RTI INDIA- Right to Information - Blogs - southwind

Spio wbpar delays transfering of rti application by 55 days, faa acknowledges it

southwind — Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:07:01 GMT

RTI APPLN TO WBPAR DATED DEC 2 2011
FAA DATED JAN 19 2012
FAA ORDER DATED FEB 6TH 2012, STATING THAT, AS PER PROVISIONS OF 6(3)(ii) THE RTI APPLICATIONS (2) WERE TRANSFERED TO SPIO, HOME(RTI) AND THE SAME COMMUNICATED TO ME, THE APPLICANT VIDE SPIO LETTE DATED JAN 25, 2012, WHEREAS THE SPIO LETTER DATED JAN 25, 2012 NEVER REACHED ME SOFAR.

INCIDENTALLY THE FAA IS NONE OTHER THAN THE SPECIAL SECRETARY TO GOVT OF WEST BENGAL, PERSONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS DEPARTMENT, WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS WHO DONOT CARE FOR THE DELAY CAUSED IN TRANSFERING THE RTI APPLICATION.

THE FAA DID NOT READ THE SECTION PROPERLY, WHICH READS, THAT THE TRANSFER, UNDER ALL CIRCUMSTANCES BE DONE WITHIN 5 DAYS OF RECEIPT OF THE APPLICATION AND IMMEDIATELY INFORMED TO THE APPLICANT.

NOW THE AMBIGUITY IS CREATED IN TWO ASPECTS.
1. WHO IS ANSWERABLE FOR THE DELAY IN TRANSFER AND HOW THE RTI ACT HANDLES THE VIOLATION OF TIME SCHEDULE UNDER SEC 6(3)(ii), AND\
2. WHICH DATE DOES THE RTI APPLICANT GO BY, IS IT THE SUBMISSION DATE + 5 , OR THE ACTIAL DATE ON WHICH THE SPIO OF THE OTHER DEPARTMENT RECEIVED IT, AND

BACK DATING TECHNIQUE USED: HOW COME A LETTER DATED FEB 6, 2012 UNDER SPEED POST REACH ME ON FEB 8TH 2012 AND A LETTER PURPORTEDLY POSTED ATLEAST ON JAN 27, 2012 NEVER REACH ME? WHERE IS TRANSPERANCY ?

IN BOTH THE CASES THE APPLICANT IS VICTIMISED.

PLS CHECK THE ATTACHMENTS, WHICH ARE SELF EXPLAINATORY, AND KINDLY COMMENT.

Attached Thumbnails

Attached Files

RTI LETTER TO WEST BENGAL PERSONAL & ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS DEPARTMENT (WBPAR)

southwind — Fri, 02 Dec 2011 12:39:34 GMT

RTI 0212011 WBPAR GOVERNOR LTR DT 9TH JULY 2010.pdf RTI 0212011 WBPAR GOVERNOR LTR DT 24TH MARCH 2011.pdfPLS FIND BELOW TWO LETTERS TO WBPAR

FIRST LETTER

To Dated : December 2nd 2011.

The Assistant Secretary & SPIO
Administrative Reforms Cell
Block IV, 2nd Floor, Writers Building Kolkata 700001

Sir,
Sub: An application under the provisions of RTI Act, 2005

The undersigned is interested to have the foll. information as per the provisions of Sec. 6(1) of RTI Act, 2005.

A letter numbered 2383-S dated July 9th 2010 from Shri. Chandan Sinha, Secretary to the Governor of W.B, addressed to Shri. Samar Ghosh, Additional Chief Secretary, Govt. Of W.B, Dept. of Home was sent wherein it is mentioned that "His Excellency the Governor desires that the matter may kindly be looked into at the earliest. He would also like to have a position note on the case."

1. Please sent the photocopy of the reply to the letter mentioned above, by the Addl. Chief Secretary along with all its enclosures.
2. If no such report is sent, please state if any interim report is sent in this matter.
3. If no report sent, please mention the reason for non abidance of an instruction from a superior.
4. Please also mention if such non abidance of instruction from a superior bureaucrat is brought to the attention of Chief Secretary or his immediate superior or his reporting official/department.
5. If so the office memo number and date of such referral and the reply to such referral and its current status.. If such lapse is not brought to the knowledge of Chief Secretary, Please mention as to whom does the Addl. Chief Secretary report to or accountable to. Does such lapse of timely reply to a Governor Office's letter considered as a 'DISIPLINARY ISSUE' and 'DEPARTMENTAL PROCEEDINGS INITIATED' on him . If no please quote such rule under which it does not amount to disciplinary issue. Also please mention the official who has the authority to take disciplinary action and if waiver or leniance is granted, pleae mention if such official has the right to exercise lenience or any such leverage.
6. If the reason for (3) above is administrative, staffing adequacy or manpower skill related, please inform does it mean that the staffing administrated by P&AR department is ineffective and inadequate when compared with the actual situation whcih leaded to the lapse, or what action did Addl. Chief Secretary took to check non recurrence of such lapse in future.
7. Did the Addl. Chief Secy. brought to the operational problem he faced in discharge of his duty to his reporting official or P&AR Dept. Which is in-charge for the staffing oas per this weblink http://wbpar.banglarmukh.com/portal/...inks&mode=view . If so by which official memo number and date and what reply he got for such escallation.
8. If P&AR is intimated of the manpower / staffing situation that led to such delay, please inform as to what action did the department took and the current status of all such cases and in specific to the subjet matter of this RTI application.
9. Please reply with supporting documentary proof/photocopy with complete details as to how many letters did Addl. Chief Secretary received from the Governor's office from March 2010 to Sept 2011 and how he disposed each such letter with relevant official memo details, attachments and photocopies.
10. Please mention if Addl. Chief Secretary, Home Dept. West bengal is accountable/liable/duty-bound to follow the instruction or reply to a letter/instruction from Secy of Governor of West Bengal as per the rules, regulations, terms and conditions of employment.
The undersigned needs all the information as the word �information� reads in Sec.2(f), to have the �right to information� as it is means in Sec 2.(j) to all the record as it is read in Sec.2(i). Please transfer this application of part of it, if the information sought at or part of it not lying with you, to the public authority with whom the information of part of it is available as per the provisions of Sec.6(3).The undersigned expects an early reply from your end latest by the provision as stated in Sec.7(1). Please note that a court fee of Rs. 10/- is affixed as application fee.

Thanking you,

S. Sridhar, �Mookerjee House�, 2 A Srinath Das Lane, Bowbazar, Kolkata 700012. Phone : 98309 28232.

SECOND LETTER

To Dated : December 2nd 2011.
The Assistant Secretary & SPIO,
Administrative Reforms Cell
Block IV, 2nd Floor, Writers Building Kolkata 700001

Sir,
Sub: An application under the provisions of RTI Act, 2005

The undersigned is interested to have the foll. information as per the provisions of Sec. 6(1) of RTI Act, 2005.

A letter Quoted 'URGENT' numbered 740-SP dated March 24th 2011 from Shri. Chandan Sinha, Secretary to the Governor of W.B, addressed to Shri. G. D. Gautama, Additional Chief Secretary, Govt. Of W.B, Dept. Of Home was sent wherein it is mentioned that "His Excellency the Governor desires that the matter may kindly be looked into directly at your high level and necessary steps taken so that Mr. Sridhar and his family are pacified" and also "A report on the action taken may kindly be sebt URGENTLY for favour of His Excellency's kind information".

1. Please sent the photocopy of the reply, as sought for, sent to this letter by the Addl. Chief Secretary along with all its enclosures.
2. If no such report is sent, please state if any interim report is sent in this matter.
3. If no report sent, please mention the reason for non abidance of an instruction from a superior.
4. Please also mention if such non abidance of instruction from a superior bureaucrat is brought to the attention of Chief Secretary or his immediate superior or his reporting official/department.
5. If so the office memo number and date of such referral and the reply to such referral and its current status.. If such lapse is not brought to the knowledge of Chief Secretary, Please mention as to whom does the Addl. Chief Secretary report to or accountable to. Does such lapse of timely reply to a Governor Office's letter considered as a 'DISIPLINARY ISSUE' and 'DEPARTMENTAL PROCEEDINGS INITIATED' on him . If no please quote such rule under which it does not amount to disciplinary issue. Also please mention the official who has the authority to take disciplinary action and if waiver or leniance is granted, pleae mention if such official has the right to exercise lenience or any such leverage.
6. If the reason for (3) above is administrative, staffing adequacy or manpower skill related, Does it mean that the staffing administrated by P&AR department is ineffective and inadequate when compared with the actual situation whcih leaded to the lapse, or what action did Addl. Chief Secretary took to check non recurrence of such lapse in future.
7. Did the Addl. Chief Secy. brought to the operational problem he faced in discharge of his duty to his reporting official or P&AR Dept. Which is in-charge for the staffing oas per this weblink http://wbpar.banglarmukh.com/portal/...inks&mode=view . If so by which official memo number and date and what reply he got for such escallation.
8. If P&AR is intimated of the manpower / staffing situation that led to such delay what action did the department took and the current status of all such cations and in specific to the subjet matter of this RTI application.
9. Please reply with supporting documentary proof/photocopy with complete details as to how many letters did Addl. Chief Secretary received from the Governor's office from March 2010 to Sept 2011 and how he disposed each such letter with relevant official memo details and photocopies.
10. Please mention if Addl. Chief Secretary, Home Dept. West bengal is accountable/liable/duty-bound to follow the instruction or reply to a letter/instruction from Secy of Governor of West Bengal as per the rules, regulations, terms and conditions of employment.

The undersigned needs all the information as the word �information� reads in Sec.2(f), to have the �right to information� as it is means in Sec 2.(j) to all the record as it is read in Sec.2(i). Please transfer this application of part of it, if the information sought at or part of it not lying with you, to the public authority with whom the information of part of it is available as per the provisions of Sec.6(3).The undersigned expects an early reply from your end latest by the provision as stated in Sec.7(1). Please note that a court fee of Rs. 10/- is affixed as application fee.

Thanking you,

S. Sridhar, �Mookerjee House�, 2 A Srinath Das Lane, Bowbazar, Kolkata 700012. Phone : 98309 28232.

Rti letter to dgp, west bengal

southwind — Fri, 02 Dec 2011 12:31:41 GMT

PLEASE FIND BELOW MY RTI LETTER TO DGP WEST BENGAL FOLLOWED BY FIRST APPEAL LETTER

1. RTI LETTER TO DGP, WEST BENGAL

To Dated : October 10th 2011.

