The third reference is not opening. Anyway I feel that there is not much to gain in persuing. I feel that the choice of one's discipliniary authority is not of the public servant. So long as he is your superior officer how does it matter ? In case the punishment if any awarded by him you can challenge it before the next superior authority or Head of Department or even before the court of law.
The AA has said that the information is not held. RTI Act is of no use in cases where the information is not held. We can get only the information held. Unless you can prove that the information denied is held bny the PIO or AA, I dont' think anything more can be done.
Please go through my thread " Ensure compliance of section 4 of RTI act2005" Actually the public authorities are acting without supporting the legal provisions. On introduction of RTI every one want to get information under RTI. I have read so many acts of Govt of India and legal provisions. As per my study so many rules already available to disclose the information and public authorities are bound to supply the same. Actually the performance of Judiciary in our country is very poor and public authorities are working on their own will. By giving the opportunity of inspection they just want to complete the formality. Actually they do not have such rules or orders. Noe I am making afforts for compliance of section 4 of RTI 2005.
I know that they do not have that document and without having any document they have done a wrong action. Now under section 4 of RTI 2005 there is necessity of supporting documents, policy, rules etc. and I have already submitted an application for display of information needed in section 4.