Dear Shri Gupta,
I think you have not interpreted the contents of your communication correctly. The commission has no where used the words "should not / shall not" in their communication, which alone can expressly prohibit the appearance of a lawyer. They have only communicated that "an authorised representative who may not be a practising lawyer. The main requirement here is a due authorisation to represent the complainant/petitioner and such an authorised person may or may not be a pracitsing lawyer.
__________________
Defeat is not final when you fall down. It is final when you refuse to get up. |