Join RTI India!


RTI India Official Toolbar
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Knowingly Wrong reply by PIO,RHC quoting irrelevant orders

  1. #1
    drrathorehs is offline Just Popping In drrathorehs is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    jodhpur
    Posts
    25
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks
    28
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Knowingly Wrong reply by PIO,RHC quoting irrelevant orders

    Sir, I have made an application before Public Information officer of Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur, He is bent upon to reject my all applications on some pretext or other, because that exposes their working. If an institution like High Court behaves in this manner,Where the public will go! Only can Pray to the God.The latest example I am writing here-I gave an application on 09-09-09, the contents were---
    1. Is there, monitoring by the Registry, RHC of Direction/orders by the Hon'ble SC for early hearing or hearing in fixed time e.g. 3 months or 6 months?
    2. Who is the authority responsible for listing these cases before respective Hon'ble courts? Are all these directions or orders are being to this authority by the concern staff.
    3. Who gives the first listing date of these cases in the court, the authority responsible or the staff in section or peshi section?
    4. In how many cases there were directions/ orders for early hearing in or hearing in fixed time by Hon'ble SC for Hon'ble RHC in 2007, if possible the details of these cases in respect of Hon'ble SC direction /Order, date of listing before Hon'ble RHC and the date of final disposal may be provided.
    5. How many cases with direction of Hon'ble SC are still pending before the Hon'ble RHC ?
    6. Is the registry of Hon'ble RHC is taking help of computerisation in maintaining such datas and if not, are they planning to do this?

    THE REPLY GIVEN BY THE PIO, RHC, JODHPUR.
    1. The information asked for cannot be supplied due to reasons given below:-

    (i) As it is a composite application wherein so many informations have been sought on several Subject matters, therefore, application doesnot cover
    in accordance with Sub Rule 1 of Rule 4 of Rajasthan Right to Information(High Court & Subordinate Courts) Rules,2006 and Sub Section 1 of Section 6 of right to Information Act, 2005.
    (ii) Necessary declaration as mentioned in Sub Rule 2 of Rule 10 of Chave not been made by you in the application itself.
    (iii) As regard your application dated 22-09-09, it is to inform that Rajasthan Right to Information(High Court & Subordinate Courts) Rules,2006
    does not permit to remove defects after pointing out the same.

    2. As per section 19 of the Right to Information Act, 2005, you may file an appeal to Appellate Authority within a period of thirty days of issue of this order.
    Sd--------


    In my opinion the reply given by the PIO is absolutely wrong. Either he is doing all this knowingly or because of inefficiency?
    (i) The Rule quoted Sub Rule1 of RUle 4 of Rajasthan Right to Information(High Court & Subordinate Courts) Rules,2006 reads,--
    4. Application for seeking information. - (1) Any person seeking information
    under the Act shall make an application in Form "A' to the Authorized Person along with non Judicial stamp, of Rs. 100 duly affixed on /attached to it, which shall be non refundable.
    Provided that the information relates to tender documents/ bids/ quotations/ business contracts, the application fees shall be Rs. 500 per application.
    So the reply given was absolutely irrelevant and was not in the reference.
    (ii) The declaration was made but it was a photocopy of the performa and on top of it it was mentioned the numbers of some other allplication, but it was signed and date put on the same day of submission of the application.
    (iii) I gave application on 22-09-09 that by mistake the declaration submitted was not in proper order submitted correct declaration. Till that time nothing was communicated to me.
    Thus the both statements in reply are falls.

    It is my personal request to all those who are interested in RTI Act, to guide
    me in dealing these type of people, I have nothing to gain from Rajasthan High Court, but fighting to improve the System in getting Justice.
    By making appeal I am not going to gain much because they all are same.
    Can I make Complaint of this Public Information Officer to Chief Justice of India/ Chief Justice RHC or CIC , to take appropriate action against this gentle man? Kindly guide me how to act in this case now. He has rejected my all nine applications. Making an appeal will costs money and time. Can I follw to paths simultaneously i.e. Making and appeal and making a Complaint also.

    With Warm Regards.

  2.    Sponsored Links


  3. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Secunderabad
    Posts
    16,939
    Blog Entries
    2
    Thanks
    801
    Thanked 4,260 Times in 2,659 Posts

    Re: Knowingly Wrong reply by PIO,RHC quoting irrelevant orders

    It is better to follow the due process even though you do not expect much from it. That way, when the matter goes to the CIC, no one can point a finger at you.

    Therefore, please file a First Appeal.


    Still waiting for your IT refund ?
    Click Here for a RTI solution




  4. The Following User Says Thank You to karira For This Useful Post:


  5. #3
    drrathorehs is offline Just Popping In drrathorehs is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    jodhpur
    Posts
    25
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks
    28
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Re: Knowingly Wrong reply by PIO,RHC quoting irrelevant orders

    Sir,
    As mentioned above the PIO is knowingly giving wrong reply, I have made appeal to FAA but as rightly pointed out nothing is going to be the out come. Can I make a Complaint to CIC before getting the reply of the FAA narrating whole affairs. Wrong interpretation of rules is not expected from Judicial officer.
    Regards,
    dr h s rathore

  6. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Secunderabad
    Posts
    16,939
    Blog Entries
    2
    Thanks
    801
    Thanked 4,260 Times in 2,659 Posts

    Re: Knowingly Wrong reply by PIO,RHC quoting irrelevant orders

    Please wait till you get a order from the FAA.
    Otherwise it is likely that the CIC will remand the matter back to the FAA.


    Still waiting for your IT refund ?
    Click Here for a RTI solution




+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-19-2009, 05:49 PM
  2. No reply and wrong reply even after first appeal for PF
    By mbaphna in forum Ask for RTI Query
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-13-2009, 12:12 AM
  3. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 06-26-2009, 12:32 AM
  4. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-21-2009, 07:23 PM
  5. SIC orders MSU to reply to query under RTI
    By ganpat1956 in forum RTI News & Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-09-2007, 05:55 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

SEO by vBSEO

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161