[linardni]

I have received the reply to my first RTI Application to WBPDCL (http://www.rtiindia.org/blogs/linard...plication-103/) scanned copy of the pages of which are attached in this post. However I am not satisfied with the catered information.
Under Point 2, the PIO mentioned ".........it was found that Shri Roy did not satisfy the requirements of qualification as mentioned in the Advertisement dated 6th June 2006. As per Advertisement specialization in Personnel Management / HR from the Institute of repute recognized by the AICTE would be the first specialization which was found absent in hi s case."
Since there was no specific mention of "first" specialization in the advertisement, what question may I include in my first appeal to compel the PIO to agree that there is a deviation from that mentioned in the advertisement, when judging the eligibility criteria of the candidates?
For my question 2, the annexure doesn't cover the information in full. For the First candidate, Institute is not mentioned. Furthermore, Major, Minor, Second Specialization issue is not mentioned. So far my knowledge goes any degree called MBA (HR) is not offered by the mentioned Universities. The degree is MBA only with specialization in one/two fields.
For my question 3, a quantitative reply was expected but no specific reply was given.
These are a few points which I've found to be queried through first appeal. Furthermore I request expert opinion to help me find out anymore queries which will compel the PIO to approve that the screening of candidates was done deviating from the eligibility criteria mentioned in the advertisement.