The study report of Transparency International and other organisations that corruption in India is reduced now is far from reality. On the contrary the corruption in India is increased. Then what about the study report ? They are following their old methods of identifying corruption and the modus operandii of coruption itself has changed. Earlier there wee not much problem in asking or accepting the bribe. Now due to various factors, the corrupt cannot ask bribe. They resort to a diferent system. They just donot ask any bribe. Instead, one find that his work delayed or not done and the corupt bureaucrate or other just pose various problems in getting the things done. If one make frequent visists, the Peon or someone like will approach the aggrived, sympathise with him and direct him to someone else who can help him. That person welcome him whole-heartedly and promissto arrange the things done for a consideration. He know how to accept the 'consideation' undetected and direct him to the corrupt person who has been not geting the things done sofar. In between things are arranged. When the aggrieved approach the corrupt public servant,things will be done with a comment that he is doing it out of sympathy and human considertion despite all his difficulties. He does not mention anything about the bribe. How will the Transparency International or other organisations engaged in the survey detect this bribe ? Right to Informatin Act has not made even a dent on the corruption due to corruption in the selection ofthe custodians itself. Unless we make the
RTI Act effective by appointing honest and capable persons at the helm of affairs, Ke...zara...zara...