• karira's Avatar
    1 Day Ago
    1. NO. Only the applicant can inspect and can be assisted by someone during inspection. Inspection by someone else using a authorisation letter is not allowed. 2. It is generally Rs 2.00 per page. But check the additional fees payable under the RTI rules of the state under which the University falls. These are available in our guide section: Guide 3. Once the PIO informas you about the inspection, he will also inform you the date / time / venue for the same. Inspection is also "information" and has to be provided/facilitated within the same 30 days mandated time limit. 4. Yes, if "inspection" is delayed by more than a month, it is considered as delayed information and you can file first appeal. Give adequate allowance for postal delays, while calculating 30 days period. 5. You can write to the PIO requesting for extension of time till March. Or simply wait till you come back and refile a fresh RTI application. 6. You can file the first appeal from anywhere, but it should be by the same applicant and also from the same address as the RTI application. For fees for first appeal, see the RTI Rules for that state under which the university falls....link is in the Guide section : Guide
    9 replies | 211 view(s)
  • karira's Avatar
    2 Days Ago
    The news article is available on our portal here: http://www.rtiindia.org/forum/133742-ap-hc-suspends-rti-chief-s-order.html
    10 replies | 174 view(s)
  • karira's Avatar
    2 Days Ago
    Well, appellants have to cite that CIC order and refuse to accept the jurisdiction of SICs for matters related to HCs. There is a vested interest in the part of the SICs and HCs to keep the matters under the SICs jurisdiction.
    10 replies | 174 view(s)
  • karira's Avatar
    2 Days Ago
    1. PIO will produce the records / files for your inspection. 2. There is no time limit. Charges are applicable after one hour of free inspection. If you do not finish inspection in one sitting, you can tell the PIO that you are coming back next day to continue the inspection.
    18 replies | 376 view(s)
  • karira's Avatar
    2 Days Ago
    The CIC has already ruled that ONLY CIC has jurisdiction over HCs. This decision was based on a reference of the Madras High Court to decide the preliminary matter of "jurisdiction" in my case: http://www.rtiindia.org/forum/45738-complaints-against-supreme-court-variopus-high-courts-post320704.html#post320704
    10 replies | 174 view(s)
  • karira's Avatar
    2 Days Ago
    karira replied to a thread Ugc recognization in Non RTI Issues
    You can check on the UGC / AICTE / DEC websites. All the information is available there.
    4 replies | 77 view(s)
  • karira's Avatar
    2 Days Ago
    This thread is very old. The last post in this thread was in Oct 2009 !
    12 replies | 4543 view(s)
  • karira's Avatar
    4 Days Ago
    All threads started by the same poster on the same topic/subject - merged into a single thread.
    14 replies | 473 view(s)
  • karira's Avatar
    4 Days Ago
    Some of the Sec 4(1)(b) disclosures of Banks are laughable (can go into Khushwant Singh joke book) ! Take a look at State Bank of Mysore: Right To Information Act 2005 I tried to get several banks to implement Sec 4(1)(b) and went all the way to the CIC - where 4 of my related case files were simply lost !
    9 replies | 231 view(s)
  • karira's Avatar
    4 Days Ago
    karira replied to a thread CPIO under CBDT in Ask for RTI Query
    Check here: Department Information
    5 replies | 135 view(s)
  • karira's Avatar
    4 Days Ago
    karira replied to a thread CPIO under CBDT in Ask for RTI Query
    Those are ONLY CPIOs for the HR department !
    5 replies | 135 view(s)
  • karira's Avatar
    4 Days Ago
