| Welcome to the RTI India: The complete Online Portal for Right to Information in India. Right to Information has an important economic dimension, as it embraces not only political freedom but also the freedom to lead a life with dignity, unfettered by domination and discrimination. Our aim is to provide authentic and analytical help regarding Right to Information in India to Officers, Lawyers, Citizens, RTI Activist, Associations, & NGO's. Our strength is in bringing them all at one platform. |
This is a discussion on Volcker Report (Oil for Food Scam) related letter... within the Appeals & decisions forums, part of the RTI News, Circulars and Decisions category; There is a interesting recent decision of the CIC regarding disclosing a letter received from the Indian Ambassador to Iraq. 1. Applicant referred to statement of Shri Chidambaram, in Parliament, ...
| New Thread |
| |||||||
104356 Webpages | Register | Tags | Meet Our Staff | Members List | Mark Forums Read |
| Notices |
|
#1
| |||||
| |||||
There is a interesting recent decision of the CIC regarding disclosing a letter received from the Indian Ambassador to Iraq. 1. Applicant referred to statement of Shri Chidambaram, in Parliament, referring to a particular letter sent by the Indan Ambassador to Iraq. Applicant wanted a copy of that letter from Ministry of External Affairs. 2. CPIO denied information under Section 8(1)(h) (ongoing investigation). 3. Applicant argued in his First Appeal that: - The concerned letter is not a matter of investigation but the involvement of some Indians is a a matter of investigation. - No investigation has ever been ordered against the said letter.Ministry cannot claim that each and every bit of correspondence is under investigation - Non disclosure will only facilitate a cover up. 4. The First AA suddenly turned around and said that the exemption under Sec 8(1)(h) was a typographical error. It should be actually Sec 8(1)(a) ! (Please note that the by this time, the CPIO, who initially replied to the applicant, had himself become AA !) 5. The first IC hearing the case (Dr O P Kejriwal) recused himself from the case due to his personal contacts with the applicant. Case was transferred to CIC Shri W. Habibullah. 6. The CIC wanted to know as to how Sec 8(1)(a) is applicable if nowhere has a mention been made by CPIO or AA of the foreign country, etc. It also gave the supremacy of one's rights over Sec 8, which allows for denial of information. CIC has now asked for a copy of the letter so that they can examine it and decide for its disclosure or not. The full decision can be read here: http://cic.gov.in/CIC-Orders/Decision_28032008_06.pdf Last edited by karira; 03-31-2008 at 05:55 PM. |
|
#2
| |||||
| |||||
As reported on zeenews.com on 01 April 2008: Zee News - cic CIC to govt: Place Ambassador`s letters on Oil-for-food scam New Delhi, March 31: The Central Information Commission has directed the Centre to present before it copies of letters sent by Indian Ambassador in Iraq to the government in 2004 allegedly giving details on non-contractual beneficiaries in the Oil-for-food scam. The Commission passed the order on an RTI application filed by Bangalore-resident Arun Kumar Agrawal who was denied the details on the ground that divulging the information would affect India's relations with Iraq. Observing that the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) is silent as to how it would affect the relations with Iraq, the CIC decided to go through the letters to verify the government's stand. "(The Ministry's reply) is silent as to in what manner the disclosure will affect relations with the foreign states... For these reasons, information officer MEA is directed to present the letters for our examination in a sealed cover," the Chief Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah said. Agrawal in his application had sought disclosure of letters from then Indian Ambassador to Iraq dated January 28 2004. He contended some private entities were involved in the scam and the information sought by him would exposing them. |
|
#3
| |||||
| |||||
In a subsequent decision, CIC has allowed disclosure of the letter mentioned in the above posts. The full decision is attached. |
|
#4
| |||||
| |||||
Please also read the following related thread: http://www.rtiindia.org/forum/7170-w...html#post24135 |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
| ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| some questions related to education and RTI | arnav | RTI General Discussions | 2 | 09-22-2008 05:17 AM |
| career related | kktal | Ask for Framing an RTI Question | 7 | 04-01-2008 02:16 PM |
| Use RTI to avoid adulterated food | karira | RTI News & Discussion | 0 | 01-14-2008 04:56 PM |
| using of letter head | sunil sri | Ask for RTI Query | 13 | 07-18-2007 07:50 AM |
| Karnataka villagers insist on Right to Food | maneesh | Success Stories | 0 | 02-20-2007 10:48 AM |
Copyrights | New to Site? | Need Help? |
|
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 Web Technologies by Dr. Kushal Pathak |