Section and there subsections

[jiwateshwar]

Dear Administrators,
I'm myself a new member of this forum but (over)actively involved here. Though my experience around the forum has been limited, but there are a few things I found which could be improved upon. I understand that the Admin might have there own reasons for keeping things the way they are, however, these are mere suggestions.

1. The "All About RTI" frame in the homepage is really very good and answers most of the queries a novice might have regarding RTI. However, I find that it would be nice if a separate part of the forum could be dedicated to the discussing all the sub-section and there sub-sections. Such as 7.1 and 7.2 should be seperate threads. This might bring about a deeper insight into the whole act. Also there are parts of the act which are still nto understood by most of us. (take for example ss5.4 and 5.5)

2. The tag feature is not used by many members of the forum. I suggest that users be made aware of what this is and how it benefits us. Moreover the poster should include the section /seb-section the post is about in the tag.

If implemented, these shall make the information much more easily accessible and meaningful as searching through all threads is a tedious task.

[hkdubey]

I too find it difficult.
Actually Sections and Sub Sections should be visible So that it will be easy to know the classification. I have already posted my views in wrong place now I fear to Write any thing in out of fear that I am going to commit mistake in classification. Because I am increasing work load of Ganpat.
I suggest the following way in case there is space problem is there This can be done as in Folder and subfolder in Explorer one can know the presence of Section and sub section with a + or arrow sign in the menu.
1. Announcement (Incase mouse kept over this the Sub Section should be visible)
1.1 Announcement(Incase mouse kept this the thread should be visible)
1.1.1 Thread 1
1.1.2 Thread 2
1.2 Announcement Discussion



2 News
2.1
2.1.1
2.2.2
2.2



3. Support
3.1
3.1.1
3.1.2
3.2
3.2.1
etc
I think in this case the mistake in classifaication will be less. The Nos can be replaced with bullets

[jiwateshwar]

Just so that things remain clear, i would like to state that i was actually referring to the section and subsection of the RTI Act.

[hkdubey]

Sorry I thought of The site

[colnrkurup]

Though the recent circular of DoPT brought to our notice by you amply clear Sections 5.4 and 5.5 of the Act, shall we discuss any other aspects of these sections neeeding clarification ?