| Welcome to the RTI India: The complete Online Portal for Right to Information in India. Right to Information has an important economic dimension, as it embraces not only political freedom but also the freedom to lead a life with dignity, unfettered by domination and discrimination. Our aim is to provide authentic and analytical help regarding Right to Information in India to Officers, Lawyers, Citizens, RTI Activist, Associations, & NGO's. Our strength is in bringing them all at one platform. |
This is a discussion on Court fines RTI applicant within the RTI News & Discussion forums, part of the RTI News, Circulars and Decisions category; VADODARA: A self-proclaimed activist in Anand has created a ticklish situation by applying for information under Right to Information ( RTI ) Act on alleged bribe accepted by a judge ...
| New Thread |
| |||||||
76512 Webpages | Register | Tags | Members List | Mark Forums Read |
| Notices |
|
#1
| |||||
| |||||
VADODARA: A self-proclaimed activist in Anand has created a ticklish situation by applying for information under Right to Information (RTI) Act on alleged bribe accepted by a judge to dismiss his complaint. The activist was slapped a fine of Rs 5,000, failing which he would face contempt of court proceedings. In response, the activist has moved a second appeal with state chief information commissioner (CIC) against the district judge's decision. It all started with Hitesh Patel moving a complaint against all board members of Vallabh Vidyanagar Commercial Co-operative Bank alleging that the members had misappropriated a huge amount from the bank. After hearing the case, chief judicial magistrate J P Gadhvi dismissed the complaint on January 22 stating that there was not enough evidence to prove such allegations. Patel submitted an application to court's public information officer (PIO) seeking information on 'tod pani' (bribe) taken to dismiss the case. The principal senior civil judge, who is the PIO, wrote back to Patel on January 29 that "there is no evidence to support such claims" and told him that he can move to appellate authority — the chief district judicial magistrate or additional district magistrate. Patel then moved his first appeal with the chief district magistrate on January 31 stating that PIO's response was "against public interest". After receiving the appeal, Anand district court's registrar on February 12 asked Patel to submit Rs 50 along with his appeal. Instead of submitting Rs 50, Patel wrote back to the court registrar that "there are no provisions under RTI to charge such fees along with appeal". When the court registrar received Patel's letter, it was produced before principal district judge (appellate authority of court) M J Parikh, who imposed the fine on him. Patel, however, has moved a second appeal with CIC as well as court's PIO seeking information on "which grounds under RTI" was he asked to deposit Rs 5,000 as fine. Court fines RTI applicant-Ahmedabad-Cities-NEWS-The Times of India <!--google_ad_region_end=article--> |
![]() |
| Tags |
| court, rti, applicant |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Consumer forum fines private college | ganpat1956 | Chit Chat | 1 | 03-31-2008 11:26 AM |
| collection of fines in colleges | ragha | Ask for RTI Query | 1 | 01-10-2008 07:19 PM |
| Computerise all court records, CIC to Supreme Court | karira | RTI News & Discussion | 0 | 11-27-2007 07:44 PM |
| Bpl Rti Applicant: What Are The Advantages | Abhinav Bohare | Ask for RTI Query | 4 | 08-31-2007 05:53 PM |
| Info panel flexes muscles, fines top bureaucrats | ganpat1956 | RTI General Discussions | 7 | 07-15-2007 08:02 PM |
Copyrights | New to Site? | Need Help? |
|
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 Web Technologies by Dr. Kushal Pathak |