User Tag List

Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 8 to 14 of 41
  1. #8
    Posts
    1,000
    Name:
    jetley
    Problems Posted
    0
    Problems Solved
    0
    Best Answers
    0
    Good Answers
    0

    Default Re: Penalty provision for First Appellate Authority in RTI Act,2005


    If the FAA does not decide the 1st appeal within prescribed time limit, or does not give a proper speaking order or gives an incomplete decision, he effectively refuses to perform his quasi-judicial duty to take sides with the PIO, and thereby renders himself deemed PIO. So by the same principles that make PIO liable for penal action, the deemed PIO (read AA in cases as mentioned above) may also become liable to pay compensation. This is purely my personal opinion.

    A few decisions, probably based on such premises, are attached herewith
    Disciplinary action if AA acts more like a senior officer discharging his administrative duties .pdfDisciplinary action, compensation from personal funds of AA AT-03042008-03.pdfAA compensation show cause 4 failure 2 dispose 1st appeal Decision_15102007_26.pdf


    Likes 3 Member(s) liked this post
     

  2. #9
    Posts
    1,000
    Name:
    jetley
    Problems Posted
    0
    Problems Solved
    0
    Best Answers
    0
    Good Answers
    0

    Default Re: Penalty provision for First Appellate Authority in RTI Act,2005


    Please also see point 39 (ii) of the attached DoPT OM, indicating FAA can himself give information

    Guidelines for FAA 1_3_2008_IR(Eng).pdf
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post
     

  3. #10
    Posts
    1,119
    Name:
    Dr.V.S.Prasanna Rajan
    Blog Entries
    1
    Problems Posted
    0
    Problems Solved
    0
    Best Answers
    0
    Good Answers
    0

    Default Re: Penalty provision for First Appellate Authority in RTI Act,2005


    The following points are to be noted:
    1. The CPIO, and the appellate authority belong to the same public authority.
    2. Even though the CPIO's decision is defective, the appellate authority has inherent powers under RTI act, 2005, to decide INDEPENDENTLY and moreover, he also can provide the information himself.
    3. Hence, the decision of the appellate authority in an RTI application has a crucial bearing on the deficiency / otherwise of the service of the public authority.
    4. Hence, both the CPIO, appellate authority shares responsibility for the quality of service, if interpreted in terms of the CPA, 1986.
    I hope, this clarifies.
    vsprajan.
    Likes 2 Member(s) liked this post
     

  4. #11
    Posts
    43,467
    Name:
    C J Karira
    Blog Entries
    9
    Problems Posted
    0
    Problems Solved
    20
    Best Answers
    16
    Good Answers
    46

    Default Re: Penalty provision for First Appellate Authority in RTI Act,2005



    The FAA is a quasi judicial authority.

    That DoPT circular is not 100% correct. It has those contents in order to facilitate the quick disclosure of information at the first appeal stage. Information can only be supplied by the PIO and under his own signature.

    If FAA supplied you information, then how will you invoke Sec 19(5) ? OR prove the later part of Sec 20(1) and 20(2) to demand penalty on the PIO ?

    Carrying the argument a bit further, you pay some fees to the High Court or Supreme Court for filing your case, etc. Can you also haul them up for deficiency of service ?

    The prescribed fees you pay for first appeals in some States is for the quasi judicial functions performed by the FAA under Sec 19(1) and not for providing you any service !
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post
     
    Twitter: @cjkarira

  5. #12
    Posts
    464
    Name:
    NK Agarwal
    Blog Entries
    21
    Problems Posted
    0
    Problems Solved
    0
    Best Answers
    0
    Good Answers
    0

    Default Re: Penalty provision for First Appellate Authority in RTI Act,2005


    I think DOPT obliges different Departments/Ministry by issuing multiple and/or conflicting OMs whenever a Department approaches it for relief for their misfeasance and malfeasance and to protect them from any judicial scrutiny. In umpteen nos. of cases it has been observed that whenever any issue of misdeeds comes under judicial review the Departments takes a stand under these multiple and conflicting OMs of DOPT. Otherwise how come DOPT has issued such a OM that protects a CPIO from penalty and FAA from imposition of departmental proceedings for not performing the Quasi-judicial duties and go scot free. It would be interesting to obtain certified copies of the whole decision making process inclusive of file notings and attendant documents of such OMs from DOPT. thnks.
    Likes 2 Member(s) liked this post
     

  6. #13
    Posts
    1,119
    Name:
    Dr.V.S.Prasanna Rajan
    Blog Entries
    1
    Problems Posted
    0
    Problems Solved
    0
    Best Answers
    0
    Good Answers
    0

    Default Re: Penalty provision for First Appellate Authority in RTI Act,2005


    The following important points are to be noted:

    1. THE PENALTY IS LEVIED BASICALLY FOR DEFICIENCY IN ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE AS MANDATED BY THE STATUTES.

