Topic Identifier

Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Info panel flexes muscles, fines top bureaucrats

  1. Info panel flexes muscles, fines top bureaucrats

    New Delhi: Last month, three senior bureaucrats in Chandigarh were rudely reminded that information is money.

    The three, all joint secretaries in the Union territory’s government, were asked by the Central Information Commission (CIC), the Union government body responsible for monitoring the Right To Information (RTI) Act, to together ante up Rs25,000.

    A joint secretary is the second highest level in India’s bureaucracy. Even the country’s apex investigating agency, the Central Bureau of Investigation, needs permission from the ministry concerned before it can launch an investigation against officers at this level.

    The crime in this case: the three officers had not provided the information sought by a citizen under the Act.

    The chain of events leading up to the fine began with Mehar Singh, a resident of Chandigarh, seeking information from the Union territory’s home department using the provisions of the RTI Act. When Singh did not receive the information within 30 days as mandated by the Act, he approached the CIC. The commission asked the concerned principal information officer—all government departments have information officers to which RTI applications are made; only when they are not answered do the applicants approach the CIC—Satya Thakur to pay a fine of Rs25,000 for the delay.

    Thakur responded with a detailed report on the movement of the applicant’s request through the department and said that although she had written to the senior officers concerned for the information several times, they had not responded in time. The CIC then asked the three senior officers from the home department and the finance department to share the fine of Rs25,000 between themselves.

    The CIC’s fine, levied on such senior officers, seems to have had the desired effect. “The (Mehar Singh) case is a reminder that all departments need to make their RTI systems more efficient,” says one of the officers who was fined and does not wish to be identified. Eventually, the three joint secretaries apologized to CIC and were spared the fine.

    Not everyone has been as lucky. The commission has thus far penalized around 40 information officers for not having provided information on time to RTI applicants. An information officer with the Delhi Development Authority (DDA), the Capital’s urban development agency, says that imposing such fines on information officers was not fair. “There are so many applications under which people ask for all sorts of general information which requires coordination among all the wings of the DDA. After all, how much of manpower can we use to dig up old files?” asks the officer, who did not wish to be identified.

    The officer adds that each of the designated 50 information officers at DDA are handling between five and 10 RTI applications a day. “In fact, many advocates have started a business of filing RTI applications on behalf of citizens against the DDA and MCD (Municipal Corporation of Delhi),” says the officer.

    He suggests that the Rs10 fee to be paid with RTI applications needs to be raised to ensure that only serious applicants lined up. However, an RTI activist says the CIC has not penalized enough officers to ensure that they routinely send information on time.

    “There have been over 4,000 cases filed with the CIC and it has imposed fines in less than 40 cases,” says Arvind Kejriwal of non-governmental organization Parivartan. Kejriwal won the Ramon Magsaysay award in 2006 for his work in the RTI area. He adds that the CIC is not doing enough to ensure that bureaucrats treat RTI applications with respect.

    Fines cannot be imposed “left, right and centre,” says a senior official at the CIC who did not wish to be identified. He adds that the RTI Act itself is new and that the CIC needs to only “gradually start using all provisions of the Act” (such as fines) so that “the system also is able to accommodate the needs of a burgeoning number of applicants.”

    Info panel flexes muscles, fines top bureaucrats - livemint

  2. Re: Info panel flexes muscles, fines top bureaucrats

    HI evbody
    Thanks for this post well muscle flexing by Info Commission upon joint secys of UT Chandigarh would be an eye opener for many others in country. Since i am also working as Executive Engineer in a Centre Govt. deptt. i have seen these Secys and joint Secys using official assets and machinery solely for their personal use . RTI could be helpfule in putting brakes on wastage of govt. setup (man and material) done by them .
    Nick Chauhan

  3. Re: Info panel flexes muscles, fines top bureaucrats

    HI Ganpati
    Could u please tell me that Information sought under RTI act could be used as legitimate information for arguing a legal suit. In case Information supplied is wrong , incorrect or misleading can PIO be penalised or prosecuted for supplying wrong information. Or what is max action against PIO either by Information Commission or Court of law.
    Nick Chauhan

  4. Re: Info panel flexes muscles, fines top bureaucrats

    pl.give name of the case,number and date of the decision so that j can read the whole decision on CIC site.

  5. Re: Info panel flexes muscles, fines top bureaucrats

    Dear Nick Chauhan,

    I am not a legal practioner. However I will tell you my views on your query. The information sought through RTI is one that is obtained " through a due process of law" and can definitely be used in the course of arguing another case in a court of law. Since the RTI Act provides of issue of certified copies of documents, if demanded by an applicant, it will be better to make use of this provision of the RTI Act, if the aim of the applicant is to use the document as an evidence in another case.

    As regards wrong information being supplied, Sec. 18 (1) (e) of the RTI Act 2005 provides the remedy. Under this section, the applicant has to make a complaint to the CIC/SIC, if he believes that he or she has been given incomplete misleading or false information under the Act. While dealing with such complaints, the RTI Act [ u/s 18 (3) ] provides the CIC/SIC, the same powers as that of a Civil Court, to inquire into the complaint. Besides they are also empowered to impose other penalties, while deciding an appeal/complaint.

  6. Re: Info panel flexes muscles, fines top bureaucrats

    Dear Narayanvarma,

    The following are some of the case-citations connected with the above news item:




  7. Re: Info panel flexes muscles, fines top bureaucrats

    HI Ganpati
    Thanx a lot for giving valuable advice .

  8. #8
    C J Karira
    Blog Entries
    Rep Power

    Re: Info panel flexes muscles, fines top bureaucrats


    I am also not a legal practitioner, but will give you the logical reply that my advocate gave me:

    1. Yes, information gathered can be used in another court of law.
    2. In fact, information gathered under RTI should have more value than
    information obtained by other means.
    3. If information obtained under RTI Act is different than the information
    obtained by other means, my advocate feels that the first has
    precedence over the second. He gave a explanation, but I could not
    fully understand it.

    Regarding your second point about "penalties", besides what Ganpat said, Section 19, 8, b and c also empowers the CIC/SIC to:

    b.require the public authority to compensate the complainant for any
    loss or other detriment suffered;

    c.impose any of the penalties provided under this Act;

    What is the "maximum" penalty till now ? I know of Rs 25,000.00.


    RTI INDIA: Invoking Your Rights. We provide easy ways to request, analyze & share Government documents by use of Right to Information and by way of community support.

Follow us on

Twitter Facebook Apple App Store Google Play for Android