Shri Jayanta Kumar Basu, I.P.S.,
Spl. Inspector General of Police &
Dy. Inspector General of Police (Mod & Cord),
SPIO, West Bengal Police Directorate
Writers' Buildings,
Kolkata-700001

Sub: An application under the provisions of RTI Act, 2005

The undersigned is interested to have the following information as per the provisions of Sec. 6(1) of the RTI Act, 2005.

A letter from Asst. Registrar(LAW), NHRC (Law Division) dated SDept 14th 2011 Case No. 928/25/5/2011/OC is addressed to DGP, Govt. Of West bengal, based on the compliant by S. Sridhar dated August 23rd 2011.

The letter states that the complaint contained therein was placewd before the commission on Sept 9th 2011 and the complaint is transmitted to DGP, WB, the 'CONCERNED AUTHORITY' for its disposal at your end.

1. The complete detail of the disposal of the case.
2. If the same is not yet disposed, the current state of the case/issue/process of disposal and proposed disposal date.
3. If for any reason, the communication is not received by your office, I beg to treat the attached communication copy as advance copy and do the needful at the earliest and communicate to the undersigned the development on the basis of the events.

The undersigned needs all the information as the word �information� reads in Sec.2(f), to have the �right to information� as it is means in Sec 2.(j) to all the record as it is read in Sec.2(i). Please transfer this application of part of it, if the information sought at or part of it not lying with you, to the public authority with whom the information of part of it is available as per the provisions of Sec.6(3).The undersigned expects an early reply from your end latest by the provision as stated in Sec.7(1). Please note that a court fee of Rs. 10/- is affixed as application fee.

Thanking you,

S. Sridhar,
Husband of Dr. Manju Mookerjee (Sridhar)
�Mookerjee House�, 2 A Srinath Das Lane, Bowbazar,
Kolkata 700012. Phone : 98309 28232.

2. FIRST APPEAL LETTER TO DGP, WEST BENGAL

Dated : November 18th 2011.

To

Shri Kuldiep Singh, I.P.S.
Director General & Inspector General of Police ( Organisation ) West Bengal,
Appellate Authority of RTI Act for the West Bengal Police Directorate.
Writer's Building,
Kolkata 700001.

Respected Sir,

Under the provisions of RTI Act 2005, I inform and request as below:

1. That I submitted an application dated October 11th to The SPIO and Spl. Inspector General of Police & Dy. Inspector General of Police (Mod & Cord), West Bengal Police Directorate, Writers' Buildings, Kolkata-700001 with requisite Court Fee.
2. That the time limit specified by the Act lapsed and no reply is received till date, causing �deemed refusal of my RTI Applications�.
3. I request the provisions of the RTI Act may be applied and pray to provide me the information within statutory time limit as per the Act.

A photocopy of my original RTI application is attached for your reference.

Yours truly,

S. Sridhar,
H/o. Dr. Manju Mookerjee (Sridhar),
�Mookerjee House�
2 A, Srinath Das Lane,
Bowbazar,
Kolkata 700012.
Phone: 9830928232

Attached Files

Two letters to governor of west bengal,rajbhawan, kolkata and one first alleal letter for both

southwind — Fri, 02 Dec 2011 12:24:45 GMT

PLS FIND TWO RTI LETTERS TO THE GOVERNOR OF WEST BENGAL FOLLOWED BY FIRST APPEAL LETTER

1. FIRST RTI LETTER TO GOVERNOR OF WEST BENGAL

To Dated : October 10th 2011.

Shri Kumarjib Chakraborty
OSD to the Governor & Deputy Controller and SPIO,
Governor�s (Household) Secretariat, Raj Bhavan, Kolkata 700001

Sub: An application under the provisions of RTI Act, 2005

The undersigned is interested to have the following information as per the provisions of Sec. 6(1) of the RTI Act, 2005.

Please refer to letter No. 3492M dated Sept. 23Rd 2011 from Shri. Kumarib Chakraborty, WBSC(Exe.) SPIO for Governor's Secretariate, Rajbhawan, Kolkata to Mr. S.Sridhar R/o. 2 A, Srinath Das Lane, Bowbazar, Kolkata_700012 in reply to his RTI letter dated Sept. 9, 2011.

1. In Point No. 1 of it, it is stated that an official memo No. 2383-S dated July 9th 2010 is sent to The Addl. Chief Secretary, Dept. Of Home, Writers' Building, Kolkata and in Point 3 it is stated that,
'no correspondence has been received by the Governor's Secretariate in the matter'
As no such reply received even after fourteen months, kindly mention the action taken, suo moto,
by His excellency, The Governor's office.
If no such action taken, kindly mention what such petitioner should do and who is responsible for such petition requesting Governor's recommendation for refering a Kolkata Police/West Bengal Administration Inaction/Failure case to CBI.

2. In Point No. 2 it is mentioned that email dated March 23rd 2011 has been forwarded to The Addl. Chief Secretary, Dept. Of Home, Writers' building, vide office memo No. 740-SP dtd March 24th 2011, and also an action taken report(ATR) has been sought for, for favour of His Excellency's kind information.
Please send a photocopy of such reply/ATR received from The Addl. Chief Secretay, Dept. Of Home,
by His excellency, The Governor's office.
If no such ATR received even after six months, kindly mention the action taken, suo moto,
If no such action taken, kindly mention what the petitioner should do and who is responsible for such petition requesting Governor's recommendation for refering a Kolkata Police/West Bengal Administration Inaction/Failure case to CBI.
The undersigned needs all the information as the word �information� reads in Sec.2(f), to have the �right to information� as it is means in Sec 2.(j) to all the record as it is read in Sec.2(i). Please transfer this application of part of it, if the information sought at or part of it not lying with you, to the public authority with whom the information of part of it is available as per the provisions of Sec.6(3).The undersigned expects an early reply from your end latest by the provision as stated in Sec.7(1). Please note that a court fee of Rs. 10/- is affixed as application fee.
Thanking you,

S. Sridhar, Husband of Dr. Manju Mookerjee (Sridhar)
�Mookerjee House�, 2 A Srinath Das Lane, Bowbazar,
Kolkata 700012. Phone : 98309 28232.

2. SECOND RTI LETTER TO GOVERNOR OF WEST BENGAL

To Dated : October 17th 2011.

Shri Kumarjib Chakraborty
OSD to the Governor & Deputy Controller and SPIO,
Governor�s (Household) Secretariat,
Raj Bhavan, Kolkata 700001

Sir,

Sub: An application under the provisions of RTI Act, 2005

The undersigned is interested to have the foll. information as per the provisions of Sec. 6(1) of RTI Act, 2005.

Please refer to your RTI reply letter No. 3492M dated September 23rd 2011. It is mentioned in it that the 'petition requesting Honorable Governor of West Bengal's recommendation to refer the three time burglary case to CBI' is forwarded to Addl. Chief Secretary, Dept. Of Home, Writers' Buildings with instruction to look into the matter at the earliest vide office memo no. 2383-S dated July 9th 2010.

1. Please mention who/which official is responsible for/designated with the disposal of a petition addressed to Honorable Governor of West bengal.
2. Kindly send me the photocopy of office memo/order/work allocation protocol document to that effect alongwith photocopy of minutes of any meeting conducted any time in past regarding such work allocation/delegation of work/power/duty for disposal of a citizen's petition.
3. Please inform me with documentary proof that under who's initiative/instruction such forwarding happened and who drafted/worded such forwarding letter. The office memo no. 2383-S contained the wording 'at the earliest' and the memo was dated July 9th 2010. What time range does the phrase 'at the earliest' mean in terms of the office of the officer who forwarded this letter. Does he has any onus to look to it if any reply comes from the addressee and if not coming does he has mandate to send reminder. If any such reminder sent please send me the photocopies of all such reminders. If no such follow-up 'dispatch of reminder letters' happened who is responsible for obtaining a reply from Addl. Chief Secy. Dept. Of Home, Writers' Building. Does it mean Addl. Chief Secy of Dept of Home not answerable to a letter from Governor of West Bengal.
4. While the petitioner, in her petition requested Honorable Governor's recommendation to refer the case to CBI, the RTI reply states that the petitioner's letter is forwarded on July 9th 2010 to Addl, Chief Secretary, Dept. of Home, with instruction 'to look into the matter at the earliest'. Please inform that how such referral or forwarding of a petition be a solution or means to a solution to the petitioner. If such forwarding is done as a means to a solution, what follow-up action taken and what is the response for such follow-up activity. If no such action taken what alternative action did the Governor's Office taken suo-moto ?
5. Please inform as to the details below. (1)Number of petition received by The Governor to refer any case to CBI inquiry since August 2009 to till date. (2) What sort of activity/correspondence taken in each such case and the present status of all such cases.
The undersigned needs all the information as the word �information� reads in Sec.2(f), to have the �right to information� as it is means in Sec 2.(j) to all the record as it is read in Sec.2(i). Please transfer this application of part of it, if the information sought at or part of it not lying with you, to the public authority with whom the information of part of it is available as per the provisions of Sec.6(3).The undersigned expects an early reply from your end latest by the provision as stated in Sec.7(1). Please note that a court fee of Rs. 10/- is affixed as application fee.

Thanking you,

S. Sridhar, Husband of Dr. Manju Mookerjee (Sridhar)
�Mookerjee House�, 2 A Srinath Das Lane, Bowbazar,
Kolkata 700012. Phone : 98309 28232.

3. FIRST APPEAL LETTER TO GOVERNOR OF WEST BENGAL

Dated : November 16th 2011.

To

Shri Dipak Kumar Gautam,
OSD & Ex-Officio Special Secretary to the Governor
Governor�s Secretariat,
Raj Bhavan,
Kolkata.

Respected Sir,

Under the provisions of RTI Act 2005, I inform and request as below:

1. That I submitted two RTI application dated October 10th and October 17th
to The SPIO, Rajbhavan, Kolkata with requisite Court Fee.
2. That the time limit specified by the Act lapsed and no reply is received till date, causing �deemed refusal of my RTI Applications�.
3. I request the provisions of the RTI Act may be applied and pray to provide me the information within statutory time limit as per the Act.

A photocopy of my original RTI application is attached for your reference.

Yours truly,

S. Sridhar,
H/o. Dr. Manju Mookerjee (Sridhar),
�Mookerjee House�
2 A, Srinath Das Lane,
Bowbazar,
Kolkata 700012.
Phone: 9830928232

Attached Thumbnails

Attached Files

My rti letter and first alleap letter to cmo, west bengal

southwind — Fri, 02 Dec 2011 12:14:28 GMT

PLS FIND BELOW THE TEXT FORM OF MY RTI LETTER TO CMO, WB FOLLOWED BY FIRST APPEAL LETTER

RTI LETTER TO CMO OF WEST BENGAL AS BELOW

To Dated : October 13, 2011.