    2. The PIO performs administrative task in providing / denying information under applicable sections of rti act,BY WRITTEN COMMUNICATION.

    2. Hence, inaction / lack of communication by PIO to the applicant in spite of the mandate of providing time bound reply by the pio by the rti act, makes him liable for penalty.

    3. However, the FAA performs a quasi judicial function. In case of inaction by the pio, he can direct the pio to either provide the information, or if exempted info is requested, he can direct the pio to justify the same under relevant reasons.


    4. THE DECISION BY A QUASI JUDICIAL FUNCTIONARY CANNOT BE CONSTRUED AS DEFICIENCY IN SERVICE, AS VIEWED BY THE SUPREME COURT IN S.P. Goel v. Collector of Stamps, Delhi .

    5. The Supreme Court, while holding that the authorities under the Registration Act and Stamp Act perform statutory duties which are at least quasi judicial and their acts cannot amount to under the Consumer Protection Act, held in paragraphs 31 to 33 as follows:

    31. Running through the twin Acts, namely, the Registration Act and the Stamp Act, we could not, at any stage, reconcile ourselves to the idea spoused by the appellant's counsel, that there is an element of commercialism involved in the whole process of registration of instruments or payment of Stamp Duty and that the executant of an instrument at the time of its presentation for registration becomes a "consumer" entitled to "service" within the ambit of Consumer Protection Act. The reasons are many.

    32. The Registration Act as also the Stamp Act are meant primarily to augment the State revenue by prescribing the stamp duty on various categories of instruments or documents and the procedure for collection of stamp duty through distress or other means including criminal prosecution as non-payment of stamp duty has been constituted as an offence. Payment of registration fee or registration charges including charges for issuing certified copies of the registered documents or fee for the inspection of various registers or documents
    kept in the Registrars or Sub-Registrars office etc. constitute another component of State revenue.

    33. In this situation, therefore, the person who presents a document for registration and pays the stamp duty on it or the registration fee does not become a consumer nor do the officers appointed to implement the provisions of the two Acts render any service within the meaning of Consumer Protection Act. They only perform their statutory duties (some of which, as earlier indicated, are judicial or at least quasi-judicial in nature) to raise and collect the State revenue which is a part of the sovereign power of the State.

    6. If the applicant is indeed aggrieved by the decision of the FAA, provision for further appeal to the Commission already exists in the act.

    7. Hence collectively based on all the facts stated above, it can be reasonably construed that there is no provision for penalty for FAA for his faulty decision. HOWEVER, THE FAA IS LIABLE UNDER DEPARTMENTAL RULES FOR HIS INACTION IN HIS REPLY TO THE APPLICATION WITHIN THE TIME MANDATED BY THE RTI ACT.

    8. EVEN UNDER THE CPA, THE PENALTY CAN ONLY BE IMPOSED ON THE PIO, AND EVEN IF PENALTY IS IMPOSED ON THE PUBLIC AUTHORITY, IT CAN AT MOST BE RECOVERED ONLY FROM THE PIO AND NOT FROM THE FAA SOLELY BASED ON THE DECISIONS BY THE FAA.


    I hope this clarifies.

    vsprajan
    Likes 2 Member(s) liked this post
     

  7. #14
    Posts
    14,770
    Name:
    J.P. SHAH
    Blog Entries
    80
    Problems Posted
    0
    Problems Solved
    32
    Best Answers
    4
    Good Answers
    33

    Default Re: Penalty provision for First Appellate Authority in RTI Act,2005


    FAA can be punished if IC recommends or if Head of public authority initiates departmental action for not complying with provisions of law [in this case RTI Act] passed by parliament which every public servant is bound to comply.

    In case of consumer complaint for RTI, the penalty for deficiency in service will be on public authority and not personally on PIO or FAA etc. Public authority may take departmental action against these officers for deficiency in service and impose penalty under service rules. Under Consumer Protection Act, the service providing entity is held liable and not its officers or employees.

    Following decisions of CIC will also be relevant in the matter of FAA:


    No. CIC/SG/A/2010/001352/8407 dated 05-07-2010
    No.CIC/SG/A/2010/000085/6895Adjunct dated 05-07-2010
    No. CIC/AT/A/2008/00290 dated 17-07-2008
    No.CIC/AD/A/2010/000952 dated August 18, 2010
    No. CIC/AT/A/2010/000451 dated, the 18-11- 2010 [SBI]
    No. CIC/DS/A/2011/000220 dated 12-05-2011

    AND office memorandum No. 10/23/2007-IR dated 09-07-2007 of DoPT, Govt of India, New Delhi.
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post
     
    It takes each of us to make difference for all of us.

Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast


About RTI INDIA

    RTI INDIA: Invoking Your Rights. We provide easy ways to request, analyze & share Government documents by use of Right to Information and by way of community support.

Follow us on

Twitter Facebook youtube Tumblr RTI Microblog RSS Feed Apple App Store Google Play for Android

Newsletter Subscription