    No harm should come to RTI activist: HC Sounding out a warning that no harm should come to RTI activist, K Ravikumar, who has taken on a sitting minister, the High Court on Monday said it would not remain silent if anything untoward happened to him. The court's stern message came after it was informed that Ravikumar, who has filed a case against alleged political appointments to the Kanakapura Planning Authority, had been arrested. After his advocate withdrew from the case, he had argued the case himself and the case had been posted for further hearing to Monday. However, he failed to turn up. Another advocate, GR Mohan, told the court that Ravikumar was supposed to meet him and sign the power of attorney so that he could conduct the case for him. But before Ravikumar could do that, he was arrested in another case. The RTI activist had challenged the appointments of MD Vijayadev, K Puttamade Gowda, Joseph Gonzalves and A Ramesh on the grounds that they were made at the behest of a minister and did not conform to the appointment norms. Ravikumar's petition also alleged there were criminal cases against the appointees. In an earlier hearing on December 4, the court had ordered the urban development ministry to file an affidavit on the credentials of Vijayadev and other respon-dents in carrying out development work at the local level. The ministry was also asked to find out if respondents 2 to 5 and their family members had any cases pending against them. Ravikumar, in his petition, had said there were encroachment cases against the family member of one of the appointees and also those named in the petition did not have the experience to run a planning authority. On December 10, the court order in the case, said, "Additional Government Advocate MI Arun submits that, on preliminary inquiry, there is some material over criminal prosecution against the mother of respondent no. 2." The advocate also sought time to verify the issue of gomal land in Survey No.421 of Maralebekuppe Village, Uyyamballi Hobli, Kanakapura Taluk, said to have been usurped by the mother of respondent no. 2. Read More: No harm should come to RTI activist: HC - Bangalore Mirror
    0 replies | 75 view(s)
  • karira's Avatar
    5 Days Ago
    Thread shifted to "Success Stories" section.
    6 replies | 330 view(s)
  • karira's Avatar
    5 Days Ago
    Your first appeal is absolutely correct and so are the grounds. Go ahead and argue on the same lines during the first appeal. Chances of getting a favorable order increase dramatically if you attend the first appeal hearing in person. So, it is better that you attend.
    8 replies | 244 view(s)
  • karira's Avatar
    5 Days Ago
    Dear all,On 5th December, 2014, the Delhi High Court ruled recognising the right of a public authority to challenge a decision of its own Public Information Officer/First Appellate Authority before the Central Information Commission. With the deepest respect to the wisdom of the Hon'ble Court, I am of the opinion that such a right is not provided for under the RTI Act an such a right cannot be created through judicial interpretation. I have attached a critical analysis of the said judgment along with a similar judgement of the Andhra Pradesh High Court from 2011 (1st attachment). I thank RTI Foundation of India for circulating this judgment earlier (2nd attachment). Please circulate this email widely. If you have a contrary view to what I have expressed on the subject, please feel free to share the same with me. Thanks Venkatesh NayakProgramme Coordinator Access to Information Programme Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative
    1 replies | 217 view(s)
  • karira's Avatar
    6 Days Ago
    The "compensation" awarded under Sec 19(8) will be paid from the funds of the public authority. The "penalty" imposed under sec 20(1) will be borne by the PIO - ie deducted from his salary.
    3 replies | 151 view(s)
  • karira's Avatar
    6 Days Ago
    Please read the TWO Manuals: Manual of e-office procedure: http://darpg.gov.in/darpgwebsite_cms/Document/file/CSMeOP_1st_Edition.pdf Government guidelines on website & email useage : http://www.rtiindia.org/forum/7397-guidelines-government-websites-email-useage-management-government-2.html
