Topic Identifier

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 25 to 32 of 33

Thread: Central Information Commission opens up UPSC finally: A landmark judgement

  1. #25
    Posts
    44,492
    Name:
    C J Karira
    Blog Entries
    9
    Rep Power
    552

    Re: Central Information Commission opens up UPSC finally: A landmark judgement


    Can anyone who has appeared for the Civil Services exams, please help in clarifying this "dummy candidate" issue. I am not able to understand it.



  2. #26

    Re: Central Information Commission opens up UPSC finally: A landmark judgement


    UPSC is resorting to all kinds of funny & weired arguments to bolster it case.

    Dummy Candidates is it's latest Ploy. Hope the judges see through it.
    Not granting a stay is perhaps a pointer.
    Last edited by sidmis; 30-09-08 at 09:04 PM.

  3. Re: Marksheets of individual candidates are not third party information


    As reported in The Times of India (30 Nov 2008)

    Marks of candidates in public exam is public document: HC

    </ARTTITLE>
    NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court has said that marks obtained by successful candidates in examination conducted by government body is a public <TABLE style="MARGIN-TOP: 10px; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 4px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 8px" cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 align=left><TBODY><TR><TD id=bellyad></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>document and it should be revealed under RTI Act.

    "Once the examination is over and candidates are declared successful, it becomes a public document which can be revealed under Right to Information Act," Justice G S Sistani said.

    The court's observation came while hearing a petition filed by Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) challenging CIC order which had directed the Commission to reveal the marks obtained by successful candidates in civil services examination to a third party.

    The court asked the counsel appearing for UPSC to take instruction from the Commission and adjourned the matter.

    Complete news at : Marks of candidates in public exam is public document: HC-India-The Times of India
    Defeat is not final when you fall down. It is final when you refuse to get up.

  4. #28

    Re: Central Information Commission opens up UPSC finally: A landmark judgement



    Tnx a lot for putting such a useful information. Sanjay manocha

  5. #29
    Posts
    44,492
    Name:
    C J Karira
    Blog Entries
    9
    Rep Power
    552

    Re: Central Information Commission opens up UPSC finally: A landmark judgement


    As reported by Purnima S Tripathi in frontline.in issue dated March 13 - 26, 2010:
    Hints of change

    UPSC

    Hints of change


    A reformatting of the civil services examination will hopefully increase transparency in the evaluation process.


    AFTER years of dithering, the Government of India has finally agreed to change the format of the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) civil services examination. The present format had come under severe criticism from both members of the public as well as from parliamentary committees, and there had been tremendous pressure on the government to review it. Its shortcomings, which have come to light following queries made under the Right to Information (RTI) Act, warranted urgent action.

    To begin with, the Preliminary examination, which consists of general studies and optional papers, may be replaced with an aptitude test, to be called the Civil Services Aptitude Test. The test will comprise two objective-type papers, which will be common for all candidates appearing for the examination. A proposal to this effect has received the Union government’s approval.

    Confirming this, Shantanu Consul, Secretary, Department of Personnel, Government of India, told this correspondent that the proposed changes would come into effect next year as the notification for this year’s examination had already come out. Refusing to disclose any other details about the new format, he said it was the prerogative of the UPSC, which conducted the examination, to notify the changes.

    A senior UPSC official said that “some letter from the government regarding proposed changes in the system of civil services examination had indeed been received, but the exact nature of the changes approved cannot be disclosed yet”. But going by the speech of the UPSC Chairman, Prof. D.P. Agrawal, on the occasion of UPSC Foundation Day celebrations last year, there will be a change in the Preliminary examination format, a review of the contents of the Main examination by an expert committee, a lowering of the age limit for entry into the services, and a reduction in the number of attempts.

    In his speech, Agrawal said that the UPSC had been endeavouring to develop a recruitment system that tested the aptitude and competency of candidates for an increasingly specialised public administration while ensuring social justice and adequate representation for all sections so that the government became more inclusive and participatory.

    In this connection, he said: “One of the recommendations made by the Commission to the government is that a Civil Services Aptitude Test replace the existing Civil Services (Preliminary) Examination. The proposal is to have two objective-type papers that are common to all candidates.”

