| Welcome to the RTI India: The complete Online Portal for Right to Information in India. Right to Information has an important economic dimension, as it embraces not only political freedom but also the freedom to lead a life with dignity, unfettered by domination and discrimination. Our aim is to provide authentic and analytical help regarding Right to Information in India to Officers, Lawyers, Citizens, RTI Activist, Associations, & NGO's. Our strength is in bringing them all at one platform. |
This is a discussion on RTI tiurns ACR's to APAR's within the RTI News & Discussion forums, part of the RTI News, Circulars and Decisions category; RTI turns ACRs into APARs After ACRs (Annual Confidential Reports), were ordered to be disclosed by the Gujarat Information Commission (GIC), under RTI , instead of the expected jubilation amongst ...
| New Thread |
| |||||||
104356 Webpages | Register | Tags | Meet Our Staff | Members List | Mark Forums Read |
| Notices |
|
#1
| |||||
| |||||
RTI turns ACRs into APARs After ACRs (Annual Confidential Reports), were ordered to be disclosed by the Gujarat Information Commission (GIC), under RTI, instead of the expected jubilation amongst ranks, most officers' preferred to wait, speculating on the government's reaction. The reaction was quite unexpected.The Centre's Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT), notified the 'All India Services (Performance Appraisal Report) Rules, 2007'. Thereby, ACRs are now APARs (Annual Performance Appraisal Report), and IAS, IPS, IFS officers, across the country would have full access to them. DoPT was earlier against disclosing ACRs. Their stand was supported by the Central Information Commission (CIC). DoPT's hand was forced by GIC's order.Government officers are after all nothing but public servants. While as citizens first, Babus find the door open to their right to know how they have been assessed, however it has its flip side too. Now the citizen too can learn how efficient these public servants are and who assessed them. Maybe Babus seeking their ACRs at GIC did not foresee this, but this possibility cannot be ignored. The wall of secrecy has now been brought down. Babus in Gujarat have unwittingly done a favour to their brethren across the country. Times of India, Ahmedabad 12.04.2007 Comments: This is real good decision in favour of citizens. Now we will know who works and who doesn't Last edited by karira; 04-15-2007 at 12:40 PM. |
|
#2
| |||||
| |||||
| ACR's are supposed to reflect how the person has performed over a period of time. but, i'm sure, it can be equally appreciated that an ACR may not be all that sacrosanct...after all, the one who is writting an ACR/Appraisal is a human being...an element of subjectivity would creep in.... |
|
#3
| |||||
| |||||
One of the IC's in CIC has ruled that ACR's are out of bounds as far as the RTI Act is concerned: Commission’s Decision: 3. In a number of decisions, this Commission has ordered that the proceedings of DPCs, except the inputs from ACRs, should be put in public domain so as to ensure transparency and objectivity in the selection process. As regards ACRs, it contains remarks made by the superior officers about assessed officials, the disclosure of which is not in public interest. Accordingly, the CPIO is directed to disclose the DPC’s proceedings after due application of section 10(1) of the Act so as to withhold the inputs based on ACRs. The disclosure of ACRs is however barred u/s 8 (1) (j) of the Act. Full decision can be viewed at: http://cic.gov.in/CIC-Orders/Decision_08062007_04.pdf |
|
#4
| |||||
| |||||
Quote:
http://persmin.nic.in/Acts_Rules/AIS/IAS_PAR.pdf Manoj |
|
#5
| |||||
| |||||
for the records, I am attaching it with the posts. It is only restricted to All India Service as of now which only include IAS, IPS and Indian Forest Service and that does not cover, Indian revenue Service, Indian Foreign Service, Indian Railway Services (The Central Services).
