| Welcome to the RTI India: The complete Online Portal for Right to Information in India. Right to Information has an important economic dimension, as it embraces not only political freedom but also the freedom to lead a life with dignity, unfettered by domination and discrimination. Our aim is to provide authentic and analytical help regarding Right to Information in India to Officers, Lawyers, Citizens, RTI Activist, Associations, & NGO's. Our strength is in bringing them all at one platform. |
This is a discussion on second appeal-what next? within the RTI General Discussions forums, part of the RTI Community Lounge category; Dear Members, Erroneous decision of service periods: Apr 85 to Oct 87& May 89 to April 90 was contested in the Tribunal in 1994, followed by Contempt case in 2001. ...
| New Thread |
| |||||||
89396 Webpages | Register | Tags | Members List | Mark Forums Read |
| Notices |
|
#1
| ||||
| ||||
Dear Members, Erroneous decision of service periods: Apr 85 to Oct 87& May 89 to April 90 was contested in the Tribunal in 1994, followed by Contempt case in 2001. Fresh petition was filed in 2005 but declared time-barred and the High Court dittoed the Judgment. Since Aug 2006 and afterwards, followed by latest RTI application on 15.5.07, information regarding these cases was given, "FILE NOT AVAILABLE BEING TOO OLD". On 2nd appeal, it was argued that the file had been destroyed after preservation period. The 2nd appeal has been disposed off, directing the Public Authority to show the file and if destroyed, to supply the applicant a copy of circular regarding preservation/destruction of record. My contention is that the matter remained sub judice up to Dec 05. As such, the file was definitely alive till then, and was required to be retained for further period, as laid down in the second para of the above circular, for records likely to be used in future. The PA has also said that no record is maintained of the destroyed records, nor any permission from any official is necessary for weeding out of record. Now, what should I do for inspection of the file or for supply of grounds for decision? aamaadmi |
|
#2
| |||||
| |||||
I guess, if second appeal fails, assuming it was with the CIC, New Delhi, then the only way is to knock the HC doors. You should file a petition with the high court against the order... But your 2nd appeal was at the SIC, then you can still go to the CIC with your complaint.
__________________ "First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win." --------------------------------- M.K.Gandhi |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
Quote:
Jurisdictions of State Commissions and Central Commissions are mutually exclusive. So one may not move from one commission to other. Sidharth |
|
#4
| |||||
| |||||
You have stated that " The PA has also said that no record is maintained of the destroyed records nor any permission from any official is necessry for weeding out of records " This is contradictory to the prevelent office procedure. I don't think any responsible official will give a written reply like that. Kindly get documentary evidence of above statement. Myself being out from service since long am not in a position to quote the relevant provisions of Rules. Some of the lerned members of this forum will be able to provide you the exact details of orders. |
![]() |
| Tags |
| high court, second appeal |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| RTI Application/First Appeal/Second Appeal Fees and Mode of Payment | karira | RTI General Discussions | 13 | 03-25-2008 06:59 PM |
Copyrights | New to Site? | Need Help? |
|
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 Web Technologies by Dr. Kushal Pathak |