View Single Post

  #1  
Old 07-07-2009, 04:13 PM
darbar_madina's Avatar
darbar_madina darbar_madina is offline
Name: darbar
Just Popping In


 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: hyderabad
Posts: 27
darbar_madina is on a distinguished road
Thumbs up CPIO rejecting RTI applications even for sec(4) information


Hi all,

The CPIO of KIOCL Ltd(kudremukh iron ore company ltd), II block, koramangala, Bangalore - 560034 is rejecting every RTI application i send in which i sought information like employee names,designations & salary list which is to be proactively disclosed under sec (4) of RTI act.

The other RTI applications i filed are 1) information regarding attendance particulars of a section of employees.
2) pattern of leaves, number of leaves and authority who issue leaves.
3) property return forms submitted by some employees.
4) certified copy of CSS service conduct rules 1964 for that company.

But the CPIO rejected all the RTI applications stating that the information falls under purview of section 8(1)j and section 11 of the RTI act. He even sent back the Postal orders i have attached to RTI applications as fee.

I have even attached hard copies of CIC decisisons in support to the information i sought, but the CPIO bluntly rejected all the RTI applications.
I have filed one First appeal again with attaching the CIC decisions(which i downloaded from this site) but of no use , the appellate authority also rejected to provide information stating it is under section 11 of the RTI act.

Now please help, I need some volunteers who can jointly file RTI applications to teach or to bring awareness to this particular CPIO of KIOCL Ltd, II Block, Koramangala, Bangalore-560034, which is a central govt public authority under ministry of steel.

Will complaints to CIC work in this case if CPIO rejects to provide information intentionally.

Friends, plz help me in the RTI war.
Reply With Quote