__________________ |
|
#6
| |||||
| |||||
Kushal, Just for my General Knowledge only, can you please let me know the following: (or any other officer can help with the answers): 1. Can a officer view his own ACR/APAR under normal rules ? How often is he allowed to do that ? Any charges to be paid by the officer for this ? Do superior officers "look down" upon juniors who want to see their own ACR's ? 2. What is the penalty/action on a superior officer for: Not submitting ACR's on time ? Not submitting ACR's at all ? Is it obligatory for a superior officer to complete ACR ? (I mean suppose he says he will not write the ACR at all) 3. What happens if the superior officer is transferred and a new person comes in, who does not have any clue about the performance of a subordinate ? Does the new officer write the ACR ? 4. Does the Government collect and publish any data about All India Service officers indicating how many ACR's submitted on time, how many pending, reasons for pending, action taken for not submitting ACR ? Number of ACR's which got "lost", etc. |
|
#7
| |||||
| |||||
Reference my above post, Kushal, I read the pdf file and some questions I raised are already answered. |
|
#8
| |||||
| |||||
RTI queries finally get govt cracking</ARTTITLE> 14 Jun, 2007 l 0221 hrs IST l Viju B/TIMES NEWS NETWORKMUMBAI: Persistent queries under the Right to Information Act on the pending Annual Confidential Report of IAS officers posted in Maharashtra have forced the government to act. Under Rule 5(1), 5(2) of the IAS Rules (Confidential Report), 1970, the ACRs have to be filed before July every year failing which it will be deemed as dereliction of duty on the part of the officers. The ACRs of IAS officers also assess the performance of bureaucrats for future promotions and transfers. An RTI query filed by activist Shailesh Gandhi last year revealed that more than 2,000 ACRs of IAS officers were pending across the country. In Maharashtra alone, the ACRs of 228 IAS officers were not received by the government while only 92 were completed last year. "The backlog was nearly 71% and was a sad reflection on the state bureaucracy," Gandhi said. After he got this response last November, he filed another query this year asking for the latest ACR figures. "Within a span of six months, the government has completed 210 ACRs. Also, only 30% of the backlog for last year remains," Gandhi said. Similarly, for 2005, the backlog has come down from 41.6% to 25% in six months. Earlier, Gandhi's RTI query and first appeal were rejected as the information sought was of a personal nature. Gandhi then went for a second appeal with the state information commission, which directed that the details be released. (TOI had reported the issue last year). "The postings were done on the basis of the recommendations of ministers, and ACRs were not even filed on time because it did not hold any value. But RTI has at least made the process to begin once more," an activist said. <!--google_ad_region_end=article--><SCRIPT type=text/javascript> var RN = new String (Math.random()); var RNS = RN.substring (2,11); var b2 = ' <iframe style="padding-left:8px;padding-top:8px;padding-bottom:8px;" name="fr1947" id="fr1947" src="http://ads.indiatimes.com/ads.dll/getad?slotid=1947" width="250" height="250" MARGINWIDTH="10" MARGINHEIGHT="0" HSPACE="0" VSPACE="0" FRAMEBORDER="0" SCROLLING="no" align="right" title="Advertisement" ALLOWTRANSPARENCY="true"> RTI queries finally get govt cracking-Mumbai-Cities-The Times of India |
|
#9
| |||||
| |||||
Kushal, The above news report answers some of my questions ! But, it also shows that all is not well with the appraisal system in the Government. |
|
#10
| |||||
| |||||
Quote:
Manoj |
|
#11
| |||||
| |||||
__________________ |
|
#12
| |||||
| |||||
ACR contents can be disclosed with safeguards: CIC New Delhi:: The Central Information Commission has ruled that information contained in the Annual Confidential Report (ACR) can be revealed with certain safeguards. Chief Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah held that though disclosure of ACRs is exempted under the provisions of RTI Act, information relating to categorisation in terms of Departmental Promotion Committee proceedings can be disclosed . Appellant Sharda Meshram had sought information about minutes of the DPC proceedings and categorisation of the ACRs from the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT) to protect her service prospects in the light of her having been superceded in seniority. The DoPT refused to provide the information on the grounds that contents of the ACR are exempted from disclosure. The panel held that as far as the proceedings of the DPCs were concerned, disclosure will bring in fairness and neutrality and will make the system more accountable. Regarding the ACRs, the panel held that though the disclosure of ACRs was exempted under section 8(2) of the RTI Act, the appellant in present case had only asked for information limited to categorisation in terms of DPC proceedings. The only conceivable exemption under the provisions could be the fiduciary relationship of the department with the members of the DPC or invasion of privacy of the persons whose names were considered by the DPC. IndianExpress.com :: ACR contents can be disclosed with safeguards: CIC |
|
#13
| |||||
| |||||
Please also see the following thread: Disclosures of Annual Confidential Reports (ACR) comes under Official Secret Act |
|
#14
| |||||
| |||||
Quote:
|
|
#15
| |||||
| |||||
Vshishthvivek, I tried : GIC - Gujarat Information Commission But most of the decisions are in Gujarati, which I cannot read. Can you please take help of someone speaking Gujarati and check decisions made before 12 Apr 2007 (since there is no search function on the website of GSIC) |
|
#16
| |||||
| |||||
Dear Karia. Thanks for the effort. I also don't know Gujrati. Since, I reside at Shimla, there is nobody around, who knows Gujrati. If, by chance, you found the decision, kindly also send me. Thanks again. |
|
#17
| |||||
| |||||
Quote:
Could you please provide the reference of trhe decision of CIC Gujrat about ACR..I am unable tofind the same.As I am not versed with Gujrati language I am unable to find it in English. Kindly favour me with the decision. adil85...................... Last edited by ganpat1956; 02-13-2008 at 10:13 PM. |