What should be the next step ?

[abhijeet]

Recently one of our friends has received decision of FAA , in which the SPIO admitted that a false statement was furnished previously (inadvertently) and it was regretted. But the point is, that specific false 'information ' was provided to different persons and at least thrice the statement was mentioned, by the same person. How many times a SPIO is allowed to furnish 'false statement ' by the Hon'ble SIC , is not really known to me. Would any member suggest me what should be the next step and how a complaint / appeal is to be drafted , specially when it is a well known fact that the SIC is very soft towards the SPIO .

[nile0611]

You complaint directly to SIC ask them to penalize the SPIO for giving false reply. SPIO would have to reply for the same during the hearing.

[karira]

Apart from what Nile mentioned, please also state in your appeal (and give evidence, if possible) about the SPIO giving false statement thrice.

[poonam agarwal]

In addition to what karira sir had said plz make a fresh application saying "it appears that information /statement given by you appears wrong . plZ CONFIRM THAT INFORMATION IS CORRECT OR WRONG " trap him in his own web.

[abhijeet]

Expert and experienced RTI activists of our state suggested me that the complaint will be futile , as the PIO had corrected the information after 1st hearing and moreover our Hon'ble SIC does not like to impose penalty to the concerned PIO .
The PIO is very influential and has got connection with some -------
In spite of that I would like to submit a complaint having receiving the proper suggestion from your side.