Shri Pushpendu Das
Assistant Secretary & Public Information Officer under RTI Act,
Chief Ministers Office, Writers' Buildings, Block F, First Floor,
Kolkata 700001

Sir,

Sub: An application under the provisions of RTI Act, 2005

The undersigned is interested to have the following information as per the provisions of Sec. 6(1) of the RTI Act, 2005. It is also requested to kindly reply along with the photocopy of all documents.

A petition requesting CM's permission to refer her THREE TIME BURGLARY case to CBI was sent by
Dr. Manju Mookerjee, of 'Mookerjee House' 2 A, Srinath Das Lane, Bowbazar, Kolkata 700012 to CMO on Jue 29th 2010.

Apart from prayer to refer the case to CBI, the letter also stated in detail, the INACTION of various Administrative Departments of West Bengal Administrative Officials in general and KOLKATA POLICE, HOME(POLICE) DEPARTMENT, Chief secretary's Ofice, WB Information Commission, West Bengal Human Rights commission, KMC, WEBLAS and WRITER'S BUILDING in specific. It also stated the innumerable lapses, negligence, willful delays, falso information and casual manner of the handling of her FIVE 'SECOND APPEALS' by The WBIC.

The letter also pin pointed the officials responsible for such HIGH-HANDED approach of an aggrieved innocent lonely Lady, who is already a victim of three time burglary and at risk of her life.

1. Please state the responsibility of a CM, under The Constitutuion of India, in disposing of a citizen's petition to refer a case of 'THREE TIME BURGLARY' and persistent life risk case to CBI, after failure of major administrative departments of the state who are responsible and answerable to such victim.

2. Please state the manner in which CMO disposed this petition, in contrast with the CM's duties to the citizen as assumed upon Swearing-in Oath, with photocopy of all documents, whereever it exist.

3. Please furnish all correspondence sent to and received by the CMO in this regard, including that sent/received to the petitioner.

4. If the petitioner's reqeust for CBI inquiry is not considered and no other solution communicated, did the CM take the moral, social and financial responsibility for the life and property of the petitioner and agree to compensate for any loss/pain/injury suffered, in past or future by the CM.

5. If no correspondence initiated by CMO, the reason therefor.

...Page 2/

- 2 -

6. If no reply / correspondence is sent to the petitioner who is ACCOUNTABLE for such NIL response.

7. Does such 'NIL RESPONSE' by CM amount to 'NGLIGNECE/INEFFICIENTY/INACTION OF CHIEF MINISTER OF WEST BENGAL IN DISCHARGING HIS/HER DUTY TOWARDS A CITIZEN' vis-a-vis the duties of the CM to uphold the constititional rights ?

8. If the CMO initiated any sort of inquiry based on the petition, please furnish all such outward and inward correspondence therefor.

9. If no such initiative taken, please mention what is the moral responsibility of The CM under the case.

10. If initiative taken and no reply received from the Officials/Departments to whom communicated, what is the SUO-MOTO action taken by CMO on such officials.

11. If no such SUO-MOTO action taken by CMO, what administrative/disciplinary/penal/departmental action taken by the CMO on such inefficient officials?

12. What is the moral responsibility of the CM for such GROSS NIL RESPONSE/FAILURE of Department/Administrative Machinery/Functionaries under such CM.

As provided for in the RTI Act, kindly support each reply/information with adequate and detail documentary proof by attaching the photocopy of all such documents wherever it exist/existed, in whichever form it exist/existed, in good readable condition.

The undersigned needs all the information as the word �information� reads in Sec.2(f), to have the �right to information� as it is means in Sec 2.(j) to all the record as it is read in Sec.2(i).

Please transfer this application of part of it, if the information sought at or part of it not lying with you, to the public authority with whom the information of part of it is available as per the provisions of Sec.6(3).The undersigned expects an early reply from your end latest by the provision as stated in Sec.7(1). Please note that a court fee of Rs. 10/- is affixed as application fee.

Thanking you,

S. Sridhar, Husband of Dr. Manju Mookerjee (Sridhar)
�Mookerjee House�, 2 A Srinath Das Lane, Bowbazar,
Kolkata 700012. Phone : 98309 28232.

FIRST APPEAL LETTER TO CMO, WEST BENGAL AS BELOW

Dated : November 16th 2011.

To

The Appellate Authority under RTI Act,
Chief Miniser's Office,
Writer's Building,
Kolkata.

Respected Sir,

Under the provisions of RTI Act 2005, I inform and request as below:

1. That I submitted an RTI application dated October 14th vide receipt number 2433 (Copy attached) to The SPIO, CMO, Writer's Building, Kolkata with requisite Court Fee.
2. That the time limit specified by the Act lapsed and no reply is received till date, causing �deemed refusal of my RTI Applications�.
3. I request the provisions of the RTI Act may be applied and pray to provide me the information within statutory time limit as per the Act.

A photocopy of my original RTI application is attached for your reference.

Yours truly,

S. Sridhar,
H/o. Dr. Manju Mookerjee (Sridhar),
�Mookerjee House�
2 A, Srinath Das Lane,
Bowbazar,
Kolkata 700012.
Phone: 9830928232

Attached Thumbnails

Attached Files

Notice from wbhrc to dy. Commissioner, central division, kolkata policeseeking report within 3 weeksport on burglary

southwind — Tue, 22 Nov 2011 19:58:33 GMT

Please check the attached file, where a report is called for by
WBHRC on Dy. Commissioner of Police, Central Divison, Kolkata dated
Nov 4th 2009, which is never reported, ATLEAST TILL Nov 2011.

Attached Thumbnails

Kolkata police not coming under rti act, deemed refusal is ignored by wbic by just serving warning letter, no info given

southwind — Tue, 22 Nov 2011 07:12:54 GMT

Dear ALL,

I would request you to kindly read this long detailed complaint letter and you at the end you will realise that 'LACK OF TRANSPERANCY, PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY' COATED WITH CORRUPTION AND MISUSE OF POWER go 'hand-in-glove' with the nexus between WBIC (SIC) and the Home Ministry Bureaucrats in hiding ugly facts from being disclosed. Ignoring deemed rejection by SPIO, Kolkata Police inspite of warnings being given by WBIC in earlier cases goes to prove that Law-Keeper becoming Law-Breaker, AND ignoring this anomalies by WBIC INSPITE OF SECOND Appeal just means WBIC ACTING CONTEMPT OF COURT. (PLS REFER ATTACHMENT '45 DAYS').

Also check the link http://thestatesman.net/index.php?op...36740&catid=72

UNANSWERED DETAILED COMPLAINT LETTER BY COMMISSIONER OF KOLKATA POLICE

Dated November 14th 2010

To

The commissioner of Police
Kolkata Police.

Further to my complaint dated May 6th 2010 (appended below) for which you had constituted an inquiry (?) session on May 19th 2010, myself and my husband Mr. S. Sridhar with Mr. Sailesn Sil of Grievance Cell of Kolkata Police HQ, the report of which is yet to be received.

The following is the list of defaults Kolkata Police made with respect to my burglary case:

1. Several RTI applications seeking factual information on my burglary cases stands WILFULLY DEFAULTED both by SPIO and Appellate Authority under RTI act, Kolkata Police. Copy of office memo, giving instruction to the concerned department/office to reply to RTI letter at the earliest and also sating that non compliance do attract personal financial penalty, by The SPIO reached m. But not the reply.
2. Three weeks time bound NOTICE issued by the One member bench of WBHRC sent to DC � Central on November 2009 which is yet to be taken stock of.
3. Justice demanded notice to Commissioner of Police dated August 10th 2010, unanswered. (copy annexed below)
4. Numerous communications sent by Writer�s Building (Both Home Political Department and Public grievance Cell) instruction action and earlier reporting of proper investigation to nab the culprit and recover the valuables stands unattended yet. (dated October to December 2009)
5. Notice from NHRC directing Commissioner of Police seeking a report on the repeat burglary events. (Dated Sept. 2010)
6. Communication from Central Govt. department of Public Grievance dated April 2010, issued to chief Secretary of West Bengal which is safely �UNTRACEABLE� seeking report on the burglary case.
7. Numerous emails requiring attention, action and resolution from the Kolkata Police Chief unanswered. (few copies of such emails annexed )

All these defaults, failures, lapses are committed by Kolkata Police, The Guardian of Law for Kolkata.

In spite of three burglary events committed by the same criminal, who is non other than the Owners and inmates of premises 2 B, Srinath Das Lane, Bowbazar, Kolkata 700012, in nexus with Bowbazar Friends Society and Bowbazar P.S., Your efficient Officers had not taken any tough and fruitful action, thus safeguarding the culprit in social disguise and rendering anti-civilian and anti-constitutional activities.

Yesterday (November 13th 2010), Mr. Souradipta Banerjee, the accused in my complaint letter dated May 6th 2010 knocked at my door and again along with his labour men who came with thick long ropes ( to climb down to my courtyard from their house, namely building No. 2 B, Srinath Das Lane) troubled me on the pretext of CLEANING MY COURTYARD BY HIS PERSON AT HIS COST which actually do not need any cleaning. THIS TONE ITSELF SHOWS HIS EAGERNESS TO TRESPASS MY PROPERTY which they exactly did in the third event of theft which the local PS did not act upon inspite of booking an FIR.

Ms. Shampa Banerjee, the owner of the said 2 B, Srinath Das Lane called me in my mobile phone 9836546975 on Nov 13th 2010 and spoke in instructing tone to clear out the small plants in my PRIVATE court yard. Rather it is a nuisance that, he and his family people use my court yard as garbage yard, throwing plastic wastes such as shampoo sachets, soap papers, plastic tea cups, water cups, waste papers, spoiled food and paper food plates, spoiled food, even they spit cough. When they have party at their house our courtyard is their waste-bin. We do not want to make issue with unworthy people and clean our place within our means and keep silent and peace. Also they trespassed at the top floor when they made some repair at their top floor, they sent their labour across their boundary wall to my top floor to do cementing at our side, without our permission even though we were available there. Also they did sililar encroachment by diverting their kitchen chimney by breaking the wall of our house, making a vent to their kitchen oil and smoke into our courtyard. Also when they did flooring all the thick waste water of floor polish were poured into my courtyard, making it much inconvenient and stagnation and chocking the drainage, which we dealt with calm and patience. All these patience of ours were taken as our cowardness and they launched a well planned strategy taking local PS as a party the crime and now they are aiming at the possession of my property itself. I, the only owner and possessor of my house is in their next hit list (like what they did to Mr. Kalyan Banerjee who was residing in the ground fllor of 2 B Srinath Das Lane, he was framed false story and brutally kicked/battered by the members of BFS and thrown out.