    3 replies | 169 view(s)
  • karira's Avatar
    6 Days Ago
    File a Complaint with the Municipal Commissioner of that Zone and ask him to remove the content from the website. This is as per the Official Policy of Government on Government websites. They should not show content which is outdated and plainly wrong information.
    3 replies | 143 view(s)
  • karira's Avatar
    6 Days Ago
    This portal is only meant for discussing issues related to the RTI Act 2005. You will not get any help/guidance/assistance here on all types of general issues.
    5 replies | 105 view(s)
  • karira's Avatar
    6 Days Ago
    This portal is only meant for discussing issues related to the RTI Act 2005. You will not get any help/guidance/clarifications on all types of general issues - like the one your have asked.
    6 replies | 129 view(s)
  • karira's Avatar
    6 Days Ago
    This is already available on the East Delhi MCD: RTI Monitoring System
    2 replies | 177 view(s)
  • karira's Avatar
    6 Days Ago
    Postal Stamp is not a valid mode of payment for RTI application fee - ANYWHERE in India. You have to pay the application fee by a mode of payment that is prescribed in the RTI Rules - for Centre, State, Courts, Legislature, etc. The RTI Rules are available in the guide section of the portal: Guide Please also read: http://www.rtiindia.org/forum/content/ http://www.rtiindia.org/forum/frequently-asked-questions.html
    2 replies | 113 view(s)
  • karira's Avatar
    6 Days Ago
    This is very old news (of 2011) and the facility is DEFUNCT after the MCD was split up into baby MCDs.
    3 replies | 143 view(s)
  • karira's Avatar
    6 Days Ago
    If no reply to your RTI application within the time limit - then it can be safely termed as "deemed denial' of information. File a first appeal with the FAA of Rajasthan SIC immediately. Grounds are "deemed denial" of information.
    9 replies | 334 view(s)
  • karira's Avatar
    1 Week Ago
    Police to inspect signboard ‘errors’ on roads NAVI MUMBAI: A city-based activist has asked the police to survey roads and ascertain if signboards are in tune with the rules laid down by the Motor Vehicle Act. Prabhat Jain, an RTI activist from Belapur, has for months, tried to convince authorities that traffic signs and road markings have errors. His pleas have finally been heard by DCP (traffic) Arvind Salve. "I will ask officials to undertake a survey and ascertain the nature of errors and initiate appropriate measures," he said. Jain said the cops responded only after he filed an RTI demanding a report on traffic signs in the city. He even sent letters to the police commissioner and attached pictures, which proved that the signs were put up without knowledge of the law. "In the letter I have attached photographs to show the lack of knowledge that went into placing these signs. Road markings make no sense at all. Signboards at various spots don't comply with any traffic regulation act," said Jain. He said the most "bizarre" sign he came across was a board that said danger at the entrance of Belapur flyover on Sion-Panvel Road. "I have asked the cops to explain why the flyover is a danger to us," he added. The cops said they will conduct a survey at the earliest. Read More: Police to inspect signboard ?errors? on roads - The Times of India
    0 replies | 213 view(s)
  • karira's Avatar
    1 Week Ago
    karira started a thread RTI Happenings: Haryana: Over 80% posts in MCG vacant in RTI in Media
