Are judges holidaying at public expense?

[sidmis]

Are judges holidaying at public expense?
Reported by Meetu Jain / CNN-IBN on Tue, May 20, 2008 at 20:09, in Nation section

BENDING RULES? An RTI application shows how judges have gone for
holidays at government expense.

New Delhi: The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, KG Balakrishnan,
wants judges to be kept out of the purview of the Right To Information
(RTI) Act.

Now an RTI application put in by CNN-IBN has thrown up interesting
details of how judges have been traveling abroad, often for personal
holidays at government expense.

Ironically the urge to travel starts at the top. Balakrishnan, after
taking over as Chief Justice, made at least seven trips abroad in 2007
traveling First Class with his wife with the air fare alone costing
over Rs 39 lakh.

For instance, during his 11-day trip to Pretoria, South Africa in
August 2007, the Chief Justice took the following route - Delhi,
Dubai, Johannesburg, Nelspruit, Capetown, Johannesburg, Victoria
Falls, where the judge finally didn't go and returned via Dubai to
Delhi.

The air fare alone cost Rs 5.70 lakh and did not include the stay, TA,
DA or Entertainment Allowance. Entertainment Allowance itself was over
Rs 80,000.

Government rules permit travel only by the shortest route, yet the
Prime Ministers Office, which sanctions these trips, did not ask why
the Chief Justice wanted to go to tourist destinations like Nelspruit,
Capetown or Victoria Falls.

Union Law Minister HR Bhardwaj says, " They also need comfort, they
also need to go out. Why they should be deprived of it.''
And what about government rules that say judges cannot be accompanied
by wives on work tours?

"How can you deprive the wife? You are a woman. You should
understand," Bhardwaj tells the CNN-IBN correspondent.

Former chief justice YK Sabharwal's foreign travel was no different.
The judge attended three conferences in 2005 to Edinburgh, Washington
and Paris.

While the conferences lasted 11 days, Sabharwal was out for 38 days
with 21 days converted into a private visit.

The travel plan includes a detour from Washington to Baltimore,
Orlando and Atlanta, before rejoining the conference route in Paris.
The First Class air fare for Sabharwal entire trip was paid by the
Central government.

The other judges too have traveled abroad costing the exchequer huge
sums of money. Supreme Court judges Justices PP Naolekar and AK Mathur
could not find a direct flight to Bangkok in November 2007.

Are judges holidaying at public expense?

[karira]

Here is Page 2 of the above report:

Both judges and their wives spent Rs 5.5 lakh traveling First Class from Delhi to Kuala Lumpur to Bangkok to Singapore to Delhi.

This does not include 5-Star stay or the Entertainment Allowance of Rs 84,000 paid for a seven-day trip, even though the conference took just three days.

RTI queries have revealed other judges who spent big on single trips include:

* Justice Ashok Bhan and wife: Rs 13.66 lakh on air fare in 2006.

* Justice Arijit Passayat and wife: Rs 13.01 lakhs in 2006.

* Justice HK Sema and wife: a single trip in 2007 that cost Rs 11.84 lakh

* Justice BN Agarwal and wife took a trip in 2006 that cost Rs 11.77 lakh

* Justice KG Balakrishnan and wife in 2006 as well, who cost the exchequer Rs 13 lakh.

The Supreme Court has an annual budget of Rs 1.65 crore for the foreign tours of its 26 judges, which is meant for important judicial conferences.

But who decides which conferences are important, whether spouses can go along, or whether private holidays can also be thrown in?

The details of foreign tours of the higher judiciary have been a secret until this RTI application.

While the Chief Justice might be against the judiciary coming under the purview of the RTI Act, the fact is it is the tax payer which is funding a majority of the tours of our judges.

[karira]

As reported by Meetu Jain (with inpouts from Prabhakar Kumar) in ibnlive.com on 22 May 2008:
Bring judges under RTI purview: Activists

New Delhi: CNN-IBN's exclusive report on some judges using official trips to holiday, has sparked off the debate - should judges be above the purview of the Right to Information (RTI) Act?

RTI activists say there is every reason why the RTI Act should apply to the higher judiciary as well.

Questions are now being asked in South Block, too, following the expose on Supreme Court judges.

Records obtained under the RTI shows judges have been converting work trips to holidays, taking long detours and are accompanied by their wives while traveling abroad.

At present there are no travel guidelines for the judiciary and the Bar Council of India is suggesting a course correction.

"I think the judges must pay or should pay the amount to the government," Bar Council of India Chairman SNP Sinha said in Patna on Wednesday.

Under the RTI, CNN-IBN found that for Chief Justice KG Balakrishnan's 11-day trip to Pretoria, South Africa in August 2007 the route was - Delhi, Dubai, Johannesburg, Nelspruit, Capetown, Johannesburg, Victoria Falls, where the judge finally didn't go and back to Delhi via Dubai.

Former chief justice YK Sabharwal attended three conferences in 2005 to Edinburgh, Washington and Paris. While the conferences lasted 11 days, Sabharwal was out for 38 days with 21 days converted into a private visit.

The travel plan included a detour from Washington to Baltimore, Orlando and Atlanta, before rejoining the conference route in Paris.

The First Class air fare for Sabharwal's entire trip was paid by the government.

Activists are now renewing the debate on the RTI act applying to judges as well

RTI activist Arvind Kejriwal said: "It only underscores why the RTI needs to be applied to judges and judiciary."

Just like Caesar’s wife should be above suspicion, RTI activists are demanding that SC judges too should be seen to be accountable.