HOW CAN MY NEIGHBOUR OFFER TO CLEAN MY COURT AT HIS COST ? WHAT INTEREST HE HAS IN MY PROPERTY? My court is my property and exclusively at my disposal. If the Kolkata Police is not giving protection to me and donot nab the mischief creators, I may have to file a case for inaction of police. As per the Partition deed declared by the Honourable Judges of Calcutta High Court in 1968, they do not have any right even to have window on the wall facing my courtyard, leave alone the chance to open it inwards. Being a law practicing person, the causeless nuisance, emotional torture & pain and mental agony and disturbance caused by Mr.Souradipta Banerjee is highly condemnable and only proves his intention to provoke me, trouble me and see to it that I do not live my life peacefully at my place within my means.

At one time the OC of Bowbazar PS showed that Mr. Souradipta Banerjee gave him a copy of the private trust deed which is made for the property of this house between Late. Dr. Surapriya Mookerjee and the prospective trustees. During the burglary masterminded by my the owners of 2 b, Srinath Das Lane all my vital Legal, Bank, Asset, Ancestral documents were missing which I clearly made out in my complaint letters. How come my personal document can be at his hands. This proves crystal clear that the culprit is none other than M/s. Banerjees of 2 B, Srinath Das Lane. The grudge to grab the front portion of the unpartitioned property of �No. 2, MOOKERJEE HOUSE� was there in them while they filed for partition which is still live and cause for the burglary and subsequent mental, emotional and social harassment to me. It is easily possible for M/s. Banerjees to prepare a fake document as they had well gathered all the vital documents of my house and other property and even forge the signature of Dr. Surapriya Mookerjee and claim ownership by hook or crook to my property, which is totally ignored by Kolkata Police.

Inspite of several petitions stating that my life and property at risk by the Owners/Residents of 2 B Srinath Das Lane and the officials/members of Bowbazar friends Society, Kolkata Police miserable failed to entrust their constitutional duty towards me as a citizen of India. I am always followed/monitored/traced/observed my exit and ingress noted and my constitutional liberty of movement and peaceful life is hampered by the following people, Chandan Ghosh, Shankar Das (he urinates in front of my house), Nilkamal, Puti, Dhokdoki all are members of Bowbazar Friends Society. Mr. Chandan keep posted in front of my house main entrance, daily, on pretext of talking over phone and always note my movement, my interactions within and outside my house. I do not feel safe even to enter or exit my house at times. While his house is situated at the end of common passage between my house and 1/1 Srinath Das Lane, what business he has to be posted in front of my house door is objectionable by all means. My constitutional liberty is encroached.

I also openly state that Kolkata Police is collectively responsible for any sort of damage, loss, injury, encroachment, mental agony, emotional torture to me, my property, my belongings and my family members as Kolkata Police did not deliver their duty of giving protection to me as a victim.

It is the inmates of 2 B, Srinath Das Lane who always pollutes my courtyard by throwing shampoo sachets, plastic plates, plastic covers, rotten foods, spitting of cough, etc.,

I reiterate that I am staying alone in my house as my husband is busy with his occupation. As mentioned above Ms. Shampa donot have any right to have any window on the wall facing my court yard as per the partition decree of Calcutta High court. Any deviation to that is an offense and contempt of court and amounts to violation of partition settlement.

Ms. Shampa also told that if I donot clear-up my courtyard she will take me to task. It is natural that small plants do grow in courtyard due to presence of soil and due to wetness of water. And moreso, it is my piece of land and my courtyard on which Ms. Shampa Banerjee and others donot have any right to interfere. This amounts to trespassing my freedom and liberty over my property which is my constitutional right and �Police Force� is created by Law to protect constitutional rights. (as per Kolkata Police mission statement)

I humbly beg the Kolkata Police to upkeep their mission of upholding the duties entrusted to it by the Constitution of India and not to let any miscreants do mischief and trouble both to my life and property, not only personally but emotionally too.

My liberty of movement is hampered by these nuisance creating elements. My presence and absence at my house is closely monitored by them. I am always being observed by Ms. Shampa Banerjee. (her son told me that I do not visit my courtyard for past 40 days when he spoke to me on May 1st 2010, and Ms. Shampa was inquiring to my husband, �WHEN WILL MANJU RETURN FROM CHENNAI� whenever he was sighted by her during the months of June and July 2009)

Given the above complete details I require the Kolkata Police to protect my constitutional rights, secure form my life and property and let me live a peaceful life.

Manju Mookerjee Sridhar & S. Sridhar
�Mookerjee House�
2 A, Srinath Das Lane
Bowbazar,
Kolkata 700012.
MB 9836546975 / 9830928232
END OF LETTER
***********

BELOW ARE ATTACHMENTS/ANNEXURES TO THE ABOVE LETTER

ATTACHMENT 1- DETTER TO CP

Dated : May 6, 2010

From

Mrs. Manju Mookerjee (Sridhar)
�Mookerjee Houe�
2 A, Srinath Das Lane
Bowbazar,
Kolkata 700012
PH 2237 5052 / 9836546975

To

The Commissioner of Police
Kolkata Police

Sir,

I wish to inform you as below and request you to take necessary action.

At around 10.30 a.m. on May 1st 2010, Mr. SouradiptaBanerjee, S/o. Sourendranath Banerjee, resident of House No 2 B, Srinath Das Lane, Bowbazar knocked at the main gat of my house, i.e., �Mookerjee House�, 2 A, Srinath Das Lane, Bowbazar, Kolkata 700012, and demanded entry for himself and his labour to access to our private courtyard on the pretext that dead rat is there on our courtyard and the stinking smell reaches his house at 1st Floor, 2 B, Srinath Das Lane.

He argued that none of us had gone to our courtyard for the past one month. I told that I and my wife Manju Mookerjee were busy over our own appointment and it is not possible for us to give entry into our courtyard at present. I told that if he could have made a prior appointment, it would have been convenient for us. He told, that he rang up at the telephone number, buy no response, so he came with his labour directly. When I asked him at which telephone number he rang up, he did not reply to it.

He further threatened me that, �If I make inconvenience for him, he will make more and more inconvenience to me. With these words, I stopped my conversation with him, as the motive of his threatening me to gain entry into our private courtyard stating invalid reason of knocking our doors without prior appointment and baseless and ir-rational argument, and putting us to inconvenience and shock.

Within few minutes, at 10.43 he called up form his mobile number 9433096667 to my wife�s mobile number 9836546975 and narrated that I misbehaved with him. He told my wife that he can enter our courtyard at any time and we are bound to let him access and under his supervision his labour will do some clearing activity at our courtyard and if we deny access, he can FIND OUT SOME WAY OR OTHER to reach our courtyard. Also he stated that he can send his labour by putting rope from his building (Premises No. 2 B, Srinath Das Lane) to reach our courtyard. He also told whether we are present or not at our house is immaterial.

He also told that Manju had quoted the name of his mother Mrs. Shampa Banerjee as accused in our complaint of burglaries which happened in our house during August 2009 and November 2009, to the Bowbazar Police Station and they had to face Police Station interrogation within days of our burglary on last week of August.

He told that the OC of Bowbazar Police Station sent phone message that the name of Mrs. Shampa Banerjee is stated as accused. It is shocking that when he invited me to his house in the moth of October 2009, when his mother and wife were present he did not tell any such thing.

It is very clear that in all the three FIR, the Bowbazar Police Station had mentioned the name of the suspect as �UNKNOWN�.

He told that the objects of burglary are recovered from Jadunath Dey Road. When my wife asked him how he knows it, he did not tell an answer. He also told that dead rats in the courtyard is a common feature and the top floor of our house is a breeding place for all the cats in our lane, and these cats and kitten regularly reach his house and is a threat for his family.

He also told that we have left the first and second floor of our house in a very bad condition and somehow existing in our ground floor.

Due to personal reasons we don�t open our windows at first and second floors facing the courtyard wherefrom anyone from 2 B, Srinath Das Lane, can have a view of our house.

Under these circumstances only a person who visited our house can tell such defaming comment on our private house.

The comments of Mr. Souradipta Banerjee about the condition of the first and second/top floors of my house solve the mystery as to who were the culprits behind the burglary.

Now the questions raised from these conversations are:

1. What interest did Mr. Souradipta Banerjee have in my private courtyard?
2. How can a person can state that he can pass rope from his building and enter my courtyard, immaterial of my consent / or in my absence?
3. How and from whom did he come to know about the recovery and the place of recovery of the articles of burglary?
4. How can a person keep a watch over my movement within my house?
5. How an outside person can state about the internal condition of my house?

Yours truly,

Manju Mookerjee
Sent by the email id of My husband, Mr. S. Sridhar.
___________________________________________________________________________

ATTACHMENT 2

Dated August 10th 2010.

From

Mr. S. Sridhar and Mrs. Manju Mookerjee Sridhar
�MOOKERJEE HOUSE�
2 A, Srinath Das Lane
Bowbazar
Kolkata
To

The Commissioner of Police
Kolkata Police Headquarters
Kolkata
Sir,

Ref: My complaint during first week of May 2010
Sub : 1. Justce Demanded in my three FIR�s filed with Bowbazar PS and
2. Threatening call from Mr. Souradipta Banerjee, 2 B, srinath Das Lane.

I made a detail complaint letter and sent to the email id of commissioner of police from my officie email id sridhar.shankaranarayanan@indusind.com about the threat call made to me by Mr.Souradipta Banerjee, 2 B, Srinath Das lane to gain entry into the private courtyard of my house immaterial of my presence at my house of not by passing rope from his top floor. When I and my wife called by Mr. Sil for inquiry, why not the opponent on whom I had complained be summoned there? He also expressed the description and present condition of my house at each floor which is not possible unless he enters my house. He is one amoung the criminals who entered my house in my absebce, as he openly threatened me. Even when a criminal is describing the internatl conditions of my house and planning to send people to my place through rope, why no action is taken against him/them? Why my grievance not acted upon?
Kolkata Police is decided to see that I am farmed to the maximum.Sir, as told to me by Mr. Sailen Sil of your Public Grievance Department, he calle me and my wife for an inquiry regarding the complaint, the complete detail of which is already sent and the hard copy of my mail was in his hands. Still, we co-operted and told the involvement of the direct and indiret owers/inmates of premises 2 B, SrinathDas Lane in all the three crimes registered under three FIRs by the Bowbazar PS during August and Novemer 2009. After heringfrom us Mr. Sil told that he will give a report of his observation to you. This visit of mine with Mr. Sil took place on Mat around 6.00 p.m.
I also spoke to Mr. Sil to know the outcome of my visit. He denied that he is not answerable or duty bound to disclose us the contents of the report of our inquiry/visit he had with us.

