New File Added: TRAI asked to get call/sms details
This is a discussion on New File Added: TRAI asked to get call/sms details within the Appeals & decisions forums, part of the RTI News, Circulars and Decisions category; Downloads: A new file has been added by karira: TRAI asked to get call/sms details CIC has ordered TRAI to get call and sms details form private service provider and ...
- 01-08-2012, 10:40 AM #1
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Secunderabad
- Posts
- 38,102
- Name:
- C J Karira
- Blog Entries
- 3
New File Added: TRAI asked to get call/sms details
Downloads: A new file has been added by karira:
TRAI asked to get call/sms details
CIC has ordered TRAI to get call and sms details form private service provider and provide to applicant.
-
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to karira For This Useful Post:
umapathi.s (02-05-2013), vsprajan (02-05-2013)
-
Re: New File Added: TRAI asked to get call/sms details
does it mean that now onwards any Indian with justified motive may ask subject information from TRAI. and in this preview what is justified motive. I request karia sir to please clarify.Sponsorer
- 01-08-2012, 08:06 PM #3
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Secunderabad
- Posts
- 38,102
- Name:
- C J Karira
- Blog Entries
- 3
Re: New File Added: TRAI asked to get call/sms details
The order does not say anything about "justification" or "motive". It also does not say anything about whether those numbers belonged to the applicant or to someone else.
- 01-09-2012, 01:25 AM #4
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Location
- JUNAGADH GUJ
- Posts
- 11,909
- Name:
- J.P. SHAH
- Blog Entries
- 73
Re: New File Added: TRAI asked to get call/sms details
WE GET GOVT WE DESERVE. WHAT DO YOU PLAN FOR 2013?
- 02-05-2013, 01:49 PM #5
Quite a regular
- Join Date
- Nov 2011
- Location
- Gandhinagar
- Posts
- 126
- Blog Entries
- 1
Re: New File Added: TRAI asked to get call/sms details
In para 3 of the order " 3. Vide letter dated 15th July 2011, the CPIO had refused to
disclose any information to the appellant on the ground that he was seeking third
party information. The first appeal was dismissed by the AA vide order dated 1st
September, 2011."
We can assume that Numbers are not belongs to the applicant
-
The Following User Says Thank You to upendra upadhyay For This Useful Post:
karira (02-05-2013)
-
RTI INDIA




1Recommended
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote



Bookmarks