956 has much to be proud ofganpat1956 has much to be proud of
DDA penalised by CIC

The Central Information Commission (CIC) has asked Delhi Development Authority (DDA) to pay Rs 1,750 as fine after its Public Information Officer (PIO) failed to respond to a petition filed under the Right to Information Act within the stipulated seven days.


Holding DDA guilty of taking a ‘dismissive attitude’, the CIC Bench headed by Chief Information Commissioner ordered it to deduct the fine amount from the salary of the erring PIO who did not give information regarding transfer of lease hold rights to the allottees of certain plots.

“This information could have been provided within days of the application, instead of the months that it has taken,” it said, asking DDA to provide information in a week to applicant Pawan Kumar Jain. Terming the information sought by Jain as specific and simple, the CIC said last week that “The supply of the information cannot be circumvented by supplying a copy of the file, which in itself may or may not contain the information sought”.

Considering the apology of the PIO that delay was caused due to heavy work pressure, the Commission said that “The admission makes the PIO liable to penalty... as per provisions of RTI Act”.

Jain had submitted the application to the PIO on October 24 last year seeking information on the stage at which DDA transfers the lease hold and ownership rights to an allottee.
He approached the DDA chief when no response was forthcoming, but this did not help. Eventually, he wrote to the CIC, which not only allowed his appeal but also penalised DDA for the delay and asked it to provide information in a week’s time.

(Source: The Tribune, Dec.11, 2006)

(I observe a key ruling in this news report, that I have highlighted for the members of the RTI community--Ganpat)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-17-2006, 07:41 PM
brijeshbhatt's Avatar
Quite a regular

 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 133
Rep Power: 5
brijeshbhatt will become famous soon enoughbrijeshbhatt will become famous soon enough

Thaks Ganpat bringing this stuff. I think this decision will really help lots of people who are running from pillar to post to obtain information from DDA
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-18-2006, 12:33 PM
maneesh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Kolkata
Posts: 867
Rep Power: 22
maneesh has much to be proud ofmaneesh has much to be proud ofmaneesh has much to be proud ofmaneesh has much to be proud ofmaneesh has much to be proud ofmaneesh has much to be proud ofmaneesh has much to be proud ofmaneesh has much to be proud ofmaneesh has much to be proud of

Thats a great news with correct emphasis which clearly brings out the spirit of RTI.

Last edited by maneesh; 12-18-2006 at 12:43 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
penalised, cic


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads for: DDA penalised by CIC

Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Railway officials penalised ganpat1956 RTI News & Discussion 1 09-27-2007 02:55 PM
PWD officers penalised karira RTI News & Discussion 0 07-05-2007 08:59 PM


Copyrights

New to Site?

Need Help?

Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 Web Technologies by Dr. Kushal Pathak

All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 07:58 PM.



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51