As the Chief of Kolkata Police and TOP Official, I require yourself to reply me the reason for no communication from your department to me, the victim who is facing life and property risk from my neighbour, i.e. the owner s of B, srinath Das Lane.
Also when I first met you at your chamber at Lalbazar and told the truth that the crime is not an accidental and by �UNKNOWN� person/s, but it is conspired by anexus between the inmates of B, Srinath Das Lane, Bowbazar, the people of Bowbazar Friends� Society and Bowbazar PS. This is evident from the fact that the OC who visited my house, the place of offence, instead of questioning Mr. Chandan Ghosh, main person behind BFS, for illegal erection of Durga Puja Pandal in a an unusual place and at unusual time, The OC was talking found talking to Mr. Chandan Ghosh in unusually friendly manner by putting his hands over the shoulder of Mr. Chandan and took him towards Nirmal chandra Street. What is the reason for such informal and unprofessional manner of behaviour of OC of Bowbazar with one of the suspect of our burglary?

Sir, when I asked about the development of my case to you you initially told that AC DDI is looking after this and asked me to contact him. After few moths, when I reported about the third event of burglary, instead of hearing to me of the third incident you became busy diverting me to DC Central this tme. It is one year completing soon. Sir, have you asked for a report from AC-DDI or DC-Central sofar or have they sent you any report? If no please reply me with reason for your not requiring a report inspite of my repeat inquiry/calls/mails to you and if they have not sent a report, kindly inform me the disciplinary action initiated by you towards those irresponsible officials.
It is highly UNBELIEVABLE that Kolkata Police Force not able to crack a simple house-breaking case even in eleven months whereas it generally takes a week�s time for Kolkata Police to crack any case.
Inspite of my repeated complaints / letters / emails / visits / phone calls / RTI applications / Appellate Authority letters, none of your Department or Senior Official, right from OC of Local PS, DC Central, AC � DDI, OC Anti-Burglary Dept, Officials of PG department, SPIO Mr. Niraj Singh, Appellate Authority under RTI Act never do any correspondence / communication / call / reply / report / forward / any of their activity / observation / report / interim report / investigation / decsion / information to me, the victim. When any correspondence from me is taken in writing by your department why I�m not getting any reply from them in writing?
Please treat this letter as �JUSTICE DEMANDED� and arrange to forward a true copy of the report frowarded to you by Mr. Sil with regard to the complaint I emailed to you during May 2010.

As the Chief of Kolkata Police, I am approaching you by this email to demand a reply for the following complaints/petitions lodged by me or my wife in connection with the burglary case as you are the HEAD and FACE of KOLKATA POLICE.

1. The report submitted by SPIO for my RTI Applications dated Feb 2nd 2010, March 3rd 2010 and April 24th 2010.
2. The report submitted by OC Public Grievance Dept, Lalbazar Police HQ against my petition dated Feb 26th 2010.
3. Your reply to my email dated first week of May 2010.
4. A report on the action taken by the Bowbazar PS on all of my three FIRs till date with all supporting documents.
5. Report submitted by Mr T. K. Sinha after his visit to my house on Feb 11th in the month of February 2010
If yourself not the concerned official who has to reply to the above questions, kindly direct me to the AUTHORITY who has transparency enough to disclose me the rightful reply with supporting facts.
Expecting a reply for my complaints and petitions,

S. SRIDHAR / MANJU MOOKERJEE SRIDHAR

NB: Pls take record of my old email id sridhar.shankaranarayanan@indusind.com and new email id seek4sridhar@yahoo.com any email communication to me may please be sent to my new email id.
___________________________________________________________________________

ATTACHMENT � 3

August 20, 2010

From

Mrs. Manju Mookerjee
�MOOKERJEE HOUSE�
2 A, srinath Das Lane
Bowbazar,
Kolkata 700 012.

To,
The commissioner of Police,
Kolkata Police
Lalbazar Street
Kolkata 700 001.

Sir,

Sub : Justice Demanded

My house, No. 2 A, Srinath Das Lane (Mookerjee House) under Bowbazar Police Station, Kolkata � 700012 (constructed in the year 1864 A.D.) touches the Celebrity, Elite Statesmen and First President of Indian National Congress Shri.Womesh Chandra Bonnerjee (1885 A.D.)

My father Late. Shri. Surapriya Mookerjee, M.B.B.S. � Gold Medalist, a veteran in the field of Medicine, Medical Advisory(Albert David Ltd), Orator, Well Travelled, Writer, Sports Journalist (TheStatesmen- Calcutta, Sportstar- Mumbai ) and Connoisior of Art and Artifacts. He was an elite person and Cream of the Society, and his father was Life Member at The Calcuttta Club. He enjoys the high tradition and respect of four fore-fathers Solicitors and Bar-at-law at Calcutta High Court since British Period.

A) FACTS
1. Three repeat offencs of Burglary occurred at the above mentioned residence, two of which had been carried out within a thin span of three days at the time when the previous offence was under invetigation and the Place of Offence being visited by officials of Bowbazar Police Station and inspite of patrol being provided by them.

2. Letter of complaints to PS � FIR � Progress of the Investigation.

(A) First letter of complaint on August 26th 2009, resulting in drawing of FIR No. 219 dated August 26th 2009 and registering the commission of the offences Under Sections 457 and 380 of IPC. Some stolen artiles were deposited in the costody of Bowbazar P.S. on August 21st 2009. I had personally visited the PS and handedover complaint letter and described in detail the description of each article on Aug` 26th, which Mr. Jha noted well, and also visited on Aug 28th, but, surprisingly, the deposit of stolen article were not disclosed to me both the days. Once when I met Dy. Commissioner JawedShamim on Aug 28th 2009, those deposited articles were shown in a unscientific and illogical (STOLEN ARTICLES IN ASSORTED AND RANDON MANNER). The surprising coincidence of granting LEAVE to Investigation Officer from August 27th 2009 and the FIR date August 26th may please be noted.

Status of the Case : No result oriented progress.

I visited my house at around 16.00 Hrs on 26th August 2009 and the moment I found that a burglary had happened in my house and the culprits made entry/exit by breaking open the two securely inside locked wooden doors at the top floor, I immediately ran to Bowbazar Police Station in a state of Panic, Shock, emotional Break-down and Trauma.

The Officials at the Police Station intervened me, and hampered my Liberty and Right in drawinge-up the complaint letter, disturbed while describing the crime in detail, mentioning the suspect�s names, writing complaint letter in full length as I felt necessary, to mention a few. I was so disturbed that I missed to even write my address in the complaint letter. The officials there troubled me by closely watching each sentence of my complaint while I was writing complaint letter and instructed at each sentence as per their requirement, forced upon me what to write and what not to write, to make complaint in strictly one page length only and when I was writing the suspect�s name they stopped me and told when you had not seen them with your own eyes how can you write their names. Strangely Mr. Jha was very eager and enthusiastic to hear from me, the full detail and description of the missing articles and keep jotting down in a paper in his own. If so is the need, why I was stopped and repeatedly disturbed when I was writing the complaint letter ?

When I went to write the detailed description of the list of articles missing, they intervened and told me, only to write the weight and amount of the article. For a person who had her valuables inherited and had no need to value them at any point of time, she could never guess the weight or value. These coersive way of handling a burglary victim itself a violation of Human rights by Bowbazar Polise Station officials which disturbed the victim to write the weight of gold articles at roughly 400 grams when she meant to write 4000 grams which is again a rough guess and the value and weight is much more.

A team of not less than 7 officials from Bowbazar Police Station headed by The Second Officer, Mr. Manoj Jha, visited my house. Even when I insisted them that there is some disturbance in electric supply on the first floor, they carried ONLY ONE battery operated Torch Light, which was very much inadequate compared to the magnitude of damage caused by the culprit. Apart from the torch they never carried any equipment, whatsoever. All the personnels of the team, right from Mr. Jha till the Civil Volunteer put their BARE_HANDS on all the things and objects which had been touched/used/handled/disturbed by the culprits THEREBY WILFULLY DISTURBING the EVIDENCE/CLUE that could have proved VITAL_ESSENTIAL_DESIRABLE to trace out the real culprits. They were ill-equipped, ill-qualified, un-trained, un-ethical and un-mindful to realise their legitimate duty as per constitution and ignored to put their best professional performance and ethics, that are basically expected of the Police Officials, RIGHT FROM THE VERY FIRST STEP.

The Police Personal entered the Place of Offense with inadequate lighting equipment, without Gloves, without even a camera to capture the crime scene, more so they purposely disturbed ALL THE ARTICLES only with a foresighted plan that even a possible forensic process in future will fail in its purpose. The condition and magnitude of damage the culprits made in the Place of Offence, the access points to the Place of Offense, the intensity and extant of carnage, all these should have been captured in a movie camera or at least in a still camera. It is needless to say that now-a-days any lay man has a camera in their mobile phone and the officials of a Police Force like Kolkata Police visiting a Place of Burglary without a camera is understandably funny on the lighter side and shows their intention in making such a grave lapse, which is much unfortunate and a matter of shame and insult to the force itself.

The Place of Offense should have been guarded by POLICE from any sort of disturbance, internal or external, that can pose a threat to possible destruction to evidence/clue/hint that could have been left out by the culprit, and the FORENSIC TEAM SHOULD BE THE ONE TO VISIT A BURGLARY SITE. Also when they saw the entry point into the place of offence the officials should seek for the proximity and immediate vicinity wherefrom the culprits could have entered the PO and put their common sence , professional acumen and acted as a person of ordinary prudence atleast, which they delibrately did not.

When I complained of a burglary and noted without any sort of 'disturbance' that all articles were ransacked, which very clearly means that 'A LOT OF VITAL CLUES' are still available, the officials of Bowbazar Police Station should have teamed up with the Specialist of Burglary, ie., The Officer-in-Charge, Anti-Burglary Cell, LalBazar Police HQ, which is hardly FIVE minutes distance, which the Bowbazar Police Station wilfully ignored for the reasons best known to them. Also the casual, careless, vindictive, haphazard, uncivilised, unprofessional and callous manner they 'HANDLED' the FIRST VISIT, which can be better termed as 'FIRST RAID TO ERASE THE EVIDENCE' only displays their intension in saving the real criminal.