    Over 80% posts in MCG vacant GURGAON: It is no secret that the MCG is short-staffed, but a recent RTI query has revealed that about 80% of the sanctioned posts in the civic body have been lying vacant. In fact, out of the total sanctioned posts of 2,758 in the MCG, only 521 are filled up, while the remaining 2,237 are still vacant; moreover, 33 officials are on deputation in the civic body, according to the response to the RTI query. Not only that, there are some officials who have been handling dual charge, like executive engineer Vijay Pal, who is also in charge of the Palwal Municipal Council, and MS Bhardwaj, the fire station officer of Sec-29 Gurgaon who is also the director of Haryana Fire Services (Panchkula). This probably explains the sluggish pace at which the MCG functions. Important posts such as additional commissioner, deputy town planner, architect, patwari, chief medical officer, medical officer, legal assistant, leading fire man, manager (IT), and assistant IT manager are all vacant. Also, other crucial posts like chief town planner, senior town planner, chief engineer, executive engineer are filled up by those officials who are on deputation. They are from other departments such as the town and country planning, public health engineering, irrigation, panchayat, police and public works. Out of the sanctioned seven executive engineer posts, only four have been filled up and rest three have been vacant for a very long time. Likewise, six junior engineer posts are also vacant. Also all four accountant posts are vacant and out of the six sanitary inspector posts, three are vacant. The maximum number of vacant posts are of computer clerks, where out of 67 sanctioned posts, only two are filled. The fire preparedness is also severely lacking, as the fire department comes under the MCG, but only 16 firemen are there. Out of the total 64 posts, 48 are still vacant. And, ever wondered why the city looks so unhygienic? The answer probably lies in this fact that out of the sanctioned 2,216 posts of safai karamcharis, 1,885 are still vacant. Read More: Over 80% posts in MCG vacant - The Times of India
    0 replies | 98 view(s)
  • karira's Avatar
    1 Week Ago
    One of the CIC orders, referred to in the above news report, is attached to this post.
    2 replies | 296 view(s)
  • karira's Avatar
    1 Week Ago
    CIC recommends ordinary postal stamp as RTI fee instrument NEW DELHI: People seeking information under RTI Act may now be able to use postal stamps as application fee if a recommendation of the Central Information Commission is accepted by the Centre. Two Information Commissioners in two separate cases-- R K Jain and Raghubir Singh-- have made a common recommendation to the Department of Personnel and Training for implementing postal stamps as a mode of payment of RTI fee thus reducing hassles of applicants. RTI users now have to pay a fee of Rs 10 either in cash, bank demand draft or Indian Postal Order to get information. Some authorities like Army and Indian air force refuse to accept applications drawn in favour of Accounts Officer despite clear directives of the Department of Personnel and Training causing hassles to applicants. "The appellant has submitted that the postal department's recommendation for use of ordinary postal stamps for payment of RTI fee is both practical and user friendly. The Commission finds merit in the appellant's submissions and would urge the DoPT to consider this at the earliest. "In this connection it is noted that the government of Tamil Nadu has already allowed payment of RTI fee by affixing court fee stamps, Information Commissioner Basant Seth said in the matter of activist R K Jain. Agreeing with Seth, Information Commissioner Sridhar Acharyulu also issued an exhaustive order on the issue recommending to DoPT to avail the opportunity of giving New Year Gift to the citizens by permitting and publicising the use of ordinary postal stamps for the payment of RTI fee. "Accepting postal stamps for RTI fee would resolve many difficulties in payment, besides preventing wastage of public money in returning or rejecting the IPOs or spending much larger amounts than Rs 10, for realising Rs 10, and avoidable litigation," he said. Acharyulu said returning the IPO to the appellant involves writing a letter on a white paper, co .. Read more at: CIC recommends ordinary postal stamp as RTI fee instrument - The Economic Times
    2 replies | 296 view(s)
  • karira's Avatar
    1 Week Ago
    Why dont you simply ask for the "inspection" of the entire file related to ............
    6 replies | 209 view(s)
  • karira's Avatar
    1 Week Ago
    Send a letter reminder to the concerned IC and remind him that although 45 days have passed since the hearing the order has not been passed. Send the letter by speed post and keep track of the delivery status. By the way, did you attend the hearing ? What were the final words of the IC ? Did he say something like "decision reserved" or "decision will be pronounced on..." ?
    11 replies | 316 view(s)
  • karira's Avatar
    1 Week Ago
    Which commission is it ? Centre or State ? Which State ?
    11 replies | 316 view(s)
  • karira's Avatar
    1 Week Ago
    You can file a RTI application with the PIO of the Cooperative department of the state and get the information. Your RTI application has to be as per the RTI Rules of Kerala. These are available in the Guide section of the portal. Please also read: http://www.rtiindia.org/forum/content/ Guide http://www.rtiindia.org/forum/frequently-asked-questions.html
    4 replies | 144 view(s)
  • karira's Avatar
    1 Week Ago
    The mistake you made was sending an email. Better to communicate with people in the CIC ONLY through hard copies sent by Registered Post or Speed Post. Make a serious complaint to the Secretary CIC about not taking cognizance of emails in the CIC. Quote sections from The Manual for e-office Procedure - which CIC is supposed to follow. Simultaneously lodge a public grievance on the PG portal that CIC is not following the directions of the government and the PMO. Write a letter to the PM saying that although he wants the country to move to the internet age, here is a Commission which does not take emails seriously. This is as far as the email story is concerned. In future, when you send a email to someone in the Government, just take a print out and also send a hard copy to that person. This way it will be diarized and he/she cannot escape. ================= Regarding the Complaints, there is no option but to refile the complaints clearly quoting the Delhi HC judgment that was cited earlier.
    18 replies | 425 view(s)
  • karira's Avatar
    1 Week Ago
    This information is already available on the website of Oil Marketing companies. Check their websites.
    5 replies | 199 view(s)
  • karira's Avatar
    1 Week Ago
    Which "competent authority" has not framed rules for carrying out the provisions of the RTI Act ? For example, the Supreme Court has not framed any RTIO Rules but clearly state that they follow rules of the Central Government.
    1 replies | 135 view(s)
  • karira's Avatar
    1 Week Ago
    @cryingtruth You had a similar problem with complaints being returned by CIC. Please guide @ManmohanSingh with regards to the exact steps you took to get CIC to accept the complaint. @ManmohanSingh 1. Complaints are not supposed to have any format. The July 2012 RTI Rules for the centre only deal with second appeals. http://cic.gov.in/CIC-Notifications/RTIRules2012.pdf 2. There is a Delhi HC order that CIC cannot reject complaints without a proper hearing. Please see the date of the following Delhi HC judgment and the dates when your Complaints were returned. If there is a proper case, file a "Contempt of Court" petition against the CIC. http://www.rtiindia.org/forum/docs/court-judgements-rti-issues/441-del-h-c-quashes-practice-summary-disposal
    18 replies | 425 view(s)
  • karira's Avatar
    1 Week Ago
    Was the RTI under Central RTI Rules or any State RTI Rules ?
    13 replies | 434 view(s)
  • karira's Avatar
    1 Week Ago
    Better to pay the additional fees and get the pages offered and see if the information provided is enough. Then plan the next step.
    3 replies | 253 view(s)
  • karira's Avatar
    1 Week Ago
    Once you get the information from the CIC website, file a first appeal for "malafide" denial of information. The first appeal has to be filed within 30 days of getting the PIOs reply.
