| Welcome to the RTI India: The complete Online Portal for Right to Information in India. Right to Information has an important economic dimension, as it embraces not only political freedom but also the freedom to lead a life with dignity, unfettered by domination and discrimination. Our aim is to provide authentic and analytical help regarding Right to Information in India to Officers, Lawyers, Citizens, RTI Activist, Associations, & NGO's. Our strength is in bringing them all at one platform. |
This is a discussion on Home Secretary asked to warn officer on delay within the RTI News & Discussion forums, part of the RTI News, Circulars and Decisions category; Home Secretary asked to warn officer on delay As reported in the Hindu New Delhi (PTI): The Central Information Commission has asked Union Home Secretary Madhukar Gupta to issue a ...
| New Thread |
| |||||||
104356 Webpages | Register | Tags | Meet Our Staff | Members List | Mark Forums Read |
| Notices |
|
#1
| |||||
| |||||
Home Secretary asked to warn officer on delay As reported in the Hindu New Delhi (PTI): The Central Information Commission has asked Union Home Secretary Madhukar Gupta to issue a warning to a ministry official for a delay in responding to an RTI application. "It is recommended to Madhukar Gupta, secretary, MHA, that he issue a warning under the Civil Service Conduct rule to P K Kaul to ensure that his disposal of RTI applications in future adheres to the requirement of the Act," Chief Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah said. The Commission passed its direction after it was pointed out that Kaul had not replied to a RTI plea filed by Swaran Kaur on the issue of freedom fighters' pension. Kaul cannot escape the responsibility for servicing this application as he became aware of it on the day he took charge, Habibullah said, dismissing his plea that the time limit of the application had lapsed before it reached him. Taking a serious view of the delay in processing the RTI application, the CIC said that the liability of Kaul arose from his inability to enforce his own orders which were to be complied with by section officer D K Saxena. During the hearing, Saxena wrote a letter to the CIC regretting the "inadvertent" delay in responding to Kaur's RTI plea. He also sought leniency from the Commission, submitting that he has now retired from service. "It is not our practice to consider superannuation as a reasonable cause not to impose penalties on those who have retired from service," the Commission said. Noting that Kaul's liability in financial terms was obscure, the Commission let him off with the direction to the Home Secretary to issue a warning to the officer to ensure that processing of RTI pleas was done in compliance with the Act. The Hindu News Update Service |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Can a Secretary ask for any information? | nile0611 | Ask for RTI Query | 46 | 08-10-2008 04:34 PM |
| CIC slaps Rs 25,000 fine on officer for delay in RTI reply | sidmis | RTI News & Discussion | 5 | 08-09-2008 10:23 PM |
| Officer fined for delay in giving information under RTI Act | sidmis | RTI News & Discussion | 0 | 03-31-2008 08:41 AM |
| Maharashtra guv to pay for home trips | karira | RTI News & Discussion | 0 | 12-11-2007 09:17 AM |
| Passport officer to pay Rs 25,000 for delay | karira | RTI News & Discussion | 1 | 05-31-2007 05:44 PM |
Copyrights | New to Site? | Need Help? |
|
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 Web Technologies by Dr. Kushal Pathak |