| Welcome to the RTI India: The complete Online Portal for Right to Information in India. Right to Information has an important economic dimension, as it embraces not only political freedom but also the freedom to lead a life with dignity, unfettered by domination and discrimination. Our aim is to provide authentic and analytical help regarding Right to Information in India to Officers, Lawyers, Citizens, RTI Activist, Associations, & NGO's. Our strength is in bringing them all at one platform. |
This is a discussion on RTI overrules earlier govt decisions on secrecy? within the RTI News & Discussion forums, part of the RTI News, Circulars and Decisions category; As reported by Rakesh Bhatnagar in dnaindia.com on 27 May 2008: DNA - India - RTI overrules earlier govt decisions on secrecy? - Daily News & Analysis RTI overrules earlier ...
| New Thread |
| |||||||
104356 Webpages | Register | Tags | Meet Our Staff | Members List | Mark Forums Read |
| Notices |
|
#1
| |||||
| |||||
As reported by Rakesh Bhatnagar in dnaindia.com on 27 May 2008: DNA - India - RTI overrules earlier govt decisions on secrecy? - Daily News & Analysis RTI overrules earlier govt decisions on secrecy? NEW DELHI: Does the RTI Act supersede the decisions of former ministers not to disclose certain bits of information to the parliament? Would disclosing it amount to a breach of privilege of the parliament? This peculiar question, though one with serious ramifications, has arisen out the Union home ministry denying insignificant information regarding the properties left behind by former ruler of Udaipur over 50 years ago, on grounds that that the disclosure would amount to breach of parliament privilege, as the then Union home minister YB Chavan had told parliament on November 15, 1967 that the “government has been of the view that the details of the property, recognised as private property of the rulers, should not be a matter for public disclosure.” The Central Information Commission has referred the question to Lok Sabha speaker Somnath Chatterjee’s for his final views on the matter. The CIC request is a fallout of 75-year-old Basanti Lal Singhvi’s request saying he has to submit the details of Saheliyon Ki Bari estate to the state district magistrate, Udaipur in his personal property suit. Though the requested information looks innocent as it comes within the purview of the Right to Information Act that ensures that the authorities can’t withhold any information that is 20 years old, the home ministry’s citing breach of privilege to deny information . |
![]() |
| Tags |
| breach, ent privilege, parliam, udaipur |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| No random use of secrecy clause: RTI | karira | RTI News & Discussion | 1 | 01-19-2008 08:08 PM |
| Secrecy veil off cabinet | sidmis | RTI News & Discussion | 1 | 10-17-2007 10:46 AM |
| Prisoners of secrecy | karira | RTI General Discussions | 0 | 06-19-2007 11:10 AM |
| Ontario secrecy provision nixed | ganpat1956 | International RTI's | 0 | 05-29-2007 08:13 PM |
| SECRECY IS BRED in the bones of politicians and bureaucrats. | avdhesh | International RTI's | 2 | 11-17-2006 07:57 PM |
Copyrights | New to Site? | Need Help? |
|
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 Web Technologies by Dr. Kushal Pathak |