Page 1 of 12 1234511 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 5 of 58
Recommendation Tree11Recommended

Maharashtra quietly amends its RTI Rules

This is a discussion on Maharashtra quietly amends its RTI Rules within the RTI News & Discussion forums, part of the RTI News, Circulars and Decisions category; On 16 Jan 2012 and 30 Jan 2012, Maharashtra quietly amended the RTI Rules. 1. RTI application only 150 words 2. RTI application on one single subject matter 3. During ...

          


  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Secunderabad
    Posts
    37,711
    Name:
    C J Karira
    Blog Entries
    3

    Maharashtra quietly amends its RTI Rules

    On 16 Jan 2012 and 30 Jan 2012, Maharashtra quietly amended the RTI Rules.

    1. RTI application only 150 words
    2. RTI application on one single subject matter
    3. During "inspection", applicant only allowed to carry pencil

    The Gazette notifications are attached to this post.



    Attached Files Attached Files

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Nashik
    Posts
    3,392
    Name:
    Atul Patankar
    Blog Entries
    3

    Breaking news : Rti maharashtra rules amended in jan 2012!

    Sponsorer
    Copied from email received from Krishnaraj Rao, a leading activist from Mumbai

    30 March 2012, Mumbai: There has been a startling breach of trust and public confidence by Govt of Maharashtra. Without any public debate, the government has quietly notified an amendment to Maharashtra RTI Rules on 16th January 2012. See Notified Maharashtra RTI Rules Amendment Jan 2012.pdf - File Shared from Box - Free Online File Storage

    Shockingly, we did not even learn this from any government source such as a public notice in the dailies. Nor was it told to any RTI activist – many of whom are in regular touch with Mantralaya. We were informed by our RTI Union member Advocate Vinod Sampat, who saw this notification in the March edition of a publication he purchased outside City Civil Court. After reading it, we are left no doubt as to the authenticity of the notification and the amendment.

    THE AMENDMENT SAYS:

    (i) Request for information must nor ordinarily exceed 150 words

    (ii) Request for information must relate to one subject matter only. If necessary, separate applications must be made if it relates to more than one.

    (iii) Public Information Officer (PIO) must allow the person inspecting the documents to take a pencil only. All other writing instruments must be deposited with the PIO.



    Attached Files Attached Files

  3. #3
    dssampath is offline Quite a regular
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Madurai
    Posts
    74
    Name:
    S.Sampath

    Re: Maharashtra quietly amends its RTI Rules

    This is a very bad one. This will spread over to other states. Before that we have to take some steps to stay the said notification.




  4. #4
    namitabh is offline Quite a regular
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    MUMBAI
    Posts
    77
    Name:
    Namitabh

    Re: Maharashtra quietly amends its RTI Rules

    MAHARASHTRA KILLS RTI ACT - sum and substance of the amendment and final result...



    --
    Regards,
    NK
    "Indifference & Corruption, India's 2 most threatening malady"

    "The Suppression of Documents deprives the Indian Public of Information it needs in order to Evaluate the Wisdom of Government Policy, to Hold Officials Accountable for their Decisions and to Ensure that the Mistakes and Abuses of the Past are Not Repeated in the Future."

    प्रत्येक लोकशाहि राष्ट्रात विधिमंडळ महत्त्वाची कामगिरी बजावित असते.आपण स्विकारलेल्या संसदीय लोकशाही शासन पद्धतीमध्ये भारतीय संविधानातील तरतुदींनुसार विधिमंडळाचे काम म्हणजे सरकार बनविणे, सरकारला योग्य प्रकारे वागायला लावणे व प्रसंगी सरकार बदलणे, सरकारी कामकाजावर देखरेख ठेवणे, सरकारी कारभारात गैरप्रकार आढळ्ल्यास त्याबद्दल जाब विचारणे इत्यादी विधिमंडळाची कामे आहेत.


  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    india
    Posts
    841
    Name:
    aslam

    Re: Maharashtra quietly amends its RTI Rules

    Maharashtra is the only state in India. where citizen are paying taxes much higher then any other state of the country. & tax collection is also higher but look at this what citizen gets in return back stabbing by the government of Maharashtra.

    can we ask U/S 4(1)(d) of the RTI Act 2005 to the Governor of Maharashtra about this decision?




 

 

  • RTI INDIA

    advertising

      
     

Page 1 of 12 1234511 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO