| File | Date | Downloads |
|---|---|---|
| VOLUMINOUS NO GROUND TO DENY INFORMATION : The information denied to the petitioner by PIO only on the ground that the information sought is quite bulky. Hon'ble High Court has held that there is no justification to deny the information on thi ... | 12-22-2011 | 113 |
| issue of answer-sheets no longer res integra : The Hon'ble High Court has held that the matter of answer-sheets is no longer res-integra as it stands settled by virtue of the law laid down in a judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal ... | 12-22-2011 | 21 |
| all co-operatives under RTI Act provisions : Hon'ble High Court of Punjab and Haryana have held that in view of the judgment of this Court in Hindu Urban Co-operative Bank Limited V/s State Information Commission and others, 2011(2), RCR (Civil) ... | 12-22-2011 | 43 |
| FAA directed to dispose off FA in 2 weeks : The First Appeal not decided in 45 days, the Appellate . Hon'ble HC directed Appellate Authority to decide the first appeal within a period of two weeks from the date of receiving a copy of the Order ... | 12-22-2011 | 25 |
| file application for compliance report : Information Commissioner has merely directed the SPIO-cum- Deputy District Education Officer, Sonipat to trace the relevant documents and furnish information on all relevant points to the petitioner. ... | 12-22-2011 | 27 |
| no repeated information to different members of sa : Since the information sought by petitioner No.1 as a member of Gram Panchayat under the Right to Information Act had already been supplied to petitioner No.2 and other member of the Gram Panchayat by ... | 12-22-2011 | 15 |
| PENALTY SET ASIDE AS NO MALA FIDE RECORDED : State Information Commission has no where held that the petitioner withheld any information deliberately or willfully. Non-furnishing of satisfactory explanation would not ipso-facto mean that the pet ... | 12-22-2011 | 25 |
| Supreme court clarification on Section 18 and Sect : this judgment has put to rest many controversies . The salient features as I understand are the following : Citizen versus Person . S.6 has a scope wider than s.3 [ very important]. that means even ... | 12-22-2011 | 81 |
| Ext Affairs Min to disclose EA Minister's UK Trip : The CIC accepted the plea that the record of discussions of the Foreign Ministers with various people of different countries would cover a wide range of topics and all of these could not be disclosed ... | 12-30-2011 | 57 |
| Chandigarh DCDRF-1 - Kalra Vs PFC : Chandigarh DCDRF-1 - Kalra Vs PFC | 09-03-2012 | 21 |
| Compensation Paid FA 213 of 2012 : Compensation Paid FA 213 of 2012 | 09-04-2012 | 29 |
| DCDRF BANLOR II : DCDRF BANLOR II | 09-04-2012 | 13 |
| DCDRF Chd II SK Mishra vs PIO PSIC 4-5-2012 : DCDRF Chd II SK Mishra vs PIO PSIC 4-5-2012 | 09-04-2012 | 16 |
| DCDRF DRIPURAM BANGALORE 30-11-2011 : DCDRF DRIPURAM BANGALORE 30-11-2011 | 09-04-2012 | 9 |
| DCDRF FARIDKOT : DCDRF FARIDKOT | 09-04-2012 | 10 |
| DCDRF Ludhiana 09-11-2011 Sanjeev Malhotra vs DC L : DCDRF Ludhiana 09-11-2011 Sanjeev Malhotra vs DC Ludhiana and ors | 09-04-2012 | 9 |
| DCDRF MANDI : DCDRF MANDI | 09-04-2012 | 11 |
| DCDRF Medak : DCDRF Medak | 09-04-2012 | 11 |
| DCDRF Mohali -2 Balraj Kalra vs Rural Development : DCDRF Mohali -2 Balraj Kalra vs Rural Development | 09-04-2012 | 11 |
| DCDRF MOHALI BALRAJ SINGH VS APIO DIRECTOR RURAL D : DCDRF MOHALI BALRAJ SINGH VS APIO DIRECTOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND PANCHAYAT AND ORS 10-2-2012 | 09-04-2012 | 18 |
| DCDRF Mohali GMADA : DCDRF Mohali GMADA | 09-04-2012 | 11 |
| DCDRF naupada : DCDRF naupada | 09-04-2012 | 12 |
| DCDRF NIZAMABAD : DCDRF NIZAMABAD | 09-04-2012 | 9 |
| DCDRF PUNE COM 16K : DCDRF PUNE COM 16K | 09-04-2012 | 15 |
| DCDRF SOUTH MUMBAI : DCDRF SOUTH MUMBAI | 09-04-2012 | 12 |
| DCDRF TUTICORIN : DCDRF TUTICORIN | 09-04-2012 | 12 |
| DCDRF TUTICORIN 2 : DCDRF TUTICORIN 2 | 09-04-2012 | 20 |
| DCDRF VIZIANAGARAM 2 : DCDRF VIZIANAGARAM 2 | 09-04-2012 | 17 |
| DCDRF VIZIANAGRAM 1 : DCDRF VIZIANAGRAM 1 | 09-04-2012 | 17 |
| DECISION OF CONSUMER FORA CHENNAI : DECISION OF CONSUMER FORA CHENNAI | 09-04-2012 | 54 |
| NCDRC SP thirumalarao : NCDRC SP thirumalarao | 09-04-2012 | 24 |
| NCDRC usha Rani Aggarwal : NCDRC usha Rani Aggarwal | 09-04-2012 | 62 |
| NCRDC RTI applicant not consumer RP 4061 2010 : NCRDC RTI applicant not consumer RP 4061 2010 | 09-04-2012 | 51 |
| Punjab State Consumer Commission considers RTI App : Punjab State Consumer Commission considers RTI Applicant a Consumer | 09-04-2012 | 54 |
| RTI 1st Addl. DCDRF bangalore : RTI 1st Addl. DCDRF bangalore | 09-04-2012 | 41 |
| TNSCDRC Order on RTI : TNSCDRC Order on RTI | 09-04-2012 | 108 |