    18 replies | 425 view(s)
  • karira's Avatar
    1 Week Ago
    This information is already available on the CIC website: 1. Go to CIC 2. Click on "Status of Appeals & Complaints" 3. Search by diary number / name / year FOR EXAMPLE: 2012: S.No. Diary No./ Diary Date / File Number Submitted By/ Address Public Authority Dealing Officer Status 1. 174032/ 19-10-2012/ CIC/AD/C/2012/001187 MANMOHAN SINGH/ B-7/115, BHALASWA RESETTLEMENT COLONY, DELHI Government of NCT of Delhi IC(SA) Fresh Dak 2. 168277/ 25-09-2012/ - MANMOHAN SINGH/ TEH MUNSYARI,DISTT PITHORAGARH GARHWAL Ministry of Home Affairs IC(VS) Fresh Dak 3. 165690/ 14-09-2012/ - MANMOHAN SINGH/ TEH JAGARDHRI,DISTT YAMUNA NAGAR Ministry of Defence IC(RM) Fresh Dak 4. 161035/ 28-08-2012/ - MANMOHAN SINGH/ B-7/115, BHALASWA RESETTLEMENT COLONY DELHI - DO to IC(AD) Fresh Dak 5. 147209/ 02-07-2012/ - MANMOHAN SINGH/ VILL GOLFA,DISTT PITHORAGARH, Ministry of Home Affairs IC(VS) Fresh Dak 6. 140061/ 07-06-2012/ - MANMOHAN SINGH/ VPO BALCHHAPPER,TEH JAGADHARI,DISTT YAMUNA NAGAR Ministry of Defence IC(RM) Fresh Dak 7. 136451/ 24-05-2012/ - MANMOHAN SINGH / B 7/115 , BHALASWA RESETTLEMENT COLONY Government of NCT of Delhi IC(SA) Fresh Dak 8. 116760/ 06-03-2012/ - MANMOHAN SINGH / 255 SEC-33 A, CHANDIGARH - DO to IC(DS) Fresh Dak 9. 111152/ 16-02-2012/ - MANMOHAN SINGH / C-86, PKT-11, NEW DELHI-25 Ministry of Human Resource Development IC(RM) Fresh Dak Back ] 2013: Number of results found: 27 : Results for DateS.No.Diary No./ Diary Date / File NumberSubmitted By/ AddressPublic AuthorityDealing OfficerStatus1.186724/ 29-11-2013/ -MANMOHAN SINGH/ BHALASWA RESETTLEMENT COLONY,DELHI 42-Central RegistryFresh Dak2.183895/ 20-11-2013/ CIC/MP/A/2014/000028MANMOHAN SINGH KAPUR/ ELDECO UTOPIA, SEC-93/A, EXPRESSWAY ONIDA-Central RegistryRegistered3.170955/ 30-09-2013/ -MANMOHAN SINGH/ B-7/115 BHALASWA RESETTLEMENT COLONY DELHI 42-Central RegistryFresh Dak4.170952/ 30-09-2013/ -MANMOHAN SINGH/ B-7/115 BHALASWA RESETTLEMENT COLONY DELHI 42-Central RegistryFresh Dak5.167705/ 18-09-2013/ CIC/VS/A/2013/001721MANMOHAN SINGH/ NEAR NAVRANG SWEET NEAR CIVIL LINES RUDRAPUR UK-Central RegistryRegistered6.157620/ 08-08-2013/ CIC/VS/A/2013/001412MANMOHAN SINGH/ NR NAVRANG SWEETS, RUDRAPUR USN-Central RegistryRegistered7.157619/ 08-08-2013/ CIC/VS/A/2013/001411MANMOHAN SINGH/ NR NAVRANG SWEETS, RUDRAPUR USN, UK-Central RegistryRegistered8.157616/ 08-08-2013/ CIC/VS/A/2013/001409MANMOHAN SINGH/ NR NAVRANG SWEETS, RUDRAPUR USN, UK-Central RegistryRegistered9.157615/ 08-08-2013/ CIC/VS/A/2013/001408MANMOHAN SINGH/ NR NAVRANG SWEETS, RUDRAPUR USN, UK-Central RegistryRegistered10.157614/ 08-08-2013/ CIC/VS/A/2013/001426MANMOHAN SINGH/ NR NAVRANG SWEETS, RUDRAPUR USN, UK-Central RegistryRegistered11.157613/ 08-08-2013/ CIC/VS/A/2013/001427MANMOHAN SINGH/ NR NAVRANG SWEETS, RUDRAPUR USN, UK-Central RegistryRegistered12.157515/ 08-08-2013/ CIC/VS/A/2013/001421DR MANMOHAN SINGH/ NEAR NAVRANG SWEETS CIVIL LINES RUDRAPUR UDAM SINGH NAGAR UTTARAKHAND-Central RegistryRegistered13.149435/ 11-07-2013/ -MANMOHAN SINGH/ BALCHHAPPAR , JAGADHARI , YAMUNANAGAR-DO to IC(LS)Fresh Dak14.133273/ 10-05-2013/ -DR MANMOHAN SINGH / NAINIVIEW GUEST HOUSE, NR NAVRANG SWEETS , CIVIL LINES , RUDRAPUR , U S NAGAR-DO to IC(VS)Fresh Dak15.133044/ 09-05-2013/ -MANMOHAN SINGH/ NR NAVRANG SWEETS, DISTT-USNMinistry of FinanceDO to IC(VS)Fresh Dak16.133041/ 09-05-2013/ -MANMOHAN SINGH/ NR NAVRANG SWEETS, DISTT-USNMinistry of FinanceDO to IC(VS)Fresh Dak17.129009/ 25-04-2013/ -MANMOHAN SINGH SIC/ PATEL NAGAR II,GHAZIABAD-DO to IC(RM)Fresh Dak18.127914/ 22-04-2013/ -MANMOHAN SINGH/ NR NAVRANG SWEETS, RUDRAPURMinistry of FinanceDO to IC(VS)Fresh Dak19.127549/ 18-04-2013/ -MANMOHAN SINGH/ BHALASWA RESETTLEMENT COLONY DELHIGovernment of NCT of DelhiIC(SA)Fresh Dak20.120605/ 19-03-2013/ -MANMOHAN SINGH/ CIVIL LINES,RUDRAPURMinistry of FinanceDO to IC(VS)Fresh Dak21.120600/ 19-03-2013/ -MANMOHAN SINGH/ CIVIL LINES,RUDRAPURMinistry of FinanceDO to IC(VS)Fresh Dak22.120572/ 19-03-2013/ -MANMOHAN SINGH/ RUDRAPUR, U S NAGARMinistry of FinanceDO to IC(VS)Fresh Dak23.120568/ 19-03-2013/ -MANMOHAN SINGH/ NR NAVRANG SWEETS, U S NAGARMinistry of FinanceDO to IC(VS)Fresh Dak24.120557/ 19-03-2013/ -MANMOHAN SINGH/ RUDRAPUR,U S NAGAR,Ministry of FinanceDO to IC(VS)Fresh Dak25.120554/ 19-03-2013/ -MANMOHAN SINGH/ GURU NANAY NAGAR, LUCKNOWUT of ChandigarhIC(RM)Fresh Dak26.120532/ 19-03-2013/ -MANMOHAN SINGH/ CIVIL LINES,RUDRAPUR,Ministry of FinanceDO to IC(VS)Fresh Dak27.104224/ 16-01-2013/ -MANMOHAN SINGH/ BAL CHHAPPAR , JAGADHARI , YAMUNA NAGAR-DO to IC(LS)Fresh Dak
    18 replies | 425 view(s)
  • karira's Avatar
    1 Week Ago
    karira replied to a thread Rti clarification in Ask for RTI Query
    If the interviews were recorded on video, then the recording has to be provided under RTI. File a first appeal as suggested earlier.
    3 replies | 170 view(s)
  • karira's Avatar
    1 Week Ago
    You can also file a RTI with the PIO of the collectors office asking for "inspection oif the entire file related to correspondence from CMs office regarding......letter No.....dtd....". When you inspect the file, you will know all the details of the Collectors non action when you read the file notings.
    8 replies | 298 view(s)
  • karira's Avatar
    1 Week Ago
    karira replied to a thread Mis use of RTI in Ask for RTI Query
    Also, if the same information has been provided earlier to the same applicant, you can also ask him to refer to your previous reply Nr.....dtd...... By the way, assets / liabilities / loan / gift / form 16 are to be all normally denied since they are personal information. This applicant has raised the issue of larger public interest and corruption. You have to also see if those are valid or not. Was there any enquiry against the person whose details are being asked ? If yes, then the applicant certainly has grounds for seeking information.
    4 replies | 215 view(s)
  • karira's Avatar
    1 Week Ago
    Such information should already be available on the website of UGC / DEC / AICTE First check those websites and then file the RTI. Please read: Right to Information Act
    3 replies | 175 view(s)
  • karira's Avatar
    1 Week Ago
    karira replied to a thread family problems in Ask for RTI Query
    You will not get teh pay slip under RTI...but you cn easily get: 1. Monthly remuneration 2. System of compensation (ie grade pay and pay scale). These have to be mandatoraly displayed by the railways department, where your husband works. Alternatively, file a RTI application with the PIO of that department and ask for the information to be disclosed to you as per Sec 4(1)(b)(x) of the RTI Act 2005.
    6 replies | 190 view(s)
  • karira's Avatar
    1 Week Ago
    karira replied to a thread electricity bill in Non RTI Issues
    You can ask your electricity distribution company for a copy of the same.
    4 replies | 141 view(s)
  • karira's Avatar
    1 Week Ago
    Do you maintain data of Electricity meter categorised as per government employee or not ? Is there anything on record stating that a particular meter belongs to Govt. employee, doctor, lawyer, MP, etc. ?
    2 replies | 149 view(s)
  • karira's Avatar
    1 Week Ago
    ​Posts demerged from another thread and started a new thread.
    7 replies | 142 view(s)
  • karira's Avatar
    1 Week Ago
    karira replied to a thread validity of IPO in Non RTI Issues
    As per the gazette notification and postal department circulars attached in the thread given in post No. 2 above, the validity of IPO is 2 years. Just because the PIO is ignorant about it, does not mean that we should also accept the PIOs version !
    3 replies | 121 view(s)
  • karira's Avatar
    1 Week Ago
    karira replied to a thread validity of IPO in Non RTI Issues
    It is available in this thread: http://www.rtiindia.org/forum/116656-validity-indian-postal-order.html
    3 replies | 121 view(s)
More Activity
About Shakti Prakash

