View Single Post

  #5  
Old 11-12-2007, 05:37 PM
karira's Avatar
karira karira is offline

 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Secunderabad
Posts: 4,742
Rep Power: 59
karira is an unknown quantity at this pointkarira is an unknown quantity at this pointkarira is an unknown quantity at this pointkarira is an unknown quantity at this pointkarira is an unknown quantity at this pointkarira is an unknown quantity at this pointkarira is an unknown quantity at this pointkarira is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Don’t accept RTI petitions, SIC tells Palakkad RDO

1. The RTI Act does not specify the "limit" for the number of applications one can file.
(Can the Court tell a citizen that he cannot file more than "X" number of cases in
a particular time period ?).
2. THE SIC has no powers under the RTI Act to issue such orders.
In fact the SIC is expected to see the implementation and observance of the
Act by the various PA's.
3. The Act is the RIGHT to Information Act.........one can easily go to court
against such a order by the SIC and file a writ for prevention of exercising his
RIGHT.
4. This is just a "escalation" of everyday problems that members of this forum and
other "citizens" face with PIO and AA. In this case the SIC itself has got involved.
5. If the RDO does not accept the RTI application from Major Ravindran, he should complain to the Kerala SIC and ask for imposition of Penalty under Section 20.
As discussed in some other thread, the imposition of penalty is "obligatory"

Colnrkurup has been continuously complaining against the Kerala SIC ever since he joined this forum. West Bengal seems to be another SIC which does not work properly.

Time to start reading Section 17 very carefully.....
Reply With Quote