On the second visit (27th August 2009), which is headed by the OC, was no lesser damaging to the first visit. This time OC, who visited the PO for the first time directly approached to one among 4 almirahs which were equally ransacked, to the one where majority of valuables were burgled! He was interested in taking all the scattered objects in the place of offence and observing the sizeof the gold jewellary from the jewel boxes scattered there than finding the PATHWAY through which the criminals entered. He voluntarily told, after observing the broken brass hinges of the top floor door, �A GANG OF 6 TO 7 PEOPLE DID THIS CRIME� After his visit, OC told, �DO NOT DISTURB ANY ARTICLE� , �WE WILL MAKE FORENSIC�

This instruction he gave us after ALL the members of his team including himself SPOILED ALL POSSIBLE EVIDENCE in both their visits. He also told, 'WHATEVER VALUABLES WAS THERE GONE, WHAT YOU WILL DO BY REPAIRING THE DOORS NOW?� By this time OC had well noted what else valuables scattered all around. To quote a few, Silver antique articles, Brass artifacts, Brass antique show-pieces, boxes of coins, were still scattered in the PO.

The second officer had been asking us every day of our visit to Bowbazar Police Station, �are you staying in this house today or not� for all consecutive 3 days of our visit. As we were emotionally broken, we did not stay there and we told him, �no� For our repeated follow-ups over phone and in person, we are told that the 'INVESTIGATION IS GOING ON', WE CANNOT REVEAL THE PROGRESS TO YOU, IT IS CONFIDENTIAL, was the constant answer we got.

(B) Second letter of complaint dated August 30th 2009 resulting in drawing of FIR No 225 dated sept 5th 2009, registering the offiences Under Section 380 of IPC. The delay of 6 days detween date of complaint and date of FIR please be noted.

Status of the Case : No result oriented progress.

The historic event of second burglary in the same place of Offense, in the same manner and by the same criminals is not only shocking but also points out that the culprits are in very near neighborhood to the Place of Offense It is an open challenge that the same brave criminal has given not only ntothe victim, but to the Law Keeper as well. The nexus between the Law Keeper and the criminals is proven beyond doubt. When the OC visited the PO on 27th August 2009, instead of inquiring the neighbors of the crime, he went away with one Mr. Chandan Ghosh, putting his hand over Mr.Chandan Ghosh's shoulder, which is unlikely of a Policeman in uniform and in duty, especially while visiting a Place of offence and inspite of we pointing the Bowbazar Friend�s Society�s pandal erection is the false screen behind which the crime is committed, proves that the OC�s honesty and integrity are questionable.

This time the objectives that the OC and Team had noted lying on the floor of the Place of Offense, which they told us, 'NOT TO DISTURB', the corner almirah which contained boxes of coins and collections, the OC & team noted on their visit, valuables and antique silver make-up set scattered on the floor, legal papers desk which was 'just touched' on the first event got fully ransacked, antique brass show pieces passed to members of criminal gang OPENLY through the window of my ground floor room facing the Srinath das Lane during day time. When we tried to enter our house at around 3.00 pm on 30th August 2009, the wooded main door at the ground floor was bolted from inside, and articles kept across the window and freely passed on.

It is a lapse on part of Kolkata Police that they had not provided effective, adequate care, vigil and security, and lack seriousness in their duty of protecting the interest of its constituents as laid down by the constitution of India.

On August 26th 2009, when a team of people landed up in front of our house in 'POLICE VEHICLE', has already given the message to the culprit-in-disguise of our neighbour, that the case is reported to the Guardian of Law and under investigation.

The criminal who made his second visit on August 30th 2009 is either the persons of the team of Bowbazar Police Station who visited and noted the condition of the Place of Offence, who also instructed us 'DO NOT DISTURB' or the people who masterminded the crime which the Bowbazar Police Station ESCORTED/ASSISTED and till now hiding and saving their identity or Both of them jointly.

The afore said facts is already put to pen and paper to the Complaints Against COPS Department of Kolkata Police and registered under No. 868/03/P.G.Cell/10. Surprisingly, even here, the non accountability, lethargy, inaction and neglecting attitude of Kolkata Police is exhibited. A complaint at Complaints Cell against COPS against Law Keeper is itself a black mark on them and an indicator of unhealthy status of honesty and integrity of the whole of Kolakta Police. On top of it, a registered Complaint is not acted upon even after 'REASONABLE' time and several reminders only shows that the Kolkata Police do not anymore hold the Merit, Credibility, Proves and Might that it is claims itself and unfit to keep up the promise it is entrusted to live-up as per Constitution of India. They failed their purpose.

This gives a ROTTEN message that the Public Tax Payer's money is wasted in feeding the bellies of an unworthy force in disguise of law protector.

While an email at cp@kolkatapolice.gov got an acknowledgment within 10 days, my registered complaint against the officials of the same force does not yield any response even after 3 months which shows the 'COVERING-UP' of the men of the same force is happening. Your officials does not even bother to keep-up the legal deadline stipulated under RTI Act. �HOW CAN PUBLIC TRUST THEM FOR LAW PROTECTION� IS SURE QUESTIONABLE. Where is the Accountability/commitment of Kolkata Police ? Who will come forward from YOUR Force and accept responsibility for the willful lapses, anti-civilian actions, vindictive approach, internal communication, hierarchy, protocol, reporting and other lapses, reporting and replying lapses, internal hygiene and governance? Is the force grown so unruly that the prime requirement of Discipline, Integrity, Prudence, People orientation, Obedience to Law and superiors are grossly avoided ? One gets doubt on the very curriculum of the Police Training Schools and the credibility of IPS academy itself.

(C) Third Letter of Complaint dated Nov 27th 2009 resulting in drawing of FIR No. 299 dated Nov 28th 2009 and registering of the offence Under Secton 380 of IPC

Status of the Case : No result oriented progress.

The third repeat incident is a crystal clear trespass by the inmates of our neighbor premises No. 2 B, Srinath Das Lane, for which the Bowbazar Police registered a ritualistic FIR and traditional inaction. The surprise is that the investigation officer appointed under the FIR never visited the Place of Offense. Whenever I ask about the status of the FIR, we get the usual reply, 'WE ARE INVESTIGATING' Are the Bowbazar PS Officials Brilliant enough to investigate case without even visiting the PO once? They are treating the Public as poppet. How can a police officer state that they are investigating without even visiting the PO ? How is acceptable to the higher-ups to whom they are supposed to report on each case ? The call of open threat I got from my neighbor Mr. Souradipta Banerjee on May 1st 2010 is the vital link that chains the culprits of all the three cases and it is none but himself and his associates. The two officials who visited my house on Nov 28th 2010, visited the window at the Ground Floor of building 2 B Srinath Das lane which is facing our Private Court Yard, did not bother to visit the other side of the picture, that is they never visited the building which the window structure belong to. With this high degree of partiality and open negligence how can the force claim to be �A FRIEND TO PUBLIC�.

Not only at the grass root level, even a the higher level where adherence to time schedule is stipulated by law and even supported by punitive financial fines, the Kolakta Police had failed many a times at many higher levels, for instance, SPIO and APPELLATE AUTHORITY UNDER RTI and WEST BENGAL HUMAN RIGHTS' COMMISSION's notice to D.C.P � Central.

3) Strangely enough those three chain burglaries and theft were committed not by breaking open the main door, but by the adjoining property namely 2 B Srinath Das Lane and 2/1 Srinath Das laneboth of Bowbazar PS, Kolkata 700012., one of which is owned by one with whom the complainant�s premises is patitioned in Kolkata High Court 4 decades back. Thus the entire involvement of the rank outsiders, om the three above mentioned criminal offiences logically become a distant remote. For proper investigation, it is quite clear, as to where the needle of suspicion (by any logical conclusion) is pointed to. Also a point in this connection is that way back in 2004 one Mr. Kalyan Banerjee who was residing in the ground floor of premises 2 B, Srinath Das Lane, for decades, was brutaly beaten and removed out of that portion. At that instance the petitioner of this burglary case was viewing the event fron her balcony. Mr.Neelkamal who was one amount the people who was engaged in FORCEFULLY REMOVING Mr. Kolyan Banerjee pointed out me and told to Mr. Souradipta Banerjee one more person to be removed from this house. When I called to Mr. Souradipta Banerjee to kwno wny he did not protest for this offensive threat on me by Mr.Neelkamal, he denied telling me any detail and calmed me down.

4) Strangely enough part recovery of stolen article was made through a local person (who puts ficticious and concacted story) that those valuables are left back by a fleeing thiefand a so-called arrest of a stranger who has nothing to do with the commission of the said criminal offences clearly establisfes the fact that the Investigating Agency, here the concerned officials of Bowbazar Police Station, are well aware of the identity of the real brain behind the scene � some sophisticated brain, which is well aware of the timing and duration of entry/exit of the owners and their authorised persons of the said �MOOKERJEE HOUSE� and was on the look-out for the deeds and documents � perhaps looking for some legal avenue by which such properties could somehow be claimed by some or the other provisions of law. During my visit to Bowbazar PS on Feb 11th 2010, along with oue Fmily friend Mr. Ramachandran, the OC told I�m a lessee and not the owner and then corrected that I�m a beneficiery of a Trust and the also told me the names of the trustee and their occupation and address, and said tht he has a copy and also was literally searching for the same in his desk (not in Police case File) and added that these details were supplied by Mr. Sourendranath Banerjee of 2 B, Srinath Das Lane and he was also given a copy of the Trust Deed, which is a private document between the Trust Creator, Trustee and the Beneficiary and none else. It is surprising to see the reckless and casual attitude of OC who does net get even an iota of doubt on finding a private Trust Deed with the suspects of the victim, inspite of the fact that �LEGAL PAPERS WERE MISSING� and demanding �PROTECTION TO LIFE AND PROPERTY� in all my three complaint letters. With what moto the OC took a copy of our trust deed in his hands was revealed by his personal visit to one of the trustees residence which is situated in Hedwa Park outside Bowbazar Police Juridisdiction and also visited to his office at C. R. Avenue within same day. Are they policing for the Burglary or for the culprits whose target is to remove me out of my house forcefully ? If they had any doubt as to the my onus of themissing articles I claimed, they should have taken this step as their first step of investigation.

