RTI India Join Big Helpers! Donate to RTI India!


Welcome to the RTI India: The complete Online Portal for Right to Information in India.

Right to Information has an important economic dimension, as it embraces not only political freedom but also the freedom to lead a life with dignity, unfettered by domination and discrimination.

Our aim is to provide authentic and analytical help regarding Right to Information in India to Officers, Lawyers, Citizens, RTI Activist, Associations, & NGO's. Our strength is in bringing them all at one platform.

Join RTI India!

Another "toss it back" decision from CIC

This is a discussion on Another "toss it back" decision from CIC within the Appeals & decisions forums, part of the RTI News, Circulars and Decisions category; There seems to be no end to the "tossing back" by CIC . http://cic.gov.in/CIC-Orders/PB-15052008-17.pdf RTI Application date: 18 Aug 2006 CPIO's reply date: Not indicated in CIC order First Appeal ...


RTI India Official Toolbar
New Thread
Go Back   RTI India > RTI News, Circulars and Decisions > Appeals & decisions

104356 Webpages

Register Tags Meet Our Staff Members List Mark Forums Read
Notices

  #1  
Old 05-18-2008, 07:08 AM
karira's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Secunderabad
Posts: 4,742
Rep Power: 59
karira is an unknown quantity at this pointkarira is an unknown quantity at this pointkarira is an unknown quantity at this pointkarira is an unknown quantity at this pointkarira is an unknown quantity at this pointkarira is an unknown quantity at this pointkarira is an unknown quantity at this pointkarira is an unknown quantity at this point
Another "toss it back" decision from CIC

There seems to be no end to the "tossing back" by CIC.

http://cic.gov.in/CIC-Orders/PB-15052008-17.pdf

RTI Application date: 18 Aug 2006
CPIO's reply date: Not indicated in CIC order
First Appeal date: 15 Jan 2007
Response from FAA: NO RESPONSE
Second Appeal date: 12 Sep 2007
CIC calls for comments from PA: 22 Nov 2007
PA's comments date: 17 Dec 2007
Appellants rejoinder date: 16 Jan 2008
Date of CIC order: 15 May 2008

And the order of IC Padma Balasubramanian is:

"I have gone though the RTI request, CPIO reply as well as comments of the Public Authority. I find that information in respect of point 1 to 5 and 7 has been denied under various Sub-Sections of Section 8(1) of the RTI Act. I have also noted that the first appeal filed by the appellant is still pending with the AA. I direct the AA to dispose of the same within 15 days of the receipt of this direction. In case, the appellant is not satisfied with the decision of the AA, he can approach the Commission again, as per the provisions of the RTI Act. On the above lines the appeal is disposed of."

Pertinent to note that the applicant has already waited for 21 months after filing the RTI Application and still no result !

No wonder applicants will behave in the CIC like this one:

http://www.rtiindia.org/forum/4028-central-information-commission-directs-public-information-officer-file-case-against-appellant.html

PS: Manoj, I am sure this is indefensible, even by you !

PPS: Where did the "comments from the Public Authority" come from ?
Only CPIO and the AA can offer comments. There is no provision in the RTI Act for the Public Authority to offer comments.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-18-2008, 07:14 AM
karira's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Secunderabad
Posts: 4,742
Rep Power: 59
karira is an unknown quantity at this pointkarira is an unknown quantity at this pointkarira is an unknown quantity at this pointkarira is an unknown quantity at this pointkarira is an unknown quantity at this pointkarira is an unknown quantity at this pointkarira is an unknown quantity at this pointkarira is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Another "toss it back" decision from CIC

May 15, 2008, seems to be "toss back day" for IC Padma Balasubramanian.

There are several of these "toss back" decisions.

Here are some more:

http://cic.gov.in/CIC-Orders/PB-15052008-16.pdf

http://cic.gov.in/CIC-Orders/PB-15052008-05.pdf

http://cic.gov.in/CIC-Orders/PB-15052008-04.pdf

Last edited by karira; 05-18-2008 at 07:33 AM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-12-2008, 11:57 PM
Anil Sood's Avatar
Just Popping In

 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Pitam pura, Delhi
Age: 47
Posts: 38
Rep Power: 2
Anil Sood is on a distinguished road
Re: Another "toss it back" decision from CIC

I had also got a order from IC PB which was not meant for me. But the order was sent to me. It took 3 telephone calls and one personal visit to inform them that they should send the order to the right persons. The original order is still with me.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-13-2008, 01:26 AM
taurus's Avatar
Just can't stay Away

 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 498
Rep Power: 6
taurus is on a distinguished road
Re: Another "toss it back" decision from CIC

Before remitting back one must see how long the applicant has waited and with what result. I wonder who all need sensitisation of the Act.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-01-2008, 07:51 PM
navdeep's Avatar
Name: Navdeep Gupta
Just Popping In

 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Chandigarh
Age: 40
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 1
navdeep is on a distinguished road
Re: Another "toss it back" decision from CIC

It is pertinent to mention here that since First Appellate Authority had not replied to First Appeal knowingly, remanding back the case to FAA is strictly against law of natural justice. Why FAA has been given opportunity again to deny information on vague grounds and RTI applicant harassed again. Once the case reached to Honorable CIC, I think it must be decided there and then only.

