Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 9 to 16 of 18
  1. #9
    Posts
    43,876
    Name:
    C J Karira
    Blog Entries
    9
    Mentioned
    43 Post(s)
    Tagged
    14 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    168 Post(s)

    Re: 'substantially financed' while defining any organization to be Public Body.


    Another helpful decision of the APSIC about "Public Authority".

    Birla institute is a ‘public authority’

    Special Correspondent




    Hyderabad: State Information Commissioner Ambaty Subba Rao on Friday held that the Birla Archaeological and Cultural Research Institute in the city was a ‘Public Authority’ as per Section 2 (H) of the Right to Information Act (RTI), 2005.

    He expressed this view while disposing a petition by Y. Ravi Kiran, a resident of Hyderabad who had asked for information and documents under Section 6 (1) of the RTI Act, but was denied the same on the plea that the institute was neither under the control of the State nor the Central Government and did not fall within the meaning of the expression ‘Public Authority’ under the provision of the RTI Act.

    Mr. Rao contended that the institute was registered under Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Public Societies Registration Act, 1350 Fasli (Act 1 of 1350 F) and the State Government had made available vast extent of land.

    The Hindu : Andhra Pradesh / Hyderabad News : Birla institute is a ‘public authority’


    › Find content similar to: 'substantially financed' while defining any organization to be Public Body.



  2. #10
    Posts
    9
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    birla v/s RTI


    Dear Friends:
    When Birla's said that they do not come under RTI Act. I wrote to various sources(using RTI) from where the funds were given.
    The details of the society are as under:
    1. Birla Archeological and Cultural Research Institute, 2. The H. Qrts 1/12A & 80G/22/94-95 dt. 22-09-94 of the Commissioner of Income-Tax, A.P.-l,
    Hyderabad has given Income Tax Exemptions.
    3. The land is allotted to Birla Archeological and Cultural Research Institute, Hyderabad by Government of Andhra Pradesh vide G.O. (Ms) No.84 M.A. dated 14th February 1986.
    4. The Exhibitions were donated to Birla Archeological and Cultural Research Institute by Govt. of Andhra Pradesh G.O. Ms. No. 166 dated 30.06.1992.
    5. Funds were received (from 1989-1995) in the form of Grants in Aid from Department of Ocean Development (now the Ministry of Earth Sciences), Govt. of India
    6. Donations of Computer systems were given by ECIL for display/exhibition at the Centre. Annual payment towards projection of Corporate video (ECIL) is received by Birla Archeological and Cultural Research Institute.
    7. National Remote Sensing Agency (NRSA) has fixed a permanent exhibition in the museum depicting various developments in the Space and Remote Sensing Technology by providing all the exhibits and paying Rs 3,86,250/-
    8. Geological Survey of India has donated fossils of Dinosaurs dating back to 150 million years to display at Birla Archeological and Cultural Research Institute.
    9. Department of Space, Govt. of India has given grant in aid to Birla Archeological and Cultural Research Institute.
    10. As per Department of Science & Technology, Govt. of India, MoU on a Joint Laboratory for Applicable Mathematics and Information Sciences between the University of Udine and the B.M.Birla Science Centre (division of Birla Archeological and Cultural Research Institute) is signed.
    All the above facts state that Birla Archeological and Cultural Research Institute falls within the ambit of Section 2(h) of RTI Act-2005.

    However the problem comes where the funding are of state and central, whether we must write to SIC or CIC. But as it was registered under A.P. Societies act...I approached SIC.
    Since it is a big fish in the net, SIC first released it to press. I did not receive the copy.
    Thanks
    Ravi

  3. #11
    Posts
    43,876
    Name:
    C J Karira
    Blog Entries
    9
    Mentioned
    43 Post(s)
    Tagged
    14 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    168 Post(s)

    Re: 'substantially financed' while defining any organization to be Public Body.


    Ravi,

    From the information detailed in your above post, it can be very well argued that the Birla Arch. & Cultural institute is a PA.
    Since APSIC has already decided on that, if you feel that your purpose of applying under RTI Act will be well served by APSIC, you can stop at that.
    If you have any doubts and want to use a "pincer" attack, then approach the CIC also because several of the fund givers are under the central govt.

  4. #12
    Posts
    9
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: 'substantially financed' while defining any organization to be Public Body.



    Hi Karira:

    That is a good idea of attempting CIC but now the time between
    Appellate authority and CIC has crossed 8 months. Again I must start a fresh process. Let Birla's go to High Court. I got lot of information from Municipal Corporation saying that their activities are totally illegal. I filed one at Vigiance and other at MCH asking them why they are not taking action against Birla's etc.

    Let me see what happens.

    Regards.

    Ravi

  5. #13
    Posts
    7
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: How to check if it's a Public Authority for RTI Act


    Quote Originally Posted by karira View Post
    The CIC has given detailed arguments in determining if IFCI is a Public Authority (PA) or not, under the RTI Act.
    Although both IFCI and the Ministry Of Finance contended that IFCI is not a PA, CIC has finally ruled that it is indeed a PA under RTI.
    Some of the arguments given by CIC are worth noting for future interpretations of whether anyone is "PA" or not.
    Please see the full decision of CIC at:

    http://cic.gov.in/CIC-Orders/Decision_31052007_01.pdf
    Friends ,

    Recently I had occasion to approach IFCI for info under RTI. Informally , they seem to claim having obtained a stay from the Delhi High Court against the CIC ruling of May 2007. Am awaiting formal reply.

    Rajat Narain

  6. #14
    Posts
    28
    Name:
    mukesh agrawal
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    substantially financed,
    the madhya pradesh state government has issued amendments in the Right to Information(Fees and Appeal) rules, 2005: -which states
    "Substantially Financed" means where fifty percent of annual turn over or
    rupees fifty thousand, which ever is less, is financed by the Government or any of its institution.it can be used for the state of M.P. I have the pdf file of the same.

    virtualmukesh

    I do not know how to add a file to the message
    Last edited by ambrish.p; 07-03-10 at 11:51 AM.

  7. #15
    Posts
    16,658
    Name:
    ambrish
    Blog Entries
    3
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    5 Post(s)

    Re: 'substantially financed' while defining any organization to be Public Body.


    Quote Originally Posted by virtualmukesh View Post
    I do not know how to add a file to the message
    Dear Mukesh

    At the bottom of reply box you will find two buttons. Post Quick Reply & Go Advanced.

    1) Press on Go Advanced.
    2) That will take you to a new page which will provide you with more options for posting your reply.
    3) On this page you will find an option titled Attach Files with a button named Manage Attachments.
    4) Hope it helps

    Also see: http://www.rtiindia.org/forum/32307-...ntial-etc.html

    regards

  8. #16
    Posts
    2,671
    Name:
    Dinesh
    Blog Entries
    26
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: 'substantially financed' while defining any organization to be Public Body.


    I have a similar case pending for second appeal against a NGO which is financed by Govt. Delhi.

    The NGO has received funds of more then 20 lakhs in last three years (I have no records of funds provided before three years)

    A direct RTI application was address to NGO which is not replied. First appeal was filed before Registrar of Societies but he too has not replied. Now I have to file second appeal in this case.

    Can this NGO be termed as "Substantially financed" ?

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Tags for this Thread



About RTI INDIA

    RTI INDIA: Invoking Your Rights. We provide easy ways to request, analyze & share Government documents by use of Right to Information and by way of community support.

Follow us on

Twitter Facebook youtube Tumblr RTI Microblog RSS Feed Apple App Store Google Play for Android