| Welcome to the RTI India: The complete Online Portal for Right to Information in India. Right to Information has an important economic dimension, as it embraces not only political freedom but also the freedom to lead a life with dignity, unfettered by domination and discrimination. Our aim is to provide authentic and analytical help regarding Right to Information in India to Officers, Lawyers, Citizens, RTI Activist, Associations, & NGO's. Our strength is in bringing them all at one platform. |
This is a discussion on "Lot of water has flown under the bridge" - but still no penalty ! within the Appeals & decisions forums, part of the RTI News, Circulars and Decisions category; Applicant applied for information to CPIO, Oriental Insurance Company, on 20/11/2006 and even after 22 months and 3 hearings in the CIC , no penalty imposed on anyone, as yet. ...
| New Thread |
| |||||||
104356 Webpages | Register | Tags | Meet Our Staff | Members List | Mark Forums Read |
| Notices |
|
#1
| |||||
| |||||
Applicant applied for information to CPIO, Oriental Insurance Company, on 20/11/2006 and even after 22 months and 3 hearings in the CIC, no penalty imposed on anyone, as yet. IC Tiwari passes the matter back to the FAA and gives him another 3 weeks to fix responsibility: http://cic.gov.in/CIC-Orders/AT-21072008-05.pdf Event/Date Complainant filed his RTI-application before the CPIO, Shri V.K. Tanwar 20.11.2006 Complainant filed a complaint before the Commission 12.02.2007 Commission sought comments from Shri Tanwar 15.03.2007 Shri Tanwar’s comments received in the Commission 23.03.2007 Show-cause notice u/s 20(1) issued to Shri Tanwar 17.07.2007 Hearing held at the Commission (complaint proceeding) (Shri Tanwar was present) 29.08.2007 Commission ordered disclosure of information (Appeal part disposed of) 14.09.2007 Information supplied to the complainant by DGM, Regional Office-I, Jeevan Bharti Building, Connaught Circus 27.09.2007 Commission summoned Shri P.K.Jha, DGM and Shri Sunil Sonkar, D.M. (complaint proceedings) 22.10.2007 Page 2 of 2 Hearing held at the Commission (Shri P.K. Jha and Shri Sunil Sonkar were present) 19.12.2007 Commission sought written-submissions from the respondents 24.12.2007 Written submission of Shri P.K. Jha, dated 03.01.2008, received in the Commission 23.01.2008 Hearing held at the Commission (Shri P.K. Jha was present) 23.01.2008 Commission directed Shri P.K. Jha to file a chronology of the events connected with this RTI-petition 25.01.2008 Chronology of events as submitted by Shri P.K. Jha (dated 01.02.2008) received in the Commission 15.02.2008 Hearing held at the Commission (Shri P.K. Jha was present) 21.05.2008 And the order on 21st July 2008 is: In view of the fact that a lot of water has already flown under the bridge, the Commission, in order to clear this impasse, directs that the Appellate Authority, Shri S.K. Chanana, General Manager examine the matter and submit a report to the Commission within 3 weeks from the date of the receipt of this order, with a clear finding as to which officer was responsible for the delay and for how long. |
|
#2
| |||||
| |||||
One of ICs of CIC has some days back said that CIC is a toothless tigher. In fact CIC is making itself TOOTHLESS & POWERLESS, for the reasons best known to CIC. If a PSU DGM or CPIO does not take CIC seriously, U can think of IAS/IPS in central ministries.CIC urgently requires non.babu blood to act seriously and to mean business.
__________________ ACTIVE CITIZENS GET ACTIVE GOVTS |
| The Following User Says Thank You to jps50 For This Useful Post: | ||
vijendra singh (11-19-2008) | ||
|
#3
| |||||
| |||||
Penalty / punishment are being issued as per mood / will of the ICs. RTI rules / spirit are not being followed in information commissions as per RTI act 05. Thousands of appellants are sorry on the dismal performance of some ICs. Reasons are best known to the ICs only. After July 08 CIC started suddenly the no. of penalty cases. Why? Is it a seasonal process / Act ? These days many decisions of CIC are exactly as per RTI norms. Wish this practice not discontinue in future also. So Mr Karira should be happy now . |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
| ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Information that has to be "created" or "collected", cannot be denied under RTI.... | karira | RTI News & Discussion | 5 | 09-05-2008 01:06 PM |
| Change Conceptfrom "Why Give " To " Why Not Give " | colnrkurup | RTI General Discussions | 3 | 03-31-2008 01:39 PM |
| "Incompetence" new Ground to Escape RTI Penalty | sidmis | RTI News & Discussion | 2 | 02-09-2008 08:06 PM |
| AA rules that CPIO cannot give information since he was holding only an "additional charge" | karira | RTI General Discussions | 4 | 08-27-2007 05:33 PM |
| DoPT portal "misleads" President`s office on file notings | ganpat1956 | RTI News & Discussion | 0 | 03-28-2007 02:44 AM |
Copyrights | New to Site? | Need Help? |
|
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 Web Technologies by Dr. Kushal Pathak |