View Single Post

  #4  
Old 12-19-2006, 02:27 PM
concerned's Avatar
concerned concerned is offline
Opening Up

 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 3
concerned is on a distinguished road

Many thanks for putting this where it belongs...actually each time I try to start new thread I can put in subject but the text body remained "grey" and would not let me type any text...I checked with my advocate yesterday and he told me this:

1) original right to information to check status of prior application letter and do investigation was sent to PIO as per the HP Government Pro-active Disclosure, who is the AC to Divisional Commissioner, Kangra District, along with some other RTIs.

2) In response the PIO/AC to Divisional Commissioner, Kangra District, wrote back to my advocate stating that in his capacity as AC to DC, he is ONLY PIO of revenue Dept whereas it is for my advocate to apply to the PIOs of each concerned department. And then all the RTIs sent were returned to my advocate.

3) DSP called my advocate to state "how can I act on an RTI which I have yet to receive?"...fair enough...

4) I got the original RTI, dated 13th November 2006, back from my advocate, and sent it to DSP/PIO of Security Branch this morning.

So, now let's see what happens.
Reply With Quote