| Welcome to the RTI India: The complete Online Portal for Right to Information in India. Right to Information has an important economic dimension, as it embraces not only political freedom but also the freedom to lead a life with dignity, unfettered by domination and discrimination. Our aim is to provide authentic and analytical help regarding Right to Information in India to Officers, Lawyers, Citizens, RTI Activist, Associations, & NGO's. Our strength is in bringing them all at one platform. |
This is a discussion on High Court stays fine imposed on varsity official within the RTI News & Discussion forums, part of the RTI News, Circulars and Decisions category; As reported by Special Correspondent in thehindu.com on 27 September 2008: The Hindu : Kerala / Kozhikode News : High Court stays fine imposed on varsity official High Court stays ...
| New Thread |
| |||||||
104356 Webpages | Register | Tags | Meet Our Staff | Members List | Mark Forums Read |
| Notices |
|
#1
| |||||
| |||||
As reported by Special Correspondent in thehindu.com on 27 September 2008: The Hindu : Kerala / Kozhikode News : High Court stays fine imposed on varsity official High Court stays fine imposed on varsity official Kozhikode: The High Court has stayed the fine imposed on an official of Calicut University by the State Information Commission for the delay in furnishing information under the Right to Information Act. State Information Commissioner P.N. Vijayakumar had in August found Public Information Officer K.P. Sasikumar, Deputy Registrar of the Planning and Development Wing, guilty under Section 20 (1) (delay in furnishing information) of the Right to Information (RTI) Act. According to the order issued by the Commissioner, he had to remit a penalty of Rs.21,250 within 30 days of the receipt of the order, failing which the amount should be recovered from his salary of the ensuing month or should be recovered by attachment and sale of his movable or immovable properties. Time factor As per the RTI Act, the time period to get information is 30 days from the date of application and 48 hours for information concerning the life and liberty of a person. Failure to provide information within the specified time is deemed refusal. In this case, there was a delay of 88 days. After deducting the days for receipt and despatch of information the delay was calculated to 85 days. The applicant was the Vypeen-based Sree Ayyankali Cultural Council State general secretary P.K. Bahuleyan, who had sought information on several issues including those relating to the Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe. ‘No wilful negligence’ Mr. Sasikumar had in his reply admitted the delay but also stated that there was no wilful negligence on his part for not furnishing the information within the stipulated time. |
![]() |
| Tags |
| high court, penalty |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Question: for obtaining information high court of karnataka insists deposit of fee in cash only at high court at banglore not acepts postal orders | jabbar | Ask for RTI Query | 2 | 09-04-2008 07:56 AM |
| Need Help: Whether RTI can be utilised in High Court and lower court in asking certified copies from a distance | TSBehera | Ask for RTI Query | 0 | 04-20-2008 10:27 PM |
| Ball in the high court | ganpat1956 | RTI News & Discussion | 1 | 02-10-2008 01:35 PM |
| RTI fine slapped on health official | ganpat1956 | RTI News & Discussion | 0 | 08-10-2007 05:43 AM |
| Highest fine under RTI Act imposed in Punjab | ganpat1956 | RTI News & Discussion | 0 | 02-18-2007 12:13 AM |
Copyrights | New to Site? | Need Help? |
|
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 Web Technologies by Dr. Kushal Pathak |