Thread: MPs want FoI
View Single Post

  #1  
Old 04-29-2007, 12:11 AM
ganpat1956's Avatar
ganpat1956 ganpat1956 is offline

 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,327
Rep Power: 38
ganpat1956 has much to be proud ofganpat1956 has much to be proud ofganpat1956 has much to be proud ofganpat1956 has much to be proud ofganpat1956 has much to be proud ofganpat1956 has much to be proud ofganpat1956 has much to be proud ofganpat1956 has much to be proud ofganpat1956 has much to be proud of
MPs want FoI

AN ATTEMPT to make MPs' allowances and expenses exempt from the Freedom of Information Act has been halted.

Former Tory Minister David Maclean claimed his Private Members Bill (which he withdrew today (Friday, 27 April)) was aimed at protecting MPs private correspondence with and about constituents.

But opponents said that was nonsense and the Penrith and the Border MP wanted to stop publication of embarrassing details about their expenses and allowances.

Cambridgeshire MPs David Howarth, Andrew Lansley and Malcolm Moss all made clear their opposition to the move, as did Suffolk West's Richard Spring.

Cambridge City Liberal Democrat MP David Howarth said: "I am opposed to this proposal. Freedom of Information should apply to all public bodies and obviously that should include Parliament."

Liberal Democrat MP Norman Lamb - who angered colleagues by using the FoI Act to obtain and publish the details of MPs travel expenses earlier this year, told the News: "It is nonsense to say it is about protecting MPs correspondence with constituents or government departments."

Cambridgeshire North-East Tory MP Malcolm Moss said: "I don't quite understand what Mr Maclean is trying to do. Correspondence with and about constituents is protected by other legislation."

Mr Spring said: "I am relaxed about publication of MPs' expenses."

CEN News : Region-wide : MPs want FoI
Reply With Quote