[linardni]

Sir, please note that the point upon which the whole matter pivots is very delicate. As per the recruitment advertisement, Human Resource Specialization was asked for. However when I passed the written examination and reported to appear for the Group Discussion round, I was debarred from sitting in the GD round telling that I'm screened out at this stage since I had second specialization in HR & not main specialization.
Now my point is, I was eliminated upon a criterion which was not specified in the advertisement. As per recruitment ad, candidates having HR as specialization may apply. Now my challenge is to frame such a query which will compel the PIO to reveal the fact that they have eliminated me upon a criterion which was not clearly specified in their advertisement.
Please refer the second scanned page (Point 5). The PIO has used two terms (technical jargons??) “prejudicially” and “stipulation”. I haven’t found the first word in the dictionary and stipulation should not be applicable in case of determination of eligibility of a candidate, isn’t it? The criteria should be very specific and must be adhered to.
Inviting opinion of expert forum members.