Hello everybody,
First of all i thanks all the members for their valuable suggestions..
After a month i go a reply to my 1st appeal on below issue.. Its a 2 page history given by the Appellate auth in the sections like :
1. Appeal hearing
2. Analysis
3. Order
In the appeal hearing section, it is the entire history of the information asked along the letter nos & reply given to us.
In the analsysis section, the appellate auth. says that ' The appellant should have been given the reply on each of the points raised by the applicant.
The PIO have not applied his mind while rejecting the information'
A surprising reply from Asst. Commissioner, BMC (Appellete Authority)
Morever, in the order section they have written that they will seek the owner of the said hotel abt the questions asked by us, & then we will be given the information after considering his (owner of hotel) views within 15 days..
Is the appellate auth. has passed the proper order ?
Why they are considering his view ? Offcourse he will deny them for providing the information to us..
Should we wait for 15 days & then put 2nd appeal to
CIC ?
Pls suggest..
Thanks in advance.
//Nikhil