View Single Post

  #10  
Old 08-28-2007, 08:52 PM
mpai's Avatar
mpai mpai is offline
Just can't stay Away

 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Age: 46
Posts: 308
Rep Power: 8
mpai is a jewel in the roughmpai is a jewel in the roughmpai is a jewel in the roughmpai is a jewel in the rough
Re: If called by CIC would the applicant get Reimbursement of TA etc

Here is a gist on CIC decisions, where the appellants were compensated.

Rs.5,000 to Shri Awadhesh Singh, Village Ranipur Colliery, P.O. Narayanpur, Dist.Purulia by Shri Deepak Chakravarti, Chairman-cum-Managing Director, Eastern Coalfields Limited 02032007_01 dtd.03.07.07 F.No.CIC/AT/C/2006/00117 Dated, the 2nd March, 2007

Shri Ajay Jhuria, Mumbai to and from Mumbai to Delhi 2nd AC train fact and DA of Rs.500/- No.CIC/OK/A/2006/000303 Dated: 3 May 2007

Respondents were directed to compensate him by paying Rs.10,000/- which will cover his journey from Mumbai to Delhi by air (this is essential as pointed out by the Appellant that Railway reservations are practically impossible to get during this peak season) and towards D.A for his stay in Delhi. 1 Shri Joy Manglani, Mumbai-400053 No.CIC/OK/A/2006/00505 Dated: 3 May 2007

A total of Rs.130/- (Rupees one hundred and thirty) shall be remitted to the applicant as compensation by the PIO within 15 days from the date of receipt of this order Dr. Reeta Jayasankar of Kochi F.No.CIC/AT/C/2006/00052 Dated, the 4th September, 2006

Shri Kumar Avikal Manu, a large sun (The total amount) thus payable to the complainant should be determined on the basis of the date of joining of the third and last candidate in the physically handicapped category till December 21, 2006, Decision No.519/IC(A)/2007 F. No.CIC/MA/A/2006/00781 Dated, the 6th February, 2007


SHri Girish Mittal, Mumbai v/s Regional Passport Office, Mumbai. The Commission, therefore, directs the Respondents to compensate the Appellant by a refund of Rs.300/ No.CIC/OK/C/2006/00146 Dated: 7 February 2007

More later

Manoj
Reply With Quote