5) In the year 2005, during Durga Puja, the local Puja committee (Bowbazar Friends� Society) had in most illegal manner constructed the Pandel which ILLEGALLY blocked the entrance/passage to our said property against which I moved various applications with the Police authorities and also moved Court of Law, for necessary reliefs (Sec. 144 ) for which I became unpopular in the locality. Keeping this fact in mind and knowing fully well that in case of any problem I would be left all alone, someone who knew those facts along with the existance of antique, curio, valuable jewellery and other articles in the said �MOOKERJEE HOUSE� and he/she who was in illusion of finding some scope to become heiress/heir of Late Mookerjee had very meticulously and deeply rooted criminal conspicracy had planned commission of theft and burglary in most sophisticated manner and with the local police authorities providing total shelter to such person.

COMPLAINT OF MIS-DIRECTED INVESTIGATION to shield the actual culprit :

Though by logical conclusion, it is quite clear that the above mentioned Burglaries and theft could not be committed in any manner whatsoever despite criminal conspicracy and abettment of some of the residents of either the premises No 2/1, Srinath Das Lane or Premises No. 2 B, Srinath Das Lane, both Bowbazar Police station, Kolkata 700 012., despite per (small and neglible) part recovery of valuables stolen property.

The Police force, by Purposely Mis-directed Investigation is unnecessarily protecting the actual culprits/master-mind, who could perhaps, only be from the said adjoining properties and none-else. Despite such effective clues, it is highly strange as to why the long arms of law had not yet reached the actual offenders or the concerned offenders have managed the law enforcing agency as the lackadestical attitude of the Police force is inferred.

Yours truly,

Mrs. Manju Mookerjee Sridhar
___________________________________________________________________________

ATTACHMENT - 4
From: s sridhar
Subject: Letter from NHRC Case No.640/25/5/2010/oc/sb-2
To: cp@kolkatapolice.gov.in
Cc: grievance@kolkatapolice.gov.in
Date: Sunday, October 3, 2010, 7:44 PM
Respected Sir,

A letter from Assistant Registrar (LAW), nNHRC, Faridkot, Newdelhi Ref No. 640/25/5/2010/OC/SB-2 dated August 23rd 2010 is sent to you under copy to me.

As it is more than 40 days of this letter, I beg yourself to inform me the action taken and status of the complaint at your end.

Any communication to me in this regard may please be sent to me through this email address or registered post to my below address.

Yours truly,

S. Sridhar
'MOOKERJEE HOUSE'
2 A, Srinath Das Lane,
Bowbazar,
Kolkata 700012.
__________________________________________________________________________________

ATTACHMENT � 5
RESPONSE TIME FOR GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL BY PG DEPT KOLKATA POLICE - REG. Sunday, October 3, 2010 3:04 PM
From:

Dated : October 2nd 2010.

To
Shri. Banibrata Basu
Special Commissioner of Police- II
Kolkata Police.

Respected Sir,

Sub : RESPONSE TIME OF PUBLIC GRIEVACNE DEPT OF KOLKATA POLICE
Ref ; DIAL 100 episode dated October 2nd 2010 in DD Bangla

I was one of the viewer of your refered program and also a complainant to your Public Gievance Department.
Sir, in the program you have assured tha the PG department will promptly solve the complaint received by it within 7 to 10 days.
My complaint to PG dated Feb 26th 2010 is still unsolved. It is more than 7 months now.
My complaint against OC, BOWBAZAR PS is registration no is 868/03/P.G CELL/10. This complaint registration is conveyed to me by the department letter dated March 9th 2010 vide their Memo No. 4753/P.G.Cell clearly mentioning our complaint letter dated Feb 26th 2010.

So, Please confirm if what I heared in your program is �7 TO 10 DAYS� OF �SEVEN TO TEN MONTHS�
A copy of my complaint can bew obtained fron you PG department.

As even SEVEN MONTH time is over, please reply me as to when can i expect redressal to my complaint.

Yours truthfully,

Mr. S. Sridhar,
�MOOKERJEE HOUSE�
2 A, Srinath Das Lane,
Bowbazar,
Kolkata 700012.

ATTACHMENT � 6
http://thestatesman.net/index.php?op...36740&catid=72
WC Bonnerjee descendant accuses cops of burglary
1 August 2010
Rajib Chakraborty
KOLKATA, 1 AUG: Mrs Manju Mookerjee, a descendant of Womesh Chandra Bonnerjee, the first president of the Indian National Congress, has accused officers at Bowbazar police station for stealing antiques and other valuable items from her ancestral house (see photo) in a burglary committed on August 2009.
Gold and silver medals of her father, Dr Surapriya Mookerjee, gold pocket watches, gold spectacles, centuries old diamond stud rings, ear studs, Victorian silver coins and a watch, a pen and shawls used by WC Bonnerjee were stolen. The house was burgled thrice and theft of legal papers and documents was also attemped.
Mrs Mookerjee, a homoeopathic doctor, alleged that the police despite finding the items, did not return them. She was verbally abused several times by senior police officials of Kolkata Police whenever she visited them to lodge complaints. Apprehensive of a �conspiracy� against her, she would soon be appealing for a CBI investigation. She also blamed officers of the Bowbazar police station for their "callous approach" towards the incident, adding that she went to Lalbazar and demanded an inquiry by the anti-burglary wing of the detective department and other senior officials, but her appeal was ignored.
After several days, an officer from the Bowbazar police station informed her that the stolen items had been found. She was told to come to the police station to identify them. After identification, she was promised that the items would be handed over to her soon. But when she went to take them back, she found that most of the originally shown items to be missing, with some of them being replaced with counterfeit ones.
On refusing to accept them, a senior officer at the station allegedly misbehaved with her and forced her to sign an acknowledgement receipt. She suspects that the police are in cahoots with the culprits and that they are trying to cheat her off the original items. Mr B Mukhopadhyay, OC of the Bowbazar police station claimed that they recovered many stolen items and handed those to her adding that they are trying to recover the rest of the items.
Comments (0)

ATTACHMENT � 7

From: Shri G M Chakrabarti, IPS
Subject: Re: Reply regarding complaint bearing P G Cell Registration No. 868/03/P.G.Cell/10.
To: "s sridhar"
Date: Friday, October 8, 2010, 10:48 AM
This to acknowledge your mail dated 08/10/2010 addressed to Commissioner of Police, Kolkata.

OC Computer Cell, KPD

----- Original Message -----
From: s sridhar
Date: Friday, October 8, 2010 2:20 am
Subject: Re: Reply regarding complaint bearing P G Cell Registration No. 868/03/P.G.Cell/10.
To: "Shri G M Chakrabarti, IPS"
Cc: Public Grievance Cell , "Shri Bani Brata Basu, IPS" , HOBACKOL , satya@newmediacomm.biz
Dear Sir,

I appreciate the DELAYED but prompt response to my grievance complaint dated Feb 26thAS EARLY AS October 6th. This itselves shows that ANY ENQUIRY, TRUE TO THE SPIRIT OF THE WORD is not conducted atall. Else I would not have been denied the status / report of the same and I unnecessarily harassed and pushed to take RTI channel to seek information and facts, where again Kolkata Police is a habitual failure.
The propaganda what the Spl. Commissioner of Kolkata Police to boost the image of kolkata Police via DD Bangla in DIAL 100 is a mere media gimmick. He promises to solve any grievance within 7 to 10 days, whereas in reality within such time even the registration of the grievance does not happen, leave alone the TRUTHFULNESS of the REDRESSAL ASPECT.
If so my RTI application seeking information during April 2010 and the my letter to Appellate Authority on June 2010 could have been well answered by your department without inviting letter to appellate authority or fine under RTI. Also the reply, shall otherwise, could have reached me within March 2010.
Any enquiry on an event of crime on a Police Officer has to be done in the OFFICIALS of their own department IN ABSENCE OF THE COMPLAINANT and they are certified SCOT-FREE. This is unfair and unacceptable INTERNAL DRAMA, atleast to any citizen of this Great Country and with basic common sense. By this way the P G Cell wants to issue CLEAN-CHIT CERTIFICATE to their OFFICIALS? Under which court of law this one sided hearing and judgement holds valid ? Can the PG Department show the vediography of the event of its ENQUIRY it had with the Mr. Buddhadev Mukhopadhyay, the OC of Bowbazar PS and other officials.

What is the stand of Kolkata Police on the third event of crime done to us by tresspassing our private property through the window passage on the ground floor of 2 B, Srinath Das Lane, in which the Investigation Officer NEVER visited the PLACE OF OFFENCE and also DONE FTR !!!

Please send me an attested photocopy of the detailed enquiry report done by your department in this regard at the earliest.

As a transparent department under the State Law agency, I require Kolkata Police to oblige to my request without making any deviation, exception, exemption, negative reply, etc.,or harassing me any further in any way which may lead me again to RTI channel on which Kolkata Police is a proven failure. . Also please reply for the non-contextual reply sent by your department in this regard.
Non optical recording of articles deposited by a good samaritan, valuing the same in a petty fancy jewel shop situated under a different PS jurisdiction on the same day of such deposit even before the same is claimed/tagged under any case, non-disclosure of the deposited articles for three days inspite of proper description and repeated visits by us, calling us to identify the articles without prior intimation, non issuance of Identification Report, absence of non optical documentation, new articles included, show articles removed, fabrication of shown articles, etc., inclusion and removal of articles from what was shown to us at the time of identification vis-a-vis at the time of handover and non optical documentation thereof, PURPOSEFUL delay in sending SEIZURE report to The Magistrate inspite of persistent follow-ups.

The mass public know about the corruptions and anti-civilian activities of Police world-wide and these incidents prove that Kolkata Police and even the PG Cell is no exception in cracking the nexus between the Owners/residents of 2 B, srinath Das Lane and the Local Thana - Bowbazar Police station over a simple case of door breaking, trespassing, damaging and ransaking whole house and looting the priceless valuables just from behind the roof top door on pretext of Puja Pandal erection.

If the allegations leveled by us could not be substantiated at your level, allow us to interrogate the officials of Bowbazar PS and obtain justice in a more scientific, logical and TRANSPARENT WAY wherein the whole media can be witness.

If Kolkata Police claims to be TRANSPARENT, this option should be given to us of it should refer this case to CBI Inquiry not only for the INTENSITY of CORRUPTION involved, but also to Prove your Bowbazar PS officials TRUTHFUL. Also this is indispensable for the OC challenged that if possible you can go for CBI Investigation.
Mr. S.Sridhar,
'Mookerjee House',
2A, Srinath Das Lane, Bowbazar,
Kolkata-700012.

--- On Wed, 10/6/10, Public Grievance Cell wrote:

From: Public Grievance Cell
Subject: Reply regarding complaint bearing P G Cell Registration No. 868/03/P.G.Cell/10.
To: seek4sridhar@yahoo.com
Date: Wednesday, October 6, 2010, 12:20 PM
To
Mr. S.Sridhar,
'Mookerjee House',
2A, Srinath Das Lane, Bowbazar,
Kolkata-700012.

