| Welcome to the RTI India: The complete Online Portal for Right to Information in India. Right to Information has an important economic dimension, as it embraces not only political freedom but also the freedom to lead a life with dignity, unfettered by domination and discrimination. Our aim is to provide authentic and analytical help regarding Right to Information in India to Officers, Lawyers, Citizens, RTI Activist, Associations, & NGO's. Our strength is in bringing them all at one platform. |
This is a discussion on For Indian citizens in the USA....How to use RTI ? within the RTI General Discussions forums, part of the RTI Community Lounge category; Welcome to A.I.D's Right to Information Page RTI info Dear AIDers/ NRIs, Good news from the AID Anti-Corruption Team. Due to sustained efforts by ACT volunteers, Indian Embassy in Washington ...
| New Thread |
| |||||||
89396 Webpages | Register | Tags | Members List | Mark Forums Read |
| Notices |
|
#1
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
Welcome to A.I.D's Right to Information Page
Save RTI Campaign - Home | ||||||||
|
#2
| |||||
| |||||
NRI's in US allowed RTI access NEW DELHI: Now non-resident Indians (NRIs) living in the US would now be able to exercise the Right to Information (RTI). The Indian embassy in Washington DC has been brought under the purview of the RTI Act, 2005 and a public information officer (PIO) has been appointed. This does not mean that the embassy's functions alone would be under the RTI Act purview. If NRIs need any information on Government departments in India, they would be able to file an RTI in the embassy, which in turn would send it to the department in India. The information would be given within 35 days of filing of the application. NRIs have already started exercising their right. 10 applications have been filed with the embassy. One of the first applications is regarding Bhopal Gas Tragedy. Somu Kumar, a resident of Virginia, has filed an application requesting information on Dow Chemicals, headquartered in US. Somu expects to hold Dow Chemicals "accountable" in some through this information. Any Indian citizen with a valid Indian passport can do what Somu has done by just paying a nominal fee of 24 cents. Somu says: "Filing an RTI application is easier than the leave of absence applications one wrote in the primary school." This success did not come easily. RTI activists from India and America had to campaign for months to bring the Indian embassy under the purview RTI Act. When the repeated appeals to the Indian embassy went unheard, the activists got in touch with Central Information Commission (CIC) in India. Chief Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah issued an order in April bringing all foreign missions under RTI Act. It is only now that the Act is being implemented in America. Washington DC is the first embassy to have declared its PIO and appellate authority also. Rahul Chhabra, counsellor (Press, Information and Culture), at the embassy is the PIO and RS Jassal, deputy chief of mission, is the appellate authority to file the first appeals. Says Arun Gopalan, a resident of Maryland: "Our repeated attempts since November 2006 to get the Indian embassy officials in Washington DC to implement the RTI Act went unheard and then we were left with no other option but to get in touch with the Central Information Commission directly." PunjabNewsline.com - NRI's in US allowed RTI excess |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
This is definitely a great step forward. In terms of payment, the govt. should formulate separate rules for information obtained through Indian missions worldwide. For example in the US, $0.24 is a ridiculous low fee - needs to be at least $1.00 - even a usual piece of postal mail needs $0.43 as postage. This won't be any different from pricing services like passports through Indian missions at a little different rates in respective countries. |
|
#4
| |||||
| |||||
compuser1973, I think by "separate rules" you are basically referring to the Fees charged under RTI 2005. If that is correct, then your suggestion will not only be unfair but will also be against the basic principle of "Equality" enshrined in our constitution. Indian Citizens cannot be discriminated on the basis of their "location". The Fees are same everywhere. The only exception is for Below Poverty Line (BPL) applicants, which you will agree, is very fair. Passport Services and Miscellaneous Services available to Indian Citizens at High Commissions, Embassies & Consulates, cost the same. If a Indian Citizen applies for a "new booklet", whether in London, Washington DC or Santa Cruz de Tenerife (Canary Islands), the charges are same. The differences (sometimes minor and sometimes major) occur due to exchange rate fluctuations (which are very common these days) and due to Indian Diplomats not changing the "Fees structure" frequently, as per exchange rate fluctuations, due to administrative and procedural reasons (everything needs clearance from New Delhi). If you read the Indian Press , you would have noticed that the US Embassy issues press statements changing the Visa Fees once in a few months because of Exchange rate fluctuations. It is a different matter that they have not reduced the Visa Fees (in Indian Rupees, because the fees in US Dollars is constant), when the Indian Rupee has strengthened from 45 to 40.......but then, they are not covered under RTI Act 2005 (LOL). Practically, I completely agree with you that the US$ 0.24 is ridiculously low, but a rule is a rule. You might also be interested in reading the following threads: http://www.rtiindia.org/forum/ask-rt...about-rti.html http://www.rtiindia.org/forum/ask-rt....html#post3599 |
|
#5
| |||||
| |||||
Further to my above post, I want to clarify that, when I refer to "Fees" , that means Application Fee. In case of other charges for providing information (like Photocopies, inspection of files, etc.), even within India, each State is allowed to have separate rules. Sometimes, I have observed that some Public Authorities in the same State have different charges. Under this category, the MEA, as a Public Authority, is well within its rights, to specify "different" charges in different countries, depending on local conditions, economic costs, etc. (I am sorry, I had to make a separate post, because I thought of this clarification after the mandatory 5 minutes had passed, as required under forum rules, for editing one's post) Last edited by karira; 07-10-2007 at 10:14 AM. |
|
#6
| ||||
| ||||
