| Welcome to the RTI India: The complete Online Portal for Right to Information in India. Right to Information has an important economic dimension, as it embraces not only political freedom but also the freedom to lead a life with dignity, unfettered by domination and discrimination. Our aim is to provide authentic and analytical help regarding Right to Information in India to Officers, Lawyers, Citizens, RTI Activist, Associations, & NGO's. Our strength is in bringing them all at one platform. |
This is a discussion on RTI reply not signed as PIO/CPIO/FAA! within the Ask for RTI Query forums, part of the RTI Community Support category; A Central PA seem to be RTI -illiterate. Whenever a RTI query is sent to their PIO , it is replied by their Branch Head clearly having their official seal ...
| New Thread |
| |||||||
104356 Webpages | Register | Tags | Meet Our Staff | Members List | Mark Forums Read |
| Notices |
|
#1
| |||||
| |||||
A Central PA seem to be RTI-illiterate. Whenever a RTI query is sent to their PIO, it is replied by their Branch Head clearly having their official seal and designation. and if a RTI appeal is sent, their reply comes with their Regional Head's signature and official designation/seal. Are all those replies valid? which dont show the deptt respective PIO/CPIO/FAA posts and seals. Though, who have signed, might be the PA's PIO/CPIO/FAA Is it not mandatory to use PIO/CPIO/FAA designations in RTI correspondence? |
|
|
The RTI query must be answered by the PIO to whom the application was sent. Sec 7(1) states Subject to the proviso to sub-section (2) of section 5 or the proviso to sub-section (3) of section 6, the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, on receipt of a request under section 6 shall, as expeditiously as possible, and in any case within thirty days of the receipt of the request, either provide the information on payment of such fee as may be prescribed or reject the request for any of the reasons specified in sections 8 and 9....... Thus the Act is very clear that response must be from the PIO even though he may take help from other officer. Similarly first appeal must be handled by the officer to whom the appeal was made. Sec 19(6) states An appeal under sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) shall be disposed of within thirty days of the receipt of the appeal or within such extended period not exceeding a total of forty-five days from the date of filing thereof, as the case may be, for reasons to be recorded in writing. Here the Act does not say any officer can dispose off the appeal. Thus it must be the officer to whom the appeal is made must dispose it off. If the applicant / appellant is satisfied with the reply the matter ends there. But if he is not satisfied he can appeal / complain to IC that application / appeal was not replied if he gets the reply from officer other than PIO / AA. |
|
#2
| |||||
| |||||
The RTI query must be answered by the PIO to whom the application was sent. Sec 7(1) states Subject to the proviso to sub-section (2) of section 5 or the proviso to sub-section (3) of section 6, the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, on receipt of a request under section 6 shall, as expeditiously as possible, and in any case within thirty days of the receipt of the request, either provide the information on payment of such fee as may be prescribed or reject the request for any of the reasons specified in sections 8 and 9....... Thus the Act is very clear that response must be from the PIO even though he may take help from other officer. Similarly first appeal must be handled by the officer to whom the appeal was made. Sec 19(6) states An appeal under sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) shall be disposed of within thirty days of the receipt of the appeal or within such extended period not exceeding a total of forty-five days from the date of filing thereof, as the case may be, for reasons to be recorded in writing. Here the Act does not say any officer can dispose off the appeal. Thus it must be the officer to whom the appeal is made must dispose it off. If the applicant / appellant is satisfied with the reply the matter ends there. But if he is not satisfied he can appeal / complain to IC that application / appeal was not replied if he gets the reply from officer other than PIO / AA. |
| The Following User Says Thank You to rajub For This Useful Post: | ||
mauryavip (11-29-2008) | ||
|
#3
| |||||
| |||||
Strictly speaking only the PIO has to sign the info. But if the Head, who is superior to the PIO has signed it, does it really matter? As long as we get the info that we want, we should not bother much about the legal niceties. Since the seal of the office is there it must be as valid as the info furnished by the PIO. |
| The Following User Says Thank You to taurus For This Useful Post: | ||
mauryavip (11-29-2008) | ||
![]() |
| Tags |
| rti designations |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Application rejected for the reason that it was not signed | visakhvs | Ask for RTI Query | 14 | 10-22-2008 06:29 AM |
| Indemnity bond to be signed by Co-op. socy managing comittee members | anilag52 | Ask for RTI Query | 4 | 10-06-2008 06:16 AM |
| Is there any time limit the CAPIO/CPIO need to reply back. | opsharma | Ask for RTI Query | 3 | 05-16-2008 07:23 AM |
| Is Signature of PIO/CPIO a must on the reply... | karira | Ask for RTI Query | 20 | 04-13-2008 12:38 PM |
| Whether information is to be signed | ravidurairaj | Ask for RTI Query | 4 | 02-15-2008 03:11 PM |
Copyrights | New to Site? | Need Help? |
|
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 Forum Answers by - Gio~Logist - Vbulletin Solutions & Services
Web Technologies by Dr. Kushal Pathak |