    Explaining why this was needed, he said: “The emphasis is on testing the aptitude of the candidate for the demanding life in the civil services as well as on ethical and moral dimensions of decision-making. The proposed scheme will also provide a level playing field and equity since all candidates will have to attempt common papers.” He said the Commission wanted the Main examination to remain the same until an expert committee appointed by the Commission went into various aspects of it.

    Regarding the lowering of the age limit for entry into the civil services, he said it was desirable but cautioned that such a decision could affect the interests of rural candidates, who often complete their graduation later than their urban counterparts.

    Besides, he said, the number of attempts – four at present – should be reduced. “A reduction in the number of attempts allowed at the examination is, however, called for so as to remove the premium on cramming and memorisation that a large number of attempts provides.”

    He said a natural corollary of these proposed modifications was the need to ensure that the performance of the officers selected through the examination was tracked, particularly during the initial years.

    Other than direct recruitment, another mode of entry into the civil services is by promotion from State services. At present, this is done on the basis of annual confidential reports prepared through selection committee meetings. The Commission proposes to make changes in the promotion quota by introducing a three-tier recruitment process that involves a limited competitive examination, interview and assessment of service record. “This would have the salutary effect of encouraging competition and privileging merit. The States will also benefit from the scheme. Such a system could, in time, be extended to promotions within the Central services as well,” the Chairman said.

    If all of these proposals are put into effect, this will have a major impact on the system of recruitment for the civil services. Over a million applications come to the UPSC for its 14 regular examinations and also other recruitments it conducts every year. On the basis of the tests, the Commission recommends the appointment of about 5,000 officers to various services. In addition, it deals with the promotion of 600 Central service officers and the induction of about 300 officers from the State services to the all India services. In such a mammoth exercise, it is only natural that grievances arise. Until recently, complaints against the UPSC failed to get highlighted. But now, with the RTI Act in place, more and more complaints, especially about irregularities, are coming to light, and the government will have to deal with them sooner or later.

    One frequently voiced complaint is regarding the system of evaluation of answer papers and the scaling\moderation formula applied by the UPSC to remove inter-subject and inter-examiner variability. There is no transparency about how this is achieved. The refusal of the UPSC to disclose model answers and cut-off marks for various subjects or how it brings parity among subjects as varied as Pali literature and mechanical engineering or medical science and Dogri literature has made the selection process suspect. The UPSC itself has admitted that there is no standard system to evaluate subjects as diverse as Marathi literature and animal husbandry.

    Repeated petitions of applicants in various courts and with the Central Information Commission (CIC) have yielded no results. According to experts, the opaqueness has given rise to serious doubts about the credibility of the entire selection process. The parliamentary standing committee headed by Rajya Sabha member E.M.S. Natchiappan in 2008 had questioned the refusal to disclose cut-off marks as well as the scaling/moderation formula used to bring parity. The committee, while studying the demands for grant by the UPSC, had looked into the functioning of the Commission and come across a horde of complaints by members of the public. Though the committee failed to elicit an explanation from the UPSC, it did manage to push the UPSC into reviewing the examination format to some extent.

    “I fail to understand what is so sacrosanct about the scaling/moderation formula that the UPSC refuses to disclose it. This disclosure will make their system all the more credible as students will know exactly where they stand and why,” said Natchiappan.

    Strengthening the doubts about its evaluation process is the UPSC’s own stand on the issue. In reply to a petition in the CIC by an applicant seeking disclosure of the cut-off marks, the scaling formula and model answers, vide appeal no. CIC/WB/A/2007/00694 of 2008, the UPSC said that the Commission did not maintain any model answers for descriptive papers, that the evaluation methodology adopted by the examiners were purely informal and were not maintained in the UPSC’s records, that no instruction sheets as an alternative to model answers were maintained, and only general instructions common to all subjects for marking scripts and which referred to general issues/standards/precautions to be followed during the evaluation process were sent to the examiners. According to the UPSC, these general instructions are “secret” and their disclosure will lead to a “deleterious effect on the system/procedure being followed that has proved to be time-tested”.

    What, however, raises a question mark over the UPSC’s “time-tested” claim is the fact that even randomisation of roll numbers by the UPSC, which is a basic computer-based function with no scope for any mistake as the applications are computer-readable, has been found to be faulty.