With reference to your complaint dated February 26, 2010 this is to inform you that a detailed enquiry has been conducted and the allegations levelled against the police personnel of Bowbazar P.S. Kolkata Police could not be substantiated in course of the said enquiry.

Special Commissioner of Police (II)
Kolkata
________________________________________________________________________________

ATTACHMENT � 8

Dated October 8th, 2010.

Respected Commissioner Sir,

Sub : NOC sanctioned by Kolkata Police to Bowbazar Friends Society (BFS)for Durga Puja Pandal
A well planned crime of house breaking and burglary is committed keeping Durga Puja Pandal by BFS as the centre object during 2009 Puja and nexus of Local PS is clearly visible.
Repeated communication is served to the verious officials of your department which proved vain. Please go through the following letter sent to your department including your official email id.
Please solve the issue, as committed by you during our visit to you at your chamber in Lalbazar on August 31st 2009 when you assured to us, �WE WILL TAKE UP THIS CASE�. This year alzo the BSF had erected Pandal at a diffferent place which proves the criminal intention and involvements.
Please address and solve this issue in your program DIAL 100 this episode dated October 9th 2010
With truth and only truth,

Mr. S. Sridhar and Dr. (Mrs.) Manju Mookerjee Sridhar (descendant of Shir. Womesh Chandra Bonnerjee, The first President of Indian national Congress, 1885)
�MOOKERJEE HOSUE�
2 A, Srinath Das Lane, Bowbazar,
Kolkata 700012.

Sir,

In connection with the forwarded email, Subject : PETITION REGARDING THREAT TO OUR LIFE & PROPERTY POSED BY BOWBAZAR FRIENDS� SOCIETY (BFS) and others,
We wish to reiterate that the ourstery of shift
TILL 1995 17 SRINATH DAS LANE
FROM 1996 TO 2005 2 A SRINATH DAS LANE
2006 TO 2008 17 SRINATH DAS LANE
2009 2 A SRINATH DAS LANE
2010 17 SRINATH DAS LANE

We have put up our petition with facts, logics, rationale, scientific reasoning and common sense to the investigating authority (Kolkata Police) and escalated the same to the controlling authorities (commissioner of Police, Home Political Department(Police), chief Minister of West Bengal) numerous times and exhausted all avenues to justice available to us. A simple methodology of door breaking adopted by our neighbour to burgle out all the valuables form our house could never take more than a few hours.

The dedicated mentality of �non-cooperation� and �inaction� by the authorities points the involvement, either active of passive, interest to safeguard the real criminals.
In-spite of eminent skills and expertise Kolkata Police never intend to take to the BRASS TACKS.

A state run agency who�s charter is framed by constitution of India and who�s prime duty is to protect law and order and who is considered �GUARDIAN OF LAW�, violating the same based on manifold layers of corruption, favourism, partiality, disorientation, immoral attitude towards discharge of legitimate duty, dishonesty, non transparency in functioning, unethical behaviour, misuse of power and influence, indifferent and harassing attitude, disobedience to legal commitments, coercive approach, violation of basic human rights, hiding and safeguarding the identity of a criminal - all these exposes that they are more cruel elements than the real criminal. Inconsistency between the reply of SPIO, Kolkata Police, obtained against our RTI Application and the words of D. C. Central in the meeting with us on June 26th 2010 were contradicting, which proves acute protocol issue between the cadres of Kolkata Police and non conformance to a standards, and discloses HIDE-AND-SEEK attitude at local PS level and concealment of factual transactions between the local PS and its reporting authority. OC of Bowbazar PS had arrested a person of different district which is nearly 100 kilometres of distance of our house IN CONNECTION WITH A TRESSPASS CRIME COMMITTED BY OUR NEIGHBOUR AT 2 B, SRINATH DAS LANE, KOLKATA 700012, done judicial procedure and retained him in police custody and released, and the FTR of the case done without even a single communication tome the complainant or even without keeping the DC posted. While the first and Second case are still unsolved and no action initiated the third one which has clear evidence of criminal trespass is closed SILENTLY, thus hiding the real culprit. THE SURPISE IS THAT THE IO OF THE THIRD CASE NEVER VISITED THE PO. WHILE THE DC TOLD US ON JUNE 26 2010 THAT WEE WILL BE INFORMED OF ANY ARREST IN OUR CASE THE OC CLOSED THE CASE KEEPING US IN THE DARK. WHO IS RIGHT ? DC OR THE OC? While our suspect is �NEIGHBOUR� who done the crime by removing the MAKE SHIFT iron rods of his window in the ground floor of his house, namely 2 B, Srinath Das Lane, facing our private court yard, on what ground of suspicion did the local PS arrested a totally unconnected person ? The trespass drama show the clear involvement of not only the owners of premises 2 B, Srinath Das Lane but also the OC who SAFEGUARDED the interest of the criminal. Even the complaint to Honourable Commissioner of Police regarding the incident of open oral threat made by Mr. Soradipta Banerjee of 2 B, Srinath Das Lane to me from his mobile phone on May 1st 2010, which evoked a session of interrogation by Mr. Sil of PG department not with the accused in our presence, but with us who are victims, is yet to report on the result of the interrogation. When we repeatedly asked, Mr. Sil told that he will reply to CP and not to us. Three months now, we did not receive any communication neither from PG Dept. Or CP.
A case in this point which happened long back is that the occupant of ground floor of 2 B, Srinath Das Lane, Mr. Kalyan Banerjee, aged around 60, was driven out by use of muscle power by appointing the members of BFS in a midnight when he was alone in his house and when one of the person form the gang Neelkamal told pointing me ( We was witnessing the incident from our balcony) told to Mr. Souradipta Banerjee, �ONE MORE PERSON IS THERE TO BE THROWN OUT OF OUR PARA�.
Another case in this point is that the members of BFS made demeaning, damaging and insulting negative propaganda of me in the para over microphone posing me as a person against the Durga puja Celebration and also made communal comment on our husband that he is a MUSLIM. We ignored these nonsense measures as we were not mean minded to react to each every shouts on the street, which they had taken as their advantage and targeted our house when we were not there. Also Ms. Shampa Banerjee w/o Mr. Souradipta Banerjee kept asking our husband whenever he visited our house, �WHEN WILL MANJU RETURN� which punctuates the planning the timing of the cirme. Also Mr. Souradipta Banerjee told over phone that, We had mentioned the name of his mother Ms. Shampa Banerjee as accused in our burglary case which is not a fact. How can a person voluntarily include the name of his own mother in a burglary case while we never pointed any individual�s name as suspect of accused?
Lack of dedication in protecting the public interest and ensuring public security and inaction towards law breakers both within the Kolkata Police Force and in public should not be tolerated by a dutiful CP.
Email to CP is an official communication by those who are in need of special care. �WE CARE� is the slogan of Kolkata Police while the state of affairs prove that they �DO NOT CARE�

Any email to CP@kolkatapolice.gov is promptly answered by AUTO REPLY method which binds the Kolkata Police in taking cognizance of the matter reported and assure to protect and ensure the safety to the life and property of the complainant.

While the Kolkata Police is manager by eminent functionaries and officers of IPS rank, we naturally expect its onus to reply for a complaint mail of letter and take prompt solution without scope for any reminders of escalations. There is lack of basic answerability, accountability, responsibility.

While our attached email shows our prompt information to KP that not to issue NOC to BFS as its members namely, Mr. Chandan Ghosh, Neelkamal, Puti, Dhokdhoki, Shankar are directly or indirectly involved in the crime and that there is criminal conspiracy and nexus between the Kolkata Police Force and the BFS in the way they made the timing and placing the Puja Pandal in front of our house without even leaving legally stipulated 4 foot free space and the OC who inspected the side did not took cognizance of the illegal violation, and NOW it proves beyond doubt our suspect on the BFS by the SHIFT of Puja pandal form the place they erected it last year and this year. Last year they erected in front of our house which is not the usual place for puja and over one month in advance they erected the puja which is the main �ACTIVITY� in clout of which the crime of burglary is committed. The involvement of OC, Mr. Buddhadev Mukhopadhyay is established beyond doubt by his act of putting hand on shoulder on one of our suspect Mr. Chandan Ghosh of BFS and a resident of 1/1, Srinath Das Lane, Bowbazar, when he came for investigating the Place of Crime. The OC was very cheerful while talking with Mr. Chandan and both of them went walking putting hand on each other�s shoulder to Nirmal Chandra Street and had some �SECRET SETTLEMENT�. THE OC INSTRUCTED US �NOT TO DO ANYTHING IN PO, WE WILL ARRANGE FORENSIC INVESTIGATION� AND THE PURPOSE OF SUCH INSTRUCTION CAME TO LIGHT BY WAY OF A SHOCKING FRESH SECOND EVENT OF CRIME IN THE SAME PATH AND ROUTE USED BY THE CRIMINALS AS IN THE FIRST CASE, WITHIN TWO DAYS OF VISIT BY VISIT OF OFFICIALS OF PC AND THE SAME THING SHWICH THE OC NOTED LYING IN THE PO BE LOOTED. Later at the time of taking part of stolen articles over court bond, Mr Buddhadev Mukhopadhyay shouted on us voluntarily that HE WILL NOT DO ANYTHING AGAINST THE OFFICIALS OF BFS COME WHAT MAY, AT THE COST OF OUR JOB , YOU CAN GOT O YOUR COMMISSIONER AND ASK ME TO TRANSFER OR ARRANGE FRO CBI INQUIRY IF YOU CAN. HOW CAN A OC OF PS CAN TALK IN SUCH ARROGANT AND UNOFFICIAL WORDS ON COMMISSIONER OF POLICE. IS HE SUPERIOR TO CP ? This shows his open disposition exhibiting his LINKS with the criminal of the burglary.
We request the Honourable commissioner of Kolkata Police to withdraw the NOC to BFS FORTHWITH and initiate a fresh and true investigation by a special team who were never involved in our case so far and give justice.

Sir, this task of CLEANING OFF the unscrupulous elements within your force can be done by you alone.
Please give justice to us or sentence us to death for asking justice.

With truth and only truth,

Mr. S. Sridhar and Dr. (Mrs.) Manju Mookerjee Sridhar (descendant of Shir. Womesh Chandra Bonnerjee, The first President of Indian national Congress, 1885)
�MOOKERJEE HOSUE�
2 A, Srinath Das Lane, Bowbazar,
Kolkata 700012.

Attached Thumbnails

Attached Files