Basic Information

Date of Birth
June 30, 1967 (47)
Personal Information

About the Personal Details.

Location:
agra
Your Real Name:
Shakti Prakash

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
1
Posts Per Day
0.00
General Information
Last Activity
10-01-2008
Join Date
09-02-2008
Referrals
1

1 Friend

Showing Friends 1 to 1 of 1

Shakti Prakash's Downloads

  Filename Total Downloads Rating Files Uploaded Last Updated
No results to show...
No results to display...
No results to display...
No results to display...

Activity Information
  • Total Points:
  • 12.35
  • Activity Level:
  • 1
  • To Next Level:
  • 7.65
  • Percent Into Level:
  • 23.5% Achieved
  • Daily Activity:
  • 0 / 20.54 (0%)
  • Weekly Activity:
  • 0.35 / 143.75 (0.24%)
  • Monthly Activity:
  • 1.05 / 636.61 (0.16%)
Points
  • Points for Attachment:
  • 0
  • Points for Posts:
  • 0
  • Points for Posts (Own Threads):
  • 0
  • Points for Threads:
  • 0
  • Points for Thread Ratings Given:
  • 0
  • Points for Thread Ratings Received:
  • 0
  • Points for Polls Posted:
  • 0
  • Points for Poll Votes:
  • 0
  • Points for Confirmed Friends:
  • 0
  • Points for Reputation (Given):
  • 0
  • Points for Reputation (Received):
  • 0
  • Points for Referrals:
  • 0
  • Points for Days Registered:
  • 0
  • Points for Blogs:
  • 0
  • Points for Blog Comments:
  • 0
  • Points for Mentions Given:
  • 0
  • Points for Mentions Received:
  • 0
  • Points for Tags Given:
  • 0
  • Points for Tags Received:
  • 0
  • Points for Profile Completed:
  • 0
  • Points for Contests Won:
  • 0
  • Points for Registration:
  • 0
  • Points For [DBTech] DragonByte Gallery Uploads:
  • 0
  • Points For Award Bonuses:
  • 0
  • Points For Thanks Given:
  • 0
  • Points For Likes Given:
  • 0
  • Points For Thanks Received:
  • 0
  • Points For Likes Received:
  • 0
  • Points For Problems Posted:
  • 0
  • Points For Problems Solved:
  • 0
  • Points For Solutions Validated:
  • 0
1 Achievements
Achievement Earned on 06-22-2014 08:03 AM
Started off by making 1st Post
Achievement Earned on 06-22-2014 08:03 AM
0 Awards
Currently Held Trophies
Previously Held Trophies


About RTI INDIA

    RTI INDIA: Invoking Your Rights. We provide easy ways to request, analyze & share Government documents by use of Right to Information and by way of community support.

Follow us on

Twitter Facebook youtube Tumblr RTI Microblog RSS Feed Apple App Store Google Play for Android

Newsletter Subscription