RTI India Join Big Helpers! Donate to RTI India!


Welcome to the RTI India: The complete Online Portal for Right to Information in India.

Right to Information has an important economic dimension, as it embraces not only political freedom but also the freedom to lead a life with dignity, unfettered by domination and discrimination.

Our aim is to provide authentic and analytical help regarding Right to Information in India to Officers, Lawyers, Citizens, RTI Activist, Associations, & NGO's. Our strength is in bringing them all at one platform.

Join RTI India!

Some important points raised......rejected by CIC because not "information"

This is a discussion on Some important points raised......rejected by CIC because not "information" within the Appeals & decisions forums, part of the RTI News, Circulars and Decisions category; Applicant raised some important points with CIC but unfortunately did not draft the application and/or First Appeal properly. The First Appeal rejected because what was asked, was not considered as ...


RTI India Official Toolbar
New Thread
Go Back   RTI India > RTI News, Circulars and Decisions > Appeals & decisions

104356 Webpages

Register Tags Meet Our Staff Members List Mark Forums Read
Notices

  #1  
Old 04-01-2008, 01:40 PM
karira's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Secunderabad
Posts: 4,742
Rep Power: 59
karira is an unknown quantity at this pointkarira is an unknown quantity at this pointkarira is an unknown quantity at this pointkarira is an unknown quantity at this pointkarira is an unknown quantity at this pointkarira is an unknown quantity at this pointkarira is an unknown quantity at this pointkarira is an unknown quantity at this point
Some important points raised......rejected by CIC because not "information"

Applicant raised some important points with CIC but unfortunately did not draft the application and/or First Appeal properly.

The First Appeal rejected because what was asked, was not considered as "information":

http://cic.gov.in/CIC-Orders/FAAD_25032008_02.pdf:

(i) Since information was not provided to him in ID No. 9 dated 27.07.2006 in respect of question No. 4(a) as well as in respect of Shri Bhanwar Singh even as on date despite enlightening the CIC of all developments and when they occurred, hat made the CIC to close the case ?
(ii) Under what rule of the RTI Act, 2005 was the PIO absolved of his charges despite having not provided the information, as sought, till date ?
(iii) Name, designation, address and Tele. No. of the Ist Appellate Authority to whom the applicant can approach for the redressal of grievances against CIC ?
(iv) Can the CIC again be approached in its capacity on 2nd Appellate Authority against itself ?
(v) Appointment with Shri Wajahat Habibullah Saheb, Chief Information Commissioner.
(vi) In case where the CIC also fails to help the applicant in seeking information and closes the case, who is the authority to be approached ?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to karira For This Useful Post:
rajub (09-19-2008)
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads for: Some important points raised......rejected by CIC because not "information"

Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Information that has to be "created" or "collected", cannot be denied under RTI.... karira RTI News & Discussion 5 09-05-2008 01:06 PM
"The Central Information Commission (Management) Regulations, 2007" karira Site Feedback 4 08-07-2008 07:50 PM
Change Conceptfrom "Why Give " To " Why Not Give " colnrkurup RTI General Discussions 3 03-31-2008 01:39 PM
AA rules that CPIO cannot give information since he was holding only an "additional charge" karira RTI General Discussions 4 08-27-2007 05:33 PM
DoPT portal "misleads" President`s office on file notings ganpat1956 RTI News & Discussion 0 03-28-2007 02:44 AM


Copyrights

New to Site?

Need Help?

Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 Web Technologies by Dr. Kushal Pathak

All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 03:57 AM.



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51