In support of my above post, please see:
ii) The Chairman, Steel Authority of India Ltd. and the Secretary, Ministry of Steelthe Act are fulfilled. A compliance report should be furnished at the earliest.
are directed to ensure that the obligations of public authorities, as mandated u/s 4(1) of
However, having accepted the arguments of the public authority as above, we are constrained to observe that as point out by the complainant, the MoUD is not in full compliance with Section 4 (1) (d). She has, in Annexure-A to her rejoinder also pointed out the gaps in information u/s 4 (1) (b) on the MoUD’s website. A copy of this rejoinder is appended with this decision. The MoUD would be well-advised to examine the suggestions made and adopt them in a manner facilitating public access to information under the RTI Act as mandated by Section 4 of the Act".
In the case of DDA they arewithin one month of the date of issue of this order.
directed to comply with the provisions of sec. 4(1)(c) & (d) in matters concerning
them which affect the public in general. Even though they have maintained that
they have not received the orders of PIO, LG’s office and do not hold the
information sought in this case, compliance to this direction must be completed