    In another RTI query, it has been brought to light that almost every year since 2003 the total number of candidates as per the roll numbers allotted is more than the total number of those who applied. According to a reply filed by the UPSC (No.9\7\2007-EIII), the total number of applicants in the 2003 Civil Services Preliminary examination was 3,16,495; the first roll number allotted was obviously 000001 but the last roll number was 316587, meaning thereby that 92 was the difference in those who applied and those who got their roll numbers. Similarly, 3,49,025 candidates applied for the Preliminary examination in 2004, but the last roll number allotted was 349464, which is 439 more. In 2005, the difference was 172, and in 2006, it was as huge as 7,867. In a letter written on May 31, 2008, again in reply to an RTI query, the UPSC explained the difference in the roll numbers and the total number of those who applied thus: “It is informed that roll numbers are allotted randomly and due to transfer of mix-up of applications of other examinations, the number of total candidates applied may not match with that of the last roll number.”

    When such incongruous mistakes come up in even its basic functioning, it is natural that doubts will be raised about more complicated procedures such as the scaling/moderation of marks or the methodology of evaluation. But so far these subjects have been treated like a holy cow both by the UPSC and by the Government of India, and this has resulted in a plethora of writ petitions in various courts. At least six such petitions are pending in the Delhi High Court.
    Twitter: @cjkarira

  6. #30

    What are the changes in upsc examination format?


    What are the changes that the govt. of india has agreed to do in the UPSC examination format?
    Pls specify...

  7. #31
    Posts
    44,492
    Name:
    C J Karira
    Blog Entries
    9
    Rep Power
    552

    Re: What are the changes in upsc examination format?


    Quote Originally Posted by akgupta View Post
    What are the changes that the govt. of india has agreed to do in the UPSC examination format?
    Pls specify...
    Please read post # 29 above.
    Twitter: @cjkarira

  8. #32
    Posts
    44,492
    Name:
    C J Karira
    Blog Entries
    9
    Rep Power
    552

    Re: Central Information Commission opens up UPSC finally: A landmark judgement


    As reported by Nidhi Sharma in economictimes.com on 20 November 2010:
    Apex court asks UPSC to divulge civil services selection under RTI - The Economic Times

    Apex court asks UPSC to divulge civil services selection under RTI


    NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has asked the UPSC to reveal details of civil services selection process for those who seek it under the Right to Information .

    UPSC had been resisting demands for divulging the selection process, including scaling system and cut-off marks, despite orders by the Central Information Commission and Delhi high court. The legal battle between UPSC and civil services aspirants finally came to an end on Thursday when a bench of Justices Aftab Alam and R M Lodha asked UPSC to withdraw its petition and provide information to students.

    Students have been fighting for transparency in civil services examination since 2006, when results for UPSC preliminary examinations were declared. Several students, who had not qualified, filed RTI applications with UPSC seeking information on raw marks and cut-off marks in subjects, the scaling procedure and model answers for different questions in subjects.

    The main contention of the students was that the level of difficulty of papers in 23 optional subjects did not match. The students also felt that UPSC did not have a fair scaling procedure to match the performance of examinees who had opted for different subjects.

    However, UPSC argued that revealing model answers or cut-off marks would benefit private coaching institutes, which would field dummy candidates and crack the system. When aspirants approached CIC, the commission directed UPSC on November 13, 2006, to divulge all information. But UPSC challenged this order in the Delhi high court.

    Later it moved the Supreme Court through a special leave petition. The matter came up for final judgment on Thursday. The bench observed that UPSC examination system would change from 2011 and it should not have any reservations about divulging its old selection process. UPSC would now have to divulge details to the students in a month.

    Speaking to ET, senior advocate Prashant Bhushan said: “The Supreme Court observed that a new examination system would be in place in 2011 so UPSC’s plea that its system would be compromised does not stand. UPSC was asked to withdraw the petition. Now it would have to divulge details to the civil services aspirants.”

    “Though the system has changed, we will know what was happening with us in the previous years. We would be able to pin-point the flaws in the arbitrary system which was followed over the years,” said Amit, a student who has been fighting the legal battle since 2006.
    Twitter: @cjkarira

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast


About RTI INDIA

    RTI INDIA: Invoking Your Rights. We provide easy ways to request, analyze & share Government documents by use of Right to Information and by way of community support.

Follow us on

Twitter Facebook Apple App Store Google Play for Android