Thanks
Navdeep

Quote:
Originally Posted by karira View Post
There seems to be no end to the "tossing back" by CIC.

http://cic.gov.in/CIC-Orders/PB-15052008-17.pdf

RTI Application date: 18 Aug 2006
CPIO's reply date: Not indicated in CIC order
First Appeal date: 15 Jan 2007
Response from FAA: NO RESPONSE
Second Appeal date: 12 Sep 2007
CIC calls for comments from PA: 22 Nov 2007
PA's comments date: 17 Dec 2007
Appellants rejoinder date: 16 Jan 2008
Date of CIC order: 15 May 2008

And the order of IC Padma Balasubramanian is:

"I have gone though the RTI request, CPIO reply as well as comments of the Public Authority. I find that information in respect of point 1 to 5 and 7 has been denied under various Sub-Sections of Section 8(1) of the RTI Act. I have also noted that the first appeal filed by the appellant is still pending with the AA. I direct the AA to dispose of the same within 15 days of the receipt of this direction. In case, the appellant is not satisfied with the decision of the AA, he can approach the Commission again, as per the provisions of the RTI Act. On the above lines the appeal is disposed of."

Pertinent to note that the applicant has already waited for 21 months after filing the RTI Application and still no result !

No wonder applicants will behave in the CIC like this one:

http://www.rtiindia.org/forum/4028-central-information-commission-directs-public-information-officer-file-case-against-appellant.html

PS: Manoj, I am sure this is indefensible, even by you !

PPS: Where did the "comments from the Public Authority" come from ?
Only CPIO and the AA can offer comments. There is no provision in the RTI Act for the Public Authority to offer comments.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to navdeep For This Useful Post:
vijendra singh (09-03-2008)
  #6  
Old 09-08-2008, 09:56 PM
jiwateshwar's Avatar
Name: J Singh
Just can't stay Away

 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chinchpokli
Posts: 363
Rep Power: 0
jiwateshwar is on a distinguished road
Re: Another "toss it back" decision from CIC

Something very important I would like to bring to the attention of members of this forum. Whenever you fail to get a hearing from the FAA, then do not file a simple second appeal. File a appeal+complaint.

How to do that?
In the grounds of appeal include reasons given under ss18(1) and ss19(1) both. Very clearly mention in your appeal that the FAA has acted with malafide intent in denying you a hearing. When the FAA is made a respondent, the case can not be sent back to the FAA.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-08-2008, 10:44 PM
karira's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Secunderabad
Posts: 4,742
Rep Power: 59
karira is an unknown quantity at this pointkarira is an unknown quantity at this pointkarira is an unknown quantity at this pointkarira is an unknown quantity at this pointkarira is an unknown quantity at this pointkarira is an unknown quantity at this pointkarira is an unknown quantity at this pointkarira is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Another "toss it back" decision from CIC

Besides what Jiwateshwar said, please BOLDLY title the first page as:

Second Appeal under Section........ CUM Complaint under Section.....

Please also see:

Catch 22 situation......need help

(at least the initial posts ...because after that the thread somewhat veers off the main topic)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads for: Another "toss it back" decision from CIC

Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Information that has to be "created" or "collected", cannot be denied under RTI.... karira RTI News & Discussion 5 09-05-2008 01:06 PM
"The Central Information Commission (Management) Regulations, 2007" karira Site Feedback 4 08-07-2008 07:50 PM
Change Conceptfrom "Why Give " To " Why Not Give " colnrkurup RTI General Discussions 3 03-31-2008 01:39 PM
AA rules that CPIO cannot give information since he was holding only an "additional charge" karira RTI General Discussions 4 08-27-2007 05:33 PM
DoPT portal "misleads" President`s office on file notings ganpat1956 RTI News & Discussion 0 03-28-2007 02:44 AM


Copyrights

New to Site?

Need Help?

Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 Web Technologies by Dr. Kushal Pathak

All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 07:01 AM.



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51