| Welcome to the RTI India: The complete Online Portal for Right to Information in India. Right to Information has an important economic dimension, as it embraces not only political freedom but also the freedom to lead a life with dignity, unfettered by domination and discrimination. Our aim is to provide authentic and analytical help regarding Right to Information in India to Officers, Lawyers, Citizens, RTI Activist, Associations, & NGO's. Our strength is in bringing them all at one platform. |
This is a discussion on RTI Act, 2005 Section 7: Disposal of request within the Ask for RTI Query forums, part of the RTI Community Support category; Someone filed an application for certain information under RTI Act 2005, which runs into thousands of pages. The "Public Authority" agrees to give him the hard copies of the information ...
| New Thread |
| |||||||
104356 Webpages | Register | Tags | Meet Our Staff | Members List | Mark Forums Read |
| Notices |
|
#1
| |||||
| |||||
Someone filed an application for certain information under RTI Act 2005, which runs into thousands of pages. The "Public Authority" agrees to give him the hard copies of the information and requests him to deposit the fee (about Rs 45,000.00) representing the cost of providing information as per rates fixed under rules by the State Government. The request was sent to the applicant well within 30 days, through a registered letter, which came back undelivered with the remark "addressee not found or refused to receive the letter". Another effort was made to ensure delivery of the letter by sending it again to the applicant but with same results. Nothing has been heard from the applicant since (more than sixty days!). How do the PIO proceed in the matter? How long shall he wait for the applicant to resurface and keep the application live in his register and returns? |
|
#2
| |||||
| |||||
Two attempts are good enough. Ask the PIO to retain the two undelivered letters with envelope as proof of returned letters. In case the applicant has provided any phone/mobile/fax no. or e-mail address, contact him there. Otherwise stop pursuing the matter. |
|
#3
| |||||
| |||||
Two returned envelopes is proof enough (in fact, even one was enough). Just wait till he comes for First Appeal or Complains to the SIC/CIC and show him the envelopes. If the applicant did not ask for any specific means/mode of communication, the PIO is correct in using ordinary post. |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Question: RTI act, 2005 section(8)(1)(b) | realfren007 | Ask for RTI Query | 5 | 10-07-2008 09:52 PM |
| Advice on section 7 (8) & 7 (9) of RTI ct-2005 | rkgarg2000 | Ask for RTI Query | 10 | 10-07-2008 05:04 PM |
| Section 8 of RTI Act 2005 | rishraM | RTI General Discussions | 14 | 08-16-2008 12:42 AM |
| If some institute not follows the Section 4(1) (b) of the RTI Act 2005 | vedvrat_s | Ask for RTI Query | 5 | 02-18-2008 01:24 PM |
| Proactive disclosure under section 4 of RTI Act 2005 | sngupta | Ask for RTI Query | 40 | 01-19-2008 05:39 PM |
Copyrights | New to Site? | Need Help? |
|
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 Forum Answers by - Gio~Logist - Vbulletin Solutions & Services
Web Technologies by Dr. Kushal Pathak |