karira, Not quite - passport office page mentions a new passport fee to be Rs. 1000/- (Fee Structure) while fee in the US is $40 and GBP 25 in UK - nowhere near the conversion rate in years even accounting for fluctuation. I believe the difference is to account for regional cost variations in providing a service - and rightly so. Similar can be the logic for RTI application as well in my view..... |
|
#7
| |||||
| |||||
compuser1973, Yes, quite. This explanation is long. Although from your posts, I can make out that you will understand a very short explanation, since this is a public forum, many members or guests, who are not very familiar with the subject, might find a longer explanation interesting and easy to understand. Let's come back to charges within India at the end of the post. PREAMBLE: 1. I had decided not to post for some time on the forum and only visit as a "guest" without logging in. But after I saw your post, I decided to log in and reply. I will go back into "hibernation" mode after this and in case you have any queries, you can email me on /myusername/ as on this forum, at eth dot net (good way to beat bots and spiders). 2. I have never been an "Officer" nor any one in my family has ever been one. 3. When I replied to your earlier post, I did not do any research, but directly replied, since I was absolutely sure about what I was saying. 4. I am no PIO of any PA, as defined in RTI 2005, so I cannot be penalised for any "incorrect" or "misleading" information. However, while helping or guiding anyone, if I give wrong information, I will feel very guilty and that will be more than enough "penalty" for me ! (He He He) 5. For this, I did 50 minutes of research and typing, but when I hit the "submit reply" button, I was asked to log in again and lost the draft. I have done that twice, so this third time, this is on notepad and while copying and pasting, the formatting might be slightly skewed, so please excuse. FACTS/DATA/SOURCES: 1. The historical currency exchange rates are from: FXHistory - Historical Currency Exchange Rates 2. The charges for passport services are directly form webistes of : USA: Embassy of India - Washington DC UK: Fee for PIO Card, Passport, Visa and Consular services, High Commission of India in London, Indian High Commission in United Kingdom Australia: Consulate General of India, Sydney Japan: INDIA (We call ourselves IT & Computer experts , but look, we can't even have a common normenclature for websites of our missions abroad. Anyone in MEA listening ? And, for the love of my life, I cannot understand, why the Indian Consulate website in Sydney has a picture of the Sydney Opera House on it !) 3. The last time, the Charges were changed, was 1st April 2002 (Yes Sir, 5 years ago !). This was from a website, which I cannot just seem to find again. It's with a red colour background, with white and yellow letters. Sorry, but for this information I cannot give you the link. But believe me the date is correct. BASIS: 1. For simplicity, only 2 "services" have been used for comaprison: Ordinary Passport Jumbo Passport 2. Only USA, UK, Australia and Japan have been used for comparison: - Africa does not interest many people - Latam and SE Asia have had too many currency upheavals - East Europe/USSR have changed drastically and broken up - European Currencies do not exist with the introduction of Euro. 3. Since the last time the charges were revised, was on 1st April 2002, the exchange rates used are those prevailing between 1st March and 1st April 2002. This is not a very correct thing to do in the Indian scenario. Because I know of one instance very long long time ago, when the decision to revise charges was implemented 2.5 years after it was taken. For the purpose of this discussion, let's assume that the prevailing exchange rate during March 2002 was the basis. 4. All foreign currencies are converted back to Indian Rupee (INR) instead of direct conversion from GBP to US$ or AUS$ to JY, because our Foreign Office Mandarins sit in South Block in New Delhi (or the old Akbar Hotel in Chanakyapuri) and everything is always converted back to INR. EXPLANATION/PROOF: The charges for the two services in the 4 countries, in local currency are; ORDINARY JUMBO USA US$ 40 US$ 50 UK GBP 27 GBP 34 Australia AUS$ 78 No info on website Japan Y 5600 Y 7200 During March 2002, the exchange rates of various currencies against INR were: US$ 50 GBP 70 Aus$ 21 Jap. Yen 0.38 I just took the "most frequent" appearing number on the table and omitted the decimals. Now, if you multiply and see, the charges for the Ordinary will be about Rs 2000 and for the Jumbo will be Rs 2500. If there is a difference of a few hundred rupees here and there, its only because of the above "short cuts" I have used. Therefore, charges for Indian Citizens, using Passport services in ANY country in the world are uniform. compuser1973, our Indian "Officers" are very very diligent and carefully calculate even the last paise, when it comes to either taking money from the citizens or giving refund (which they do not give very easily !) CHARGES BACK IN INDIA: Although I know the explanation, I will not reveal. I think you have never used RTI before. Is that correct ? If yes, why don't you use this oppurtunity to use RTI for the first time and find out why the charges are different in India. You can send an application to PIO of MEA or to the local PIO in the Indian Embassy (in case you stay abroad). It will be a good experience and then you can guide others also in using RTI with that experience. Please share the outcome with the forum members and guests. I will keep reading. If the reply you get, is "incorrect" or "misleading", I will inform you, and then, you can also experience First Appeal, which can be made under section 18, 1 e. Now, back to work. Karira |
![]() |
| Tags |
| right to information, embassy |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Hi to all the like minded citizens of India. | crazysaint9 | New Member Introduction | 2 | 10-01-2008 09:02 PM |
| On PMC terrain, one urinal for 9,000 citizens | karira | RTI News & Discussion | 0 | 12-12-2007 04:03 PM |
| RTI awards for citizens, officials | sidmis | RTI News & Discussion | 0 | 10-18-2007 06:52 AM |
| Any news on priority given to senior citizens by CIC | Debashis Basu | RTI News & Discussion | 2 | 09-11-2007 03:31 PM |
| Citizens' Infobahn | ganpat1956 | RTI General Discussions | 0 | 08-26-2007 08:41 AM |
Copyrights | New to Site? | Need Help? |
|
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 Web Technologies by Dr. Kushal Pathak |