loveysingh
Can't Break the Silence

Clearly mention in your first appeal, that it is a Life or Liberty case.

This portal is only meant for discussing issues related to the RTI Act 2005. You can read some of the threads whose links are given just below your post.

Yes, that addendum looks OK. Go ahead.

The full decision of Punjab SIC is available here: http://www.rtiindia.org/forum/110621-dayanand-medical-college-hospital-ludhiana-public-authority-within-ambit-section-2-h-rti-act.html

Please also read this full thread: http://www.rtiindia.org/forum/95178-rti-happenings-now-dmch-under-info-panel-scrutiny.html

The limit for RTI application to public authorities under Central Government is 500 words. But no application will be rejected solely on the grounds that it is more than 500 words. Your RTI application has to be as per the RTI Rules for the Centre. These are available in the Guide section of...

Please do not start multiple threads on the same topic/subject. Just from your above post, it is impossible to link the whole story together ! How do you expect someone to guide you with those sketchy details ? Continue in the same thread started earlier by you. This thread is closed.

1. If you have the Tamil version of the RTI Act, please upload it here. That other file is being removed. It was taken from the DoPT website. 2. It has not happened.

1. Use the AK Bhawan address. The inward department of the CIC shifted from the old JNU campus a long time ago. 2. If you objective is to get the CIC to direct disclosure of information, then only file a second appeal. If you file a complaint, then as per the SC judgment, CIC has no powers to...

Do not file a complaint with CIC. This is because after the SC judgment on Sec 18, CIC has no powers to order disclosure of information while deciding a Complaint under Sec 18. Therefore, if your motive is to get information, then file a Second Appeal under Sec 19 only. On the other hand, if your...

Go ahead and file first appeal. In remarks, (read 1d in post # 8 above), state "misleading" information provided by PIO. There is no point filing another RTI application. Just go for addendum to first appeal.

You seem to already "know" most of the information ! The other type of information is mainly about the status of a building by private party. Since RTI is not applicable to private entities....you cannot file a RTI application directly with them. Under RTI you can only get information from...

Two threads merged.

Use both the routes: 1. Direct RTI with IBPS. Let them clarify what is the situation and then take it forward from there. 2. RTI to the Bank on whose behalf IBPS conducted the exam and for which you appeared. Read some of the threads in the following search results: ...

1. Yes you can file an addendum to the first appeal. The addendum is the same as the first appeal but brings to the FAAs notice the additional fact that you have now received a reply from the PIO. In the addendum, clearly show how and why you are not satisfied with the PIOs reply. Make 4 columns: ...

It depends on what are the exact details you are seeking. Remember that under RTI, there is no restriction on any applicant to ask for any information. However, there is no obligation on the PIO to provide you information exempted under Sec 8 or 9.

That simply means - can be or cannot be a legal practitioner.

The PIO will be PIO of the CMs office. Please read some of the search results here: https://www.google.co.in/search?q=maharshtra+chief+minister+salary&aq=f&oq=maharshtra+chief+minister+salary&aqs=chrome.0.57j0.7121j0&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

Just address it to: The Public Information Officer (PIO) under RTI Act 2005 Office of the .................. ......................... ................ (address)

Why has the Hon'ble CIC forgotten Sec 4(1)(b)(xi): xi. the budget allocated to each of its agency, indicating the particulars of all plans, proposed expenditures and reports on disbursements made; All information sought by the appellant in this case falls under Sec 4(1)(b)(xi). Why didn't the...

How can the SPIO deny such information to you ? He is supposed to maintain that information and provide a quarterly report to the SIC - so that SIC can compile its annual report ! Please read Sec 25 of the RTI Act. A part is reproduced below for your benefit: 1. The Central Information...

In AP lawyers are allowed. Please read Sec 7(4) of the AP appeal procedure rules (GO 66): :: Andhra Pradesh Information Commission ::

This portal is only dedicated to discussing issues related to the RTI Act 2005. You will not get any answers here to general doubts and requests for help in non RTI related matters.

This portal is only dedicated to discussing issues related to the RTI Act 2005. You will not get any answers here to general doubts and requests for help in non RTI related matters.

It depends on what is the type of information you are seeking ? Once you have a list of the information you are seeking, then you can decide as to whom to send the RTI application to.

SGPC is under RTI. Please read: ...

First check their salary details (already available on the Internet) - maybe they get a fixed amount for petrol expenses. "Politicians in Maharashtra" is a very vague and broad term. Better to try and concentrate on one category - like Ministers OR MLAs OR MLCs...etc.

This portal is only dedicated to discussing issues related to the RTI Act 2005. You will not get any answers here to general doubts